P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
When it comes to built quality Marantz looks better then Denon except X4000 which looks great.

So to summarize, Marantz sound is warm and Denon is bright or not as warm or soft as Marantz. It all comes to taste.
As I said before when you compared built quality you needed to compare the SR7007/7008 with the Denon 4311 and 4520, not the X4000.

Regarding the warm and cold thing you should not generalize because you have not heard all of their other models. I can tell you again that my Marantz separates AV7005, AV8801 and SC7 plus external amps including two Marantz amps do not sound warm and my Denon 3805, 4308 and even the little 1912 do not sound any colder. They all sounded quite neutral to me and others who had listened to them. I cannot comment on the SR7007 and the X4000 because I have not listened to them. Again, my point is not to contradict yours at all, but that you cannot generalize that one brand is "warmer" than the other brand. Such generalizations perhaps may have been what's feeding the audio community with hearsay and reconception.
 
B

bwspot

Junior Audioholic
As I said before when you compared built quality you needed to compare the SR7007/7008 with the Denon 4311 and 4520, not the X4000.

Regarding the warm and cold thing you should not generalize because you have not heard all of their other models. I can tell you again that my Marantz separates AV7005, AV8801 and SC7 plus external amps including two Marantz amps do not sound warm and my Denon 3805, 4308 and even the little 1912 do not sound any colder. They all sounded quite neutral to me and others who had listened to them. I cannot comment on the SR7007 and the X4000 because I have not listened to them. Again, my point is not to contradict yours at all, but that you cannot generalize that one brand is "warmer" than the other brand. Such generalizations perhaps may have been what's feeding the audio community with hearsay and reconception.
I did not listen to the models you mentioned but only X1000, X2000, X3000, X4000 and Sr5008, Sr6008 and Sr7007.
With above models I do hear Marantz generating sound that is softer and warmer compared to Denon that sounds brighter.
I have read lots of comments over the internet about it and I myself did not want to believe it until now.
I have heard it myself. I just cannot say they sound all neutral as they don't.
I guess the best recommendation for everyone is to go and listen and judge yourself.

On the side note (no offense here) is it possible that many listeners just don't hear the differences due to their limited hearing abilities?
I tested myself against few colleges and we measured that most of them can here up to 15000hz when I could hear up to 18400hz.
(we did blind testing with the headsets on without knowing how high the frequency was)
However the low tones differences should be noticeable much easier.
 
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
On the side note (no offense here) is it possible that many listeners just don't hear the differences due to their limited hearing abilities?
I tested myself against few colleges and we measured that most of them can here up to 15000hz when I could hear up to 18400hz.
(we did blind testing with the headsets on without knowing how high the frequency was)
However the low tones differences should be noticeable much easier.
That is a fair point and it is of course possible. In my case, I did not do my comparison listening by myself either and I was sure others with me have excellent hearings. Also, I could pick out the difference in sound between speakers and minute distortions in certain recordings that others claim could not detect. I suspect you walked into this from the beginning already influenced by those internet and dealers hearsay. Yes on the internet you can find similar claims but you could also find similar counter claims or counter both claims (as I do) so what does that really tell you? That's why I believe in facts and figures first, however incomplete, they are more objective, from there I then go and find out for myself as base my final decsion on my own subjective perception. My subjective perception is literally subjective, totally not to be confused with facts.

Think about if it make any logical and/or scientific sense to you, that manufacturers would some how do that sort of thing with their gear. If they did it purposely then I have nothing good to say about them. If they did it accidentally then it would not have been so consistent for such long time. And it this is all true, then we are in deep trouble trying to categorize not only which brands are warmer than others, but also grade them, or I guess we have to do comparison listening to at least a few models of many brands, to find out what we really like, that would be ridiculous considering today's technological advance.

