M

merlin1952

Audioholic Intern
I’ve been reading the board for a little while now and was looking for some information and advice. Some background first. I had a Pioneer amp that I bought back in the mid 70’s and had a pair of Pioneer CS-99 speakers. About 5 years ago I decided to get some new equipment. A friend I work with talked me into a Yamaha RX-V750 receiver. He had an older pair of Bose 901s and I ended up getting a pair of Bose 301 speakers. I would still have the Yamaha except for two things. One was that the Yamaha didn’t have HDMI connections and also the tuner stopped working. Anyway, I decided to try another Pioneer so I now have a Pioneer VSX-1020K. I really haven’t been all that excited about the way my music sounds for years now. I can’t necessarily say that it started with the Yamaha and the Bose but still the music just doesn’t sound like I remember it from years ago. All the music nowadays is digital and I have heard and read many times that the new digital music just doesn’t sound the same, “not as warm” as the old vinyl records of long ago. Since I’ve been reading different threads here I’m beginning to wonder if part of my problem might be my equipment. I do have a small Sony surround sound system but I prefer to listen to music in stereo 2 channels and the Sony sub. I know I’ve seen numerous posts here that are very negative towards Bose but I really haven’t understood exactly what everyone’s problem is with them. I’m not looking to start an argument I’m just truly looking for some answers and advice. If the Bose are my problem then please recommend a good set of front speakers in the same price range. If it’s something else then let me know where the problem is. Thanks in advance for any and all sincere advice.
 
I

InTheIndustry

Senior Audioholic
I’ve been reading the board for a little while now and was looking for some information and advice. Some background first. I had a Pioneer amp that I bought back in the mid 70’s and had a pair of Pioneer CS-99 speakers. About 5 years ago I decided to get some new equipment. A friend I work with talked me into a Yamaha RX-V750 receiver. He had an older pair of Bose 901s and I ended up getting a pair of Bose 301 speakers. I would still have the Yamaha except for two things. One was that the Yamaha didn’t have HDMI connections and also the tuner stopped working. Anyway, I decided to try another Pioneer so I now have a Pioneer VSX-1020K. I really haven’t been all that excited about the way my music sounds for years now. I can’t necessarily say that it started with the Yamaha and the Bose but still the music just doesn’t sound like I remember it from years ago. All the music nowadays is digital and I have heard and read many times that the new digital music just doesn’t sound the same, “not as warm” as the old vinyl records of long ago. Since I’ve been reading different threads here I’m beginning to wonder if part of my problem might be my equipment. I do have a small Sony surround sound system but I prefer to listen to music in stereo 2 channels and the Sony sub. I know I’ve seen numerous posts here that are very negative towards Bose but I really haven’t understood exactly what everyone’s problem is with them. I’m not looking to start an argument I’m just truly looking for some answers and advice. If the Bose are my problem then please recommend a good set of front speakers in the same price range. If it’s something else then let me know where the problem is. Thanks in advance for any and all sincere advice.
I believe your problem is most likely speakers mixed with a few other things. It's certainly not your receiver. I (& others) will be happy to help you, but some simple questions 1st to better understand....

- Dimensions of your room? W x D x H
- What are your listening habits? Volume level, types of music, sources (turntable you said, anything else?)
- Are you wanting 2 speakers AND a sub? Or, if you could get by with just 2 speakers would that be acceptable?
- Position of these speakers in your room? Meaning: Can they be brought out into the room a little bit, or are you going to need then as close to the back wall or in a corner as possible?
- How far away are you sitting when listening to music? Or, are you up walking around doing things and this is for general purpose back ground music?
- Aesthetic concerns? Just want something in black of would different finish options be attractive to you?
- Your absolute ceiling on what you'd feel comfortable spending as long as you got exactly what you wanted.

That should do it for now. Answer these questions the absolute best you can and with as much detail as you'd like and we can get started. Also, try to seperate it out so it's not a big wall of text.

Thanks!
 
sholling

sholling

Audioholic Ninja
While I'm not a huge fan of non-Elite Pioneers I don't believe that the receiver is your problem. The 1020 should be perfectly adequate for reasonably sensitive 6-8ohm speakers. Did you run the automatic setup routine? Perhaps your ready for new speakers? I had a roommate back in the 80s that had 901s and I remember thinking that they sounded to me like they had a blanket thrown over them. They were better than the newer mini-cubes that we all hate but what you are probably noticing is a lack of crisp highs and solid lows. That's because they lack specialized tweeters and woofers and just have a bunch of small "full range" drivers. Getting some tight speakers and a good solid sub and you'll hear and feel the music the way it is supposed to sound.

