I don't know what you guys do for a living or what area your expertise is in, but what would you think if some bought-off talking head in some politically slanted venue started trashing your work, saying you are lying for political convenience in a subject you have dedicated your life to studying, or maybe invested tens of thousands of hours for a doctorate? And they can only produce a handful of fringe scientists to challenge your work, none of whose work they can even get legitimately peered.
I don't profess to understand much of the data of climatology, but many of the scientists I have known across several disciplines are all people I knew to have a great deal of integrity and would certainly have followed their own work where ever it lead, regardless of the political zeitgeist. I don't imagine climatology is very different. Therefore, the idea that an entire body of scientists on climatology, meteorology, and every other atmospheric science are involved in some kind of grand conspiracy is absurd to the same degree that lizard people illuminati control the world.
Instead of claiming these scientists are cooking the books, why don't you go talk to them in person- and then weigh their credibility against that of some crank at a right-wing rag.