Speakers; When is good enough, enough

Discussion in 'GENERAL AV Discussions' started by jeffsg4mac, May 27, 2004.

  1. ltucker305 Audiophyte

    ltucker305
    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Vandersteen All The Way

    Speaker listening is a matter of preference. I am new to high-end audio but I have listened to a number of speakers. In my opinion nothing compares to box-less setup as in vandersteen and b&w. Vandersteens are so open, airy and true. Take a listen to them. You will see what I mean. 3a signature with 2 2wq subs is phenomonal. Retail it would cost about $6000. $3500 for 3a and $2500 for the subs. After hearing this setup you will want to trade in.

    So I do not sound crazy here is a list of what I have heard in demo rooms.

    sonus faber amati, stradavari
    harbeth - all models
    spendor - all models
    b&w - all models
    paradigm - all models
    jm lab - grand utopia signature, nova utopia be
    epos - all models
    axiom - all models

    Sincerely,
    Larry
  2. zumbo Audioholic Spartan

    zumbo
    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2004
    Messages:
    6,469
    Likes Received:
    639
    I have something I wish everyone here could hear. :D
  3. calgarianperson Junior Audioholic

    calgarianperson
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2005
    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    0
    going through this thread i found some setups that i liked and im currently looking at upgrading (i need 2 fronts, 2 surrounds, 2 rear, 1 center, and 1 or 2 subs)

    • a good front set (the moniter 7, 9, 11 or 90P)
    • good surrounds (ADP 370)
    • good rears (monitor mini, 3 or 5)
    • a center channel (CC 370)
    • and decent sub/subs (appears to be no monitor sub so if you can reccomend one that would be great)

    These might be out of my price range but im not sure so if anybody has a list of the MSRPs or knows about how much i can get them for new i would appreciate it. I noticed that alot of people like these but if anyone reccomends something else let me know.

    Thanks.
  4. zumbo Audioholic Spartan

    zumbo
    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2004
    Messages:
    6,469
    Likes Received:
    639
  5. calgarianperson Junior Audioholic

    calgarianperson
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2005
    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    0
    thanks... i figured out why i couldnt find them... im in canada and the canadian site doesnt list them... funny though since they are manufactured here.
  6. Frick & Frack Audiophyte

    Frick & Frack
    Joined:
    May 24, 2005
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    I've upgraded over the years and just bought a Paradigm Monitor 9 system from a defunct dealer. One thing I will say is that while the cost vs. performance (benefit) threshold may not have yet been reached by many of you, I am finding that that at my age (approaching 50) the equation looks like this.....

    Cost ...............x........age =........what speakers you need
    Performance...............hearing loss


    But then again, I could be wrong... ;)
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 19, 2014
  7. JoeE SP9 Senior Audioholic

    JoeE SP9
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    721
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Phila. PA
    Speakers are good enough when you have no urge to upgrade. I have owned my Acoustats for more than ten years and still have no urge to upgrade or change them. :cool:
  8. hyghwayman Audioholic

    hyghwayman
    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2006
    Messages:
    181
    Likes Received:
    28
    Location:
    Earth for now
    upgrading

    So do you all think upgrading from my $65 HTiB 5.1 40w speakers [(DVD player and speakers)speakers are hooked up to a Pioneer VSX-816 receiver] to a $999 5.1 system from SVSound (SBS-01) will be worth the $$$ for improvement in the noise I hear?
    From this:
    [​IMG]see that whimpy speaker under the TV.
    Here is the sub[​IMG] it's also a 40w powered type:p[​IMG]

    To this:
    [​IMG]:D

    Just wondering out loud,
    hyghwayman
  9. Tomorrow Audioholic Ninja

    Tomorrow
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    4,281
    Likes Received:
    1,206

    Well, it depends on what you like. You're the one that has to listen to it and pay for it. :)
  10. TLS Guy Audioholic Overlord

    TLS Guy
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    13,889
    Likes Received:
    5,285
    Location:
    Benedict MN
    Actually those so called custom drivers have largely cosmetic changes only. There are lots of good drivers available to the amateur builder from the companies you mention. There is one highly touted speaker manufacturer on these forums who sources some drivers from a pretty low end Chinese company called Tangband.

    I think there are huge advantages to designing your own speakers. In fact I think all serious audiophiles should try and learn the art. You like me are a physician, so have the ideal skill sets, especially to balance the sum of compromises.