Get out and listen to newer speakers (not sony) and if you decide it's the speakers then I would build the best 2.1 or 3.1 system I could afford to start and then add surrounds later. Depending on the size of the room I'd plan on spending as much or more on the subwoofer as the left and right fronts. Anyway without more information (room size and musical taste) all I can do is toss out general ideas. Also keep in mind that speakers are subjective and what I like you may hate. Okay here are some general ideas:

Small to medium rooms:
  • I run 3 Usher S-520 (sold in pairs $400/pr, review) bookshelves in my 3000cuft master bedroom system. These are some of the best small bookshelves that I've heard. But they are not made for big rooms and they need a subwoofer to handle everything below 80hz.
Medium to large rooms:
  • Boston VR3 floor standing towers. I owned a set of these for years and loved them. They are long discontinued now but OneCall.com has the bundled with the timbre matched VRC center for $810 delivered. That's about half the original price.
  • It's been a long time since I heard Infinity's Classica C336 (review). At $1800/pr they got crappy reviews and frankly I wasn't impressed for for the price. But now that Amazon has them for $299ea shipped they might be worth a listen. I liked the Bostons better but that's my taste. The $230 CC225 is the matched center.
  • Infinity's entry priced Primus P362 is really popular here. I've heard them and they are good for the money. Unfortunately they are discontinued, but if you can find some they sell for $200-230ea. The matched center is a PC350 (~$250).

    These I have not heard but will toss them out as ideas based on reviews:
  • EMP Teks's Impression E5Ti ($500/pr, review) or E55Ti ($800/pr) and their matching E5Ci center ($220) are getting rave reviews. I own one of their other products and I'm very happy.
For subwoofers I recommend measuring the room including any attached spaces that are open to the room and contacting the major internet direct subwoofer specialists for a recommendation. The ones that I would contact are in alphabetical order: Epik, Elemental Designs, Hsu Research, and SVSounds. All are honest and none will try to oversell you. I own two SVS subs and a Hsu. Just bare in mind that some have longer delivery windows than others.
 
Last edited:
Pyrrho

Pyrrho

Audioholic Ninja
If you are wanting to recreate the sound of your old gear, nothing will sound more like it than your old gear sounded. Do you want to create the sound of your old gear, or do you want to create the sound of a live piano and other such sounds? If you want the former, I suggest you hook up your old gear and enjoy it, and if you want the latter, then you should spend some time listening to unamplified live music to know what it sounds like. Your old gear, though, was better in some ways than your newer gear (I would rather own Pioneer CS-99 speakers than Bose 301 speakers, but those are not the Bose speakers that are ones that get the most sorts of complaints, as, for example, these, though you will need to read past the verbal venom and look at the cold hard facts that are presented there).


As for analog versus digital, you might want to read these links:

http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/component/content/article/426.html
(Parts 1-5)

http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/technical-articles/427-a-secrets-technical-article.html
(Parts 6-9)


http://www.bostonaudiosociety.org/explanation.htm

http://www.bostonaudiosociety.org/bas_speaker/abx_testing2.htm


If you are thinking that you don't want to read so much and are skipping the links, think again, if you really want your questions answered.


With speakers, the best advice is to go out and listen to as many different speakers as you can stand, of different brands, and of different types (e.g., dome, horn, ribbon, whatever) that are in your price range. And listen with all of the types of music that you listen to at home. Some people, like me, love ribbons, and others do not (however, I would rather have a good dome or horn than a poorly implemented ribbon, so don't get wedded to a type and lose sight of the sound, if you will pardon the mixed imagery). The plain truth is, there is no such thing as a perfect speaker, so it is all a question of what vices one can live with, and what virtues one requires.
 