One not so easy way you can do to resolve this issue without basing on something naturally subjective, is to do some real and reasonably well conducted blind tests with some friends together. Or just don't bother asking or telling, just believe what you belive and go with what you like. No one can't dispute what you claimed as long as you don't pass it around as facts, but rather just your own perception.
 
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
I tested myself against few colleges and we measured that most of them can here up to 15000hz when I could hear up to 18400hz.
(we did blind testing with the headsets on without knowing how high the frequency was)
However the low tones differences should be noticeable much easier.
Just one more quick point on this. If you are only talking about warm sound, or not, it would have little to do with anything above 10 KHz or even lower. It probably has more to do with the range below 8KHz.
 
B

bwspot

Junior Audioholic
That is a fair point and it is of course possible. In my case, I did not do my comparison listening by myself either and I was sure others with me have excellent hearings. Also, I could pick out the difference in sound between speakers and minute distortions in certain recordings that others claim could not detect. I suspect you walked into this from the beginning already influenced by those internet and dealers hearsay. Yes on the internet you can find similar claims but you could also find similar counter claims or counter both claims (as I do) so what does that really tell you? That's why I believe in facts and figures first, however incomplete, they are more objective, from there I then go and find out for myself as base my final decsion on my own subjective perception. My subjective perception is literally subjective, totally not to be confused with facts.

Think about if it make any logical and/or scientific sense to you, that manufacturers would some how do that sort of thing with their gear. If they did it purposely then I have nothing good to say about them. If they did it accidentally then it would not have been so consistent for such long time. And it this is all true, then we are in deep trouble trying to categorize not only which brands are warmer than others, but also grade them, or I guess we have to do comparison listening to at least a few models of many brands, to find out what we really like, that would be ridiculous considering today's technological advance.

One not so easy way you can do to resolve this issue without basing on something naturally subjective, is to do some real and reasonably well conducted blind tests with some friends together. Or just don't bother asking or telling, just believe what you belive and go with what you like. No one can't dispute what you claimed as long as you don't pass it around as facts, but rather just your own perception.
I stumbled upon bright and warm opinions during my search for the new AV. I did not know anything about warm and bright differences. It just got me very curious and I wanted to learn and see if those claims are valid or just BS opinions. Yes, I agree, we might say every claim is subjective and only measurements are true facts.

The manufacturers not necessary plan for the sound to be bright or warm. It might just be an outcome of their manufacturing process? (parts, components, design, etc.)
Yes, the specifications should tell us everything, but many times we see very similar specifications but different results.
Speakers probably would be a good example. Why not compare the AV receivers to speakers? They all different, but specification wise not that far away.
Same with tvs. They all are pre-programmed to display specific colors to attract the buyer and none of them are calibrated to ISO standards and even if they were the picture would look different as the equipment would not necessary be able to produce perfect calibrated signal.
Why? Because every brand uses different components and designs their equipment in different way. Why don't we just have one brand for everything?
Equipment differs and that is just the way it is. Why do we have so many DACs? Many use same chips and still sound better according to so many people? (do they?)
But according many others they just the same as specifications are the same. It all might be subjective, but there has to be some truth to those little tiny differences.
Of course, we should be comparing apples to apples.

I am not trying to spread the news that Marantz is warm and Denon is bright. This is just my opinion based on my own subjective tests, but because it was very easy for me to distinguish those differences I made few statements about it. If i could tell so easily together with few people that joined me during the testing, would not this prove that there is some truth to it?
What happens to dozen of subjective opinions that are similar? Are those still subjective?

Sure, I will choose what I like the most myself as even if something has perfect specifications but my ear prefers something that looks worse on the paper I will go with what feels better to me.
Its my investment.

I find this forum very interesting as I can learn a lot, so why not ask and share my findings.
 
