I haven’t had hands-on with the T-S500, but I used to own a TX-950. I believe the 950 is a much better tuner.
First consider the comparative prices. The 500 lists for $300. The 950 listed for $400 for in the early 90s. If the 950 were made today, it would cost nearly $800. IIR, it was Yamaha’s last high-end tuner.
Specs – no contest:
Signal to noise ratio stereo
T-S500: 75dB / TX- 950: 90dB
Harmonic distortion stereo
T-S500: 0.5% / TX- 950: 0.03%
Frequency response 20Hz – 15 kHz
T-S500: -3dB / TX- 950: +/- 0.5dB
Stereo separation 1 kHz
T-S500: 43dB / TX- 950: 50dB
Image rejection ratio
T-S500: 80dB / TX- 950: 90dB
IF rejection ratio
T-S500: 70dB / TX- 950: 110dB
Selectivity 400 kHz
T-S500: 70dB / TX- 950: 85dB
The TX-950 spec sheet has lots of specs that the T-S500 doesn’t even publish.
In addition, the 950 was chock-full of nifty features, such as dual antenna inputs. This would allow you to say, use a “regular” antenna for local stations, along with a high-powered directional antenna to pull in stations from a distant city.
Digital fine tuning, to get the best signal from weak stations; two-position IF mode selector; an RF attenuator, to reduce the signal level if you happen to live close to the broadcast tower.
These features and others (along with the antenna input) could be dialed in (no pun intended) for any station, saved to memory, and recalled when you wanted to listen to that station.
Speaking of memory, the 950 probably has more programmable memory slots than you have local stations. No kidding.
In short, the TX-950 probably isn’t the best tuner ever made, but it certainly is a fine example. If you can find one on ebay for under $100, or even for the same price as the T-S500, it would be a bargain.
If you can’t find one with a dedicated remote, the remote from any receiver from the era should work.
Regards,
Wayne A. Pflughaupt