Last edited:
zieglj01

zieglj01

Audioholic Spartan
The Pioneer receiver is not the problem. You can do better than Bose.
It is hard to replace the sound of good vinyl records. However, you can
get good sounding music today. Also, at onecall.com look at the NHT
Classic Two speakers. They are good with music and do really sound
different and better than Bose. Also, go to musicdirect.com and look at
the Focal Chorus 705 bookshelf speakers. I can not speak for the Ushers -
however, they are worth looking in to. I do not want to bash Sony or
Bose - However, if you upgrade your speaker - I think you will find that
the Sony sub will not be able to keep up. I am a critical music listener
and being able to listen to good music is important to me.
 
sholling

sholling

Audioholic Ninja
While I'm not a huge fan of non-Elite Pioneers I don't believe that the receiver is your problem. The 1020 should be perfectly adequate for reasonably sensitive 6-8ohm speakers.
I should clarify. The 1020 isn't a bad budget receiver at all. I just didn't care for earlier versions. This year they fixed what I didn't like in the previous models.

I think you're in for an eye opening experience. :D
 
M

merlin1952

Audioholic Intern
Thanks for all the responses. To answer some of the questions;
Room = 14 x 24x 8
I listen to a lot of 60s and 70s top 40 (rock) music and some classical type music (I love the sound track for Master and Commander) and some stuff form the “Big Band Era”.
If I get the right sound I really don’t care if I have a sub or not when listening to music (movies are a different matter).
The speakers are on one end wall, in the corners, with curtains behind them and that’s pretty much where they will have to stay.
I sit at the opposite end of the room approximately 21 feet from the speakers.
Aesthetic = Some of the medium or darker wood grain (like the old CS-99s) would be nice but the Bose are flat black and they work ok so either will be acceptable.
I suppose if I get caught up in the whole idea of upgrading my sound system I would be willing to spend more but realistically I hope to stay around $400.00 for the two main speakers.
I don’t listen to any LPs and haven’t for years. I do still have a turntable but it’s in the attic and I don’t even know for sure if it still works. Everything I listen to now is either store bought CDs a few CDs that friends have copied and given to me and a few 100 songs from iTunes. As a matter of fact most of the music I’ve listened to in the past few months is stuff I loaded on to a thumb drive and play through my Blu-ray player. It consists of the 60s and 70s music I bought from iTunes and my CDs I had loaded in to my iTunes account. As I listened to these songs, some I hadn’t heard in years, it slowly occurred to me that I just really wasn’t really happy with the way it sounded. The songs just didn’t seem the same as I remembered them. Now, the more I listen to any music through my system the more I get convinced that I’m not happy with the sound. It really doesn’t matter if I’m listening to the thumb drive, a CD, classical stuff on the net radio, or some rock music over the traditional (air) FM radio. I hope this helps.
 
zieglj01

zieglj01

Audioholic Spartan
Thanks for all the responses. To answer some of the questions;
Room = 14 x 24x 8
I listen to a lot of 60s and 70s top 40 (rock) music and some classical type music (I love the sound track for Master and Commander) and some stuff form the “Big Band Era”.
If I get the right sound I really don’t care if I have a sub or not when listening to music (movies are a different matter).
The speakers are on one end wall, in the corners, with curtains behind them and that’s pretty much where they will have to stay.
I sit at the opposite end of the room approximately 21 feet from the speakers.
Aesthetic = Some of the medium or darker wood grain (like the old CS-99s) would be nice but the Bose are flat black and they work ok so either will be acceptable.
I suppose if I get caught up in the whole idea of upgrading my sound system I would be willing to spend more but realistically I hope to stay around $400.00 for the two main speakers.
I don’t listen to any LPs and haven’t for years. I do still have a turntable but it’s in the attic and I don’t even know for sure if it still works. Everything I listen to now is either store bought CDs a few CDs that friends have copied and given to me and a few 100 songs from iTunes. As a matter of fact most of the music I’ve listened to in the past few months is stuff I loaded on to a thumb drive and play through my Blu-ray player. It consists of the 60s and 70s music I bought from iTunes and my CDs I had loaded in to my iTunes account. As I listened to these songs, some I hadn’t heard in years, it slowly occurred to me that I just really wasn’t really happy with the way it sounded. The songs just didn’t seem the same as I remembered them. Now, the more I listen to any music through my system the more I get convinced that I’m not happy with the sound. It really doesn’t matter if I’m listening to the thumb drive, a CD, classical stuff on the net radio, or some rock music over the traditional (air) FM radio. I hope this helps.
Maybe you are looking for something more in life. Any way at the
end wall - how far apart are the two front channel speakers. You
can get by with out a sub for music. The Bose speakers will not
give you life like sound. They were not made with the process of
audiophile developement in mind. The budget of $400 - $500 will
get you something better.
 