B

bwspot

Junior Audioholic
Just one more quick point on this. If you are only talking about warm sound, or not, it would have little to do with anything above 10 KHz or even lower. It probably has more to do with the range below 8KHz.
This is why I said that it would be easier to distinguish the low tones. Example, my dead can hear only up to 11000hz as he is an older person. I took him to the store with me and even he was able to notice the difference. I did not tell him what to look for. I just ask, can you hear any difference?
 
rojo

rojo

Audioholic Samurai
See this page for a look at the differences in components between Marantz and Denon. I believe bw probably did hear a difference, although what he's interpreting as warmth may not be as simple as a different frequency response. Maybe it's a higher slew rate on the Marantz receivers.

bw, sorry if you already said and I missed it, but what were you using as a source? Do you have any way of knowing whether that source was connected to the receivers via analog or digital? I'm guessing Best Buy's receiver and source selectors are probably analog, but I have no actual evidence to support that assumption. But if it was digital, that might further explain the difference. The d/a converter in Marantz receivers is better than in Denon X#000 if the pictures on the page I linked are to be trusted.

Sent from my LG-VS980 using Tapatalk
 
H

herbu

Audioholic Samurai
Example, my dead can hear only up to 11000hz as he is an older person.
I also cannot hear above 11KHz, and I am also and older person. However, I can assure you with relative certainty that I am not dead.
 
rojo

rojo

Audioholic Samurai
He says he's not dead!

Sent from my LG-VS980 using Tapatalk
 
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
See this page for a look at the differences in components between Marantz and Denon. I believe bw probably did hear a difference, although what he's interpreting as warmth may not be as simple as a different frequency response. Maybe it's a higher slew rate on the Marantz receivers.
The problem now is that you cannot do a fair comparison between D&M models easily as they sort of fit between each other. It seems to be in this order from high to low in terms of built quality:

Denon 4520
Marantz 7008
Denon X4000
Marantz 6008
Marantz 5008
Denon X3000


bw, sorry if you already said and I missed it, but what were you using as a source? Do you have any way of knowing whether that source was connected to the receivers via analog or digital? I'm guessing Best Buy's receiver and source selectors are probably analog, but I have no actual evidence to support that assumption. But if it was digital, that might further explain the difference. The d/a converter in Marantz receivers is better than in Denon X#000 if the pictures on the page I linked are to be trusted.

Sent from my LG-VS980 using Tapatalk
IIRC he used his iphone and the analog input of the BB AVRs. I said multiple times I believed he heard what he heard but I also believe there were other factors that influenced what he thought he heard. There is an interested thread about reliability of human senses. Link: http://forums.audioholics.com/forums/general-av-discussions/90640-reliability-human-senses.html
 
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
I find this forum very interesting as I can learn a lot, so why not ask and share my findings.
That's great, and I agree with most everything you said in this post. My whole point is about opinion vs statement of facts and even on facts, there is the issue of generalization, and I do realize the lines are often blurred. IMO, communication is the source of problems most of the time. So it seems that in the end you concluded you like both kinds of sonic signatures, what are you going to do now, buy one of each? You can use one on the odd days and the other on the even days.:D
 
B

bwspot

Junior Audioholic
See this page for a look at the differences in components between Marantz and Denon. I believe bw probably did hear a difference, although what he's interpreting as warmth may not be as simple as a different frequency response. Maybe it's a higher slew rate on the Marantz receivers.

bw, sorry if you already said and I missed it, but what were you using as a source? Do you have any way of knowing whether that source was connected to the receivers via analog or digital? I'm guessing Best Buy's receiver and source selectors are probably analog, but I have no actual evidence to support that assumption. But if it was digital, that might further explain the difference. The d/a converter in Marantz receivers is better than in Denon X#000 if the pictures on the page I linked are to be trusted.

Sent from my LG-VS980 using Tapatalk
Thx i looked at the page before and I noticed that components used in Marantz are supposed to be better?
I was never leaning toward any of the brand. I am just curious about existence of differences in sound.
I understand that warm or whatever I hear is not because of the frequencies but rather how sound is created in these frequencies ranges.
Simple example would be to take audacity software and play with the sound. Same frequency range but different sound if you start applying different filters.
But when it comes to comparing difference between somebody who can hear up to 11000kz and somebody who can hear up to 18000 it is huge.
Try to downsample 44khz sound to 22khz and compare both.

