Switching back to serious mode, the CDC criteria for Coronvirus testing is absolutely absurd:
>>>Already in deep distress, the patient was rushed last week to a hospital in Northern California, severely ill and unable to breathe on her own.
Doctors at the University of California, Davis Medical Center, near Sacramento, provided the woman with critical care but also considered an unlikely diagnosis: infection with the coronavirus.
Hospital administrators said they immediately requested diagnostic testing from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, but the procedure was not carried out because the case did not qualify under strict federal criteria: She had not traveled to China and had not been in contact with anyone known to be infected. . . .
“I think the diagnostic issue is the single most important thing that keeps me up at night right now,” said Lauren Sauer, director of operations at the Johns Hopkins Office of Critical Event Preparedness and Response. . . .
“The obvious observation is that many countries are capable of testing rather widely,” said Dr. William Schaffner, an infectious disease specialist at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. “Why can’t we?” . . .
The C.D.C. operates two laboratories that test for the coronavirus and can handle approximately 400 specimens per day. Agency officials say there is no testing backlog, but it is unclear whether the labs will be able to keep up with demand if the need — and eligibility — increases testing substantially. . . .
A criticism of the new criteria [instituted after the California case], however, is that doctors will have to wait until someone is extremely ill to test for the virus if that person did not travel to the affected regions or have contact with a known case. . . .
“If we could identify these people earlier who don’t specifically meet one of the two criteria, or some sort of broader travel criteria, we could get them tested,” Ms. Sauer said. “You have to wait until someone’s really sick to push that test now, even with this new criteria.<<<
Doctors suspected infection with the virus, but the patient did not fit the federal criteria and was not tested for days.
www.nytimes.com
Why in the world would the CDC set the testing criteria so high? Also, it's amazing to me that the CDC has not ramped up it's testing capabilities. 400 per day seems WAY too low.