Pyrrho

Pyrrho

Audioholic Ninja
Thanks for all the responses. To answer some of the questions;
Room = 14 x 24x 8
I listen to a lot of 60s and 70s top 40 (rock) music and some classical type music (I love the sound track for Master and Commander) and some stuff form the “Big Band Era”.
If I get the right sound I really don’t care if I have a sub or not when listening to music (movies are a different matter).
The speakers are on one end wall, in the corners, with curtains behind them and that’s pretty much where they will have to stay.
I sit at the opposite end of the room approximately 21 feet from the speakers.
Aesthetic = Some of the medium or darker wood grain (like the old CS-99s) would be nice but the Bose are flat black and they work ok so either will be acceptable.
I suppose if I get caught up in the whole idea of upgrading my sound system I would be willing to spend more but realistically I hope to stay around $400.00 for the two main speakers.
I don’t listen to any LPs and haven’t for years. I do still have a turntable but it’s in the attic and I don’t even know for sure if it still works. Everything I listen to now is either store bought CDs a few CDs that friends have copied and given to me and a few 100 songs from iTunes. As a matter of fact most of the music I’ve listened to in the past few months is stuff I loaded on to a thumb drive and play through my Blu-ray player. It consists of the 60s and 70s music I bought from iTunes and my CDs I had loaded in to my iTunes account. As I listened to these songs, some I hadn’t heard in years, it slowly occurred to me that I just really wasn’t really happy with the way it sounded. The songs just didn’t seem the same as I remembered them. Now, the more I listen to any music through my system the more I get convinced that I’m not happy with the sound. It really doesn’t matter if I’m listening to the thumb drive, a CD, classical stuff on the net radio, or some rock music over the traditional (air) FM radio. I hope this helps.

You have two significant changes, the source and the speakers. Both can significantly affect the sound you hear, so it is not at all surprising that things don't sound the way you remember them sounding.

Often, with rereleases of old material, the master tapes were not well stored, and so the source used for CD (or whatever) might be inferior to what was used for the original LP release. Or during the mastering process, the new release might be made with different ideas about what the thing should sound like, so they may apply equalization or reverb or whatever differently from what was applied for the original release. Also, the LP colors the sound with its added distortion, so an LP is not going to sound like a CD, unless the CD is a copy of an LP.

Different speakers typically sound different, and so when you play things you used to hear on your Pioneer CS-99 speakers, even if you used the same source (which you are not), the sound will be different if the speakers are different. "Different", of course, could be better, worse or just different.

$400 is not a lot for main speakers. If we factored in inflation, your old CS-99 speakers were a lot more expensive than that; according to this site, they were $215 and made from 1970-1975 (I don't know if that is each or for the pair [though it is probably each], so we can guess why you are not liking modern gear so much, since you are comparing cheap modern stuff with expensive old stuff; to give you some perspective, in the early 1970's, you could buy a brand new Porsche for $4,000, and it now costs more than 10 times that to get one).
 
M

merlin1952

Audioholic Intern
First off let me say that I do understand about the re-mastering of the older music. {I purchased several songs from iTunes that I realized afterwards were obviously different recordings, though by the same artist (that’s why I hate iTunes 20 second snip-it I would like to hear the entire song)}. So I have taken that in to account however the difference I’m trying to explain is more subtle. I’m concerned here that I’m really not communicating very well with everyone. Perhaps a better way to describe it is to say that the music sounds mechanical, no warmth to it. Anyway, I know $400 isn’t a lot for two speakers and I’m not looking for miracles but I feel sure I can get something, with everyone’s help that will serve me better. Just a side note here but I’m in the process of getting a workshop built out back that will have a den (actually more of a “man cave”) up stairs and that is where I hope to do my serious music listening in maybe 18 months. The construction hopefully won’t take that long (I sure hope it doesn’t anyway) but it will take me a while to acquire the sound system and big screen TV. In some ways this should serve as a helpful learning process that will benefit me when I start shopping for the components I’ll need for that project. I’m not sure I’d describe the sound from my Bose as “speakers with a blanket thrown over them” but I will admit I do keep thinking back to that description.
(How far apart are the two front channel speakers?) The room is 14’ wide and the Bose set in the corners so roughly 12’ apart.
(Maybe you are looking for something more in life.) I’m still scratching my head over that one. Are you possibly suggesting that I need to leave the 60s in the 60s and move on or are you referring to my stereo components or maybe just my life in general? (LOL)
I had never really thought about it but I do see the comparison between the Bose and the CS-99s. In their day the Pioneer’s were a more expensive speaker than my Bose. FYI I do still own the CS-99s I’ve “LOANED” them to my son. I’m seriously considering asking him if he’d like to become the proud owner of some Bose speakers. Though I hadn’t made a comparison between the two sets of speakers I did realize that in their day the Pioneers were respectable speakers. However, when I decided to replace those components (the old Pioneer amp and the CS-99s) I just assumed that in the 30 years or so that had passed there had been many technological improvements so all I needed to do was go buy some decent components and I’d be set. I did try to listen to different speakers at Best Buy and Circuit City but the environments there was nothing like my home environment so nothing was really gained there in my opinion. Admittedly though, because of the influence from the friend I wrote about before with the 901s I suspect I subconsciously favored the Bose.
Anyway, I hope I have adequately answered at least a few of your questions. I look forward to reading everyone’s responses. Thanks
 