    My current speakers. I have a close colleague who has a 20K pair of B & Ws and he prefers these. He chose them because they sounded closest to these.

    http://mdcarter.smugmug.com/Walberswick Studios
  11. Exit Audioholic Chief

    Exit
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    991
    Likes Received:
    165
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    I think you can gauge the sound of your system and room acoustics by listening to a very good set of headphones. That takes room acoustics and speakers out of the listening equation. If you can get your system and room to sound better than very good headphones, then I think you should be satisfied and not seek more expensive equipment. You should be able to beat the sound of headphones in very low bass and surround sound, but the real challange is stereo music where direct comparisons can be made. Just my $.02 worth. Very good headphones can be found at:

    http://www.headphone.com/
    Exit,
  12. TLS Guy Audioholic Overlord

    TLS Guy
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    13,889
    Likes Received:
    5,285
    Location:
    Benedict MN
    You have a good point. Good headphones are a very good check on the smooth mid and HF response of speakers. I use high end Sennheisers. I use them mainly in editing work. I don't do much continued listening with phones, as I don't particularly enjoy the perspective they give.

    The ultimate head phones are the Stax electrostatics. They sound a LOT better than anything else. I have just felt I would not use them enough to justify the investment.

    http://www.needledoctor.com/Online-Store/Stax-Headphones
  13. Joe Schmoe Audioholic Ninja

    Joe Schmoe
    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    Messages:
    3,051
    Likes Received:
    252
    There is a slight possibility that I could be permanently satisfied with a pair of Magico Minis.:D (Of course, they cost more than a full year's salary, gross not net.)
  14. TLS Guy Audioholic Overlord

    TLS Guy
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    13,889
    Likes Received:
    5,285
    Location:
    Benedict MN
    I have not seen those speakers before. The cabinets look beautifully made. I think the woofers are by Accuton, the tweeters are definitely from Scanspeak.

    So they have about $1200 in drivers before building the cabinets, and crossovers. The caps are high priced German Mundorfs.

    The frequency response is stated 40 Hz "in room". Translation, no diffraction compensation. If you like the human voice, and I think you do, these are probably not for you.
  15. Joe Schmoe Audioholic Ninja

    Joe Schmoe
    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    Messages:
    3,051
    Likes Received:
    252
    Thanks. I guess I will have to save that spare $29,000 I had set aside for something else.:rolleyes:
  16. Exit Audioholic Chief

    Exit
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    991
    Likes Received:
    165
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    I should modify my headphone standard to beating headphones in your economic class. (Sound for the masses) I will be happy beating $90 Senheiser headphones while others may target a much more expensive set of headphones. It just gives you a readily available means of music playback free of speaker coloration and room acoustics that you can compare to the same music played on your system. You don't have to remember what a potential upgrade set of speakers at an audio dealers sounded like.
    Exit,
  17. Joe Schmoe Audioholic Ninja

    Joe Schmoe
    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    Messages:
    3,051
    Likes Received:
    252
    Headphones are great for analysis, but I never enjoy listening to them. By contrast, I always enjoy listening to decent speakers.
  18. AcuDefTechGuy Seriously, I have no life.

    AcuDefTechGuy
    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2007
    Messages:
    20,289
    Likes Received:
    4,402
    Location:
    Oklahoma City
    I believe at least one person has already said this, but your speakers are good enough when you can't spend anymore.:D

    But it seems quite a few people believe that your speakers are good enough when you have the B&W 800D or 802Ds.:D
  19. markw Audioholic Overlord

    markw
    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2003
    Messages:
    11,235
    Likes Received:
    3,051
    Location:
    Joisey and Texas
    Your speakers (and system) are good enough when you can concentrate on simply enjoying the music and not spend every minute agonizing about what you might imagine is wrong with them.
  20. highfigh Audioholic Warlord

    highfigh
    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Messages:
    8,305
    Likes Received:
    1,909
    Location:
    Milwaukee area
    A live gig should never be compared to a studio recording although I have heard some really well recorded/mixed live recordings and gigs. That's a classic case of apples and oranges. Live can sound good or even great but it's far from being similar to a good studio and that brings me to another point- there's no reference for recording studios. A lot of them tend to use specific speakers pretty often but the rest of the equipment, the room size/treatments and effects/electronics tend to vary greatly.

    Someone who has rarely if ever heard live music, never played an instrument and was never close to an instrument being played- they will never know how it really sounds. If they like the way their system sounds, great. If not, they have no real basis for knowing if it sounds "correct".

    You bring up a great point about room treatments. Too many people are willing to spend tens of thousands of dollars on equipment but completely neglect the room's acoustics. This is so far from being the right way to go about setting up a system, it's ridiculous. Only after the room is relatively neutral, can speakers be auditioned and selected. Any other sequence is backward. Good results have been gotten by doing it the standard way and then tweaking the room but it's a lot more efficient and logical if the room is correct in the first place.

    You also mentioned diminishing returns- some people don't know what really sounds accurate or even good. Many who either have never heard a really great system or are new to trying to improve a system think loud=good, throbbing gristle bass=good, screaming treble=good or something equally absurd. I know someone who referred to my car stereo as sounding really "clean". It wasn't that clean at that point and it needed to be EQ'd better but it did sound good for some things, especially drums and guitar- bass was decent but it did image well. Nothing really special, though. For the ones who have no idea of what really sounds good, it ends up being a frustrating, expensive journey.

Share This Page

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
  • CEDIA