That's the prevailing view here... just as the prevailing view elsewhere is that you have to spend over $10k to get something that performs decently.
The specs on the Best Buy stuff are frequently selective or suggestive. The specs on the hyper expensive stuff are either superfluous or subjective.
I'm hoping to see something more nuanced than these two extremes on audio forums some day, because the doctrine that exists on either fringe of the audio movement bore me to death.
Now, it would be absurd to recommend a high mid-range amp to drive a pair of $500 stand mounted speakers. Just as it would be absurd to dispel the chance that these speakers will be exchanged for higher performing models at some point.
Amps, if chosen wisely, can provide long service. If chosen hastily, they become a part of a frustrating audio chain that gets replaced over and over again.
I understand the fickle nature of the audio visual end of the hobby that makes things tough, but it's not absurd to expect 5-7 entirely pleasurable years of use from a well chosen amp.