zieglj01

zieglj01

Audioholic Spartan
First off let me say that I do understand about the re-mastering of the older music. {I purchased several songs from iTunes that I realized afterwards were obviously different recordings, though by the same artist (that’s why I hate iTunes 20 second snip-it I would like to hear the entire song)}. So I have taken that in to account however the difference I’m trying to explain is more subtle. I’m concerned here that I’m really not communicating very well with everyone. Perhaps a better way to describe it is to say that the music sounds mechanical, no warmth to it. Anyway, I know $400 isn’t a lot for two speakers and I’m not looking for miracles but I feel sure I can get something, with everyone’s help that will serve me better. Just a side note here but I’m in the process of getting a workshop built out back that will have a den (actually more of a “man cave”) up stairs and that is where I hope to do my serious music listening in maybe 18 months. The construction hopefully won’t take that long (I sure hope it doesn’t anyway) but it will take me a while to acquire the sound system and big screen TV. In some ways this should serve as a helpful learning process that will benefit me when I start shopping for the components I’ll need for that project. I’m not sure I’d describe the sound from my Bose as “speakers with a blanket thrown over them” but I will admit I do keep thinking back to that description.
(How far apart are the two front channel speakers?) The room is 14’ wide and the Bose set in the corners so roughly 12’ apart.
(Maybe you are looking for something more in life.) I’m still scratching my head over that one. Are you possibly suggesting that I need to leave the 60s in the 60s and move on or are you referring to my stereo components or maybe just my life in general? (LOL)
I had never really thought about it but I do see the comparison between the Bose and the CS-99s. In their day the Pioneer’s were a more expensive speaker than my Bose. FYI I do still own the CS-99s I’ve “LOANED” them to my son. I’m seriously considering asking him if he’d like to become the proud owner of some Bose speakers. Though I hadn’t made a comparison between the two sets of speakers I did realize that in their day the Pioneers were respectable speakers. However, when I decided to replace those components (the old Pioneer amp and the CS-99s) I just assumed that in the 30 years or so that had passed there had been many technological improvements so all I needed to do was go buy some decent components and I’d be set. I did try to listen to different speakers at Best Buy and Circuit City but the environments there was nothing like my home environment so nothing was really gained there in my opinion. Admittedly though, because of the influence from the friend I wrote about before with the 901s I suspect I subconsciously favored the Bose.
Anyway, I hope I have adequately answered at least a few of your questions. I look forward to reading everyone’s responses. Thanks
You are becoming a member of a group of what is known as the Audioholic
World. Some would call this a disease. Yes, a lot of music does not sound
right. It is mechanical or artifical. The good quality recordings are in the
minority. Music tends to be tilted up as in the past or compressed as it is
today. I listen to music on CD's played back over quality equipment. That
does not quarantee that it will sound real good - It all goes back to the
recording - a poor recording will be highlighted on quality equipment. If it
is not on CD, DVD or BLU-RAY - I don't listen to it. I do want down loaded
or copied music. I have switched to mainly Jazz and Orchestra and New
Age Jazz music - As I feel that it is recorded better (no disrespect intended)
I still like classic rock and the music of the 80's and 90's. I still like the Beatles.
With all due respect I would upgrade your speakers and place them better in
your room. If you are going to wait awhile - then get a pair of good quality
headphones. You are still looking for something more in life - so maybe you
will have to start scratching your head on the other side!
 