I used both the iphone audio out to eliminate Dacs differences and the USB flash drive. In both cases I was able to hear same differences i mentioned.
How do you know that Dac in Marantz is better then one in Denon?
Dacs differences is probably another topic that was discussed all over the internet billions of times.
 
B

bwspot

Junior Audioholic
That's great, and I agree with most everything you said in this post. My whole point is about opinion vs statement of facts and even on facts, there is the issue of generalization, and I do realize the lines are often blurred. IMO, communication is the source of problems most of the time. So it seems that in the end you concluded you like both kinds of sonic signatures, what are you going to do now, buy one of each? You can use one on the odd days and the other on the even days.:D
To tell you the truth I still don't know. I would probably be better off if I would not listen to any of them and just go with the flow and get something. My hearing is telling me that X4000 sounds the best. When I was in the store, every time I would listen to X4000 there was something appealing how I was perceiving the sound. The Sr7007 did not have that impact on me, although it felt like sound had more power. It was not about the price at all, just the gut feel and my own subjective perception. At the same time I am not sure if it is worth the investment as I wont use any of the advanced features as I only listen to stereo and reason for the AV is the ARC HDMI switching. So, i am left to choose between x2000 and sr5008 and here it all comes to features and decision which sound I would prefer. Thx to my curiosity I learned a lot from all of you, so no matter what I choose I am winner. Probably, when I start listening to it without having another piece I will be happy and wont compare anymore. I like to learn before I buy. It is just the way I am.
 
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
I only listen to stereo and reason for the AV is the ARC HDMI switching.
What exactly do you mean by that? If you can be more specific and clear about your exact needs others may suggest alternatives to a multichannel AVR so you don't end up with tons of features you won't be using.
 
B

bwspot

Junior Audioholic
What exactly do you mean by that? If you can be more specific and clear about your exact needs others may suggest alternatives to a multichannel AVR so you don't end up with tons of features you won't be using.
I do have satellite, bluray and tv and network audio source. With Arc i can just run one wire to tv from the av and if I understand correctly when I switch the tv for blurray the AV will automatically play the blurray sound. If I switch for satellite the AV will play satellite. This makes wife happy as there is no need to press the source input on the receiver remote again. In addition the receiver would play the network source while the tv is off. So my ideal system would have arc hdmi inputs only, few digital optical inputs, 1 or 2 analog ins, 2.1 outs, usb in and thats all, no extra unneeded connections. I still don't understand why all those av receivers have so many unnecessary inputs and outputs.
 
B

bwspot

Junior Audioholic
Seems like new receivers are coming soon from Marantz and Denon already announced it.
I spoke with Marantz and they told me that the announcements will come soon.
I pulled the trigger on X2000.
I want to see how it sounds with my speakers.
If i don't like the Denon sound I will try Marantz.
X2000 seems to be really a good deal for now.
 
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
Seems like new receivers are coming soon from Marantz and Denon already announced it.
I spoke with Marantz and they told me that the announcements will come soon.
I pulled the trigger on X2000.
I want to see how it sounds with my speakers.
If i don't like the Denon sound I will try Marantz.
X2000 seems to be really a good deal for now.
I guessed wrong, I really thought it would be the SR5008.
 
B

bwspot

Junior Audioholic
As I said before I am not bias towards any brand. I want to hear Denon with my speakers to see what is at stake.
No big deal as I can return it anytime. The only part that bugs me the most is the shiny design at front.
 
Last edited:
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
As I said before I am not bias towards any brand. I want to hear Denon with my speakers to see what is at stake.
No big deal as I can return it anytime. The only part that bugs me the most is the shiny design at front.
To me the lack of preouts is the show stopper.
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top