Last edited:
Pyrrho

Pyrrho

Audioholic Ninja
First off let me say that I do understand about the re-mastering of the older music. {I purchased several songs from iTunes that I realized afterwards were obviously different recordings, though by the same artist (that’s why I hate iTunes 20 second snip-it I would like to hear the entire song)}. So I have taken that in to account however the difference I’m trying to explain is more subtle. I’m concerned here that I’m really not communicating very well with everyone. Perhaps a better way to describe it is to say that the music sounds mechanical, no warmth to it.

Try turning down the treble slightly and see if you like that better. (Rather strangely, some "audiophiles" have an aversion to tone controls, and prefer to buy speakers that distort the frequency response to their tastes instead.)

Another source of "warmth" are certain kinds of distortion, which are added by records, but are not added by CDs or digital audio.


Anyway, I know $400 isn’t a lot for two speakers and I’m not looking for miracles but I feel sure I can get something, with everyone’s help that will serve me better.

What I recommend that you do is go to whatever audio stores are in your area, leaving your money and credit cards at home, and listen to what they have in your price range. After that, visit people locally you find via Craigslist (or newspaper ads or whatever) and listen to the used speakers that they are selling in your price range (but first search online for information about the speakers before you even contact them, as you don't want to waste your time or the time of the seller if there is no chance that you are going to want the speakers in question). If you don't like the used speakers, don't buy them, but if you prefer them to whatever you find new, go ahead. You can always try to find some Pioneer CS-99 speakers, and you should be able to easily get them in your price range if any are available locally (though by now the foam around the tweeter is shot, and should be repaired, which can be done by someone like this; I had the tweeters from a pair of CS-99 speakers repaired by them, and the results were good). But I think you can find better speakers for $400.


Just a side note here but I’m in the process of getting a workshop built out back that will have a den (actually more of a “man cave”) up stairs and that is where I hope to do my serious music listening in maybe 18 months. The construction hopefully won’t take that long (I sure hope it doesn’t anyway) but it will take me a while to acquire the sound system and big screen TV. In some ways this should serve as a helpful learning process that will benefit me when I start shopping for the components I’ll need for that project. I’m not sure I’d describe the sound from my Bose as “speakers with a blanket thrown over them” but I will admit I do keep thinking back to that description.
(How far apart are the two front channel speakers?) The room is 14’ wide and the Bose set in the corners so roughly 12’ apart.

Normally, speakers do not sound their best in the corners. Try them away from the side walls (though if the Bose manual tells you differently, follow their advice, as they probably will help you get the best sound you can out of them).

Normally, it is best to have one's speakers and oneself form an approximately equilateral triangle, with each speaker at one of the corners (of the imaginary triangle, not the room), and you at the third corner. This, however, is only an approximation, and some designs are made for different uses than others (for example, some speakers are designed to be against the wall behind them, while others are designed to be out in the room; most sound best out in the room, but you probably want to follow the advice in the manual).

Normally, speakers should be facing you, and they should be positioned such that the tweeter is at or near ear level (of the listening position). But, again, sometimes something a bit different may be better, and in almost all cases, a manufacturer will be giving good advice in the manual for positioning the speakers.


(Maybe you are looking for something more in life.) I’m still scratching my head over that one. Are you possibly suggesting that I need to leave the 60s in the 60s and move on or are you referring to my stereo components or maybe just my life in general? (LOL)
I had never really thought about it but I do see the comparison between the Bose and the CS-99s. In their day the Pioneer’s were a more expensive speaker than my Bose. FYI I do still own the CS-99s I’ve “LOANED” them to my son.

You might want to remove the front covers (there are screws in the grill near the four corners) and take a look at the surround around the cone tweeters. They are made of foam in the CS-99 (though not in the CS-99A), and by now, they are almost certainly cracked and falling apart. They might still seem to sound okay, but they should be repaired. Here is a link to a place that can do that:

http://www.millersound.net/service.htm

Please note, I am not affiliated with them in any way, so I offer no guarantees; I am simply a satisfied customer.

There are, of course, other places that can replace the foam around the tweeters, though I have only used Millersound for such things.

The CS-99 was unusual in that way, as most tweeters do not have foam surrounds, and if foam is used in a speaker, it is usually on a woofer and/or midrange. Fortunately, the CS-99 has longer lasting surrounds on the drivers other than the tweeter.


I’m seriously considering asking him if he’d like to become the proud owner of some Bose speakers. Though I hadn’t made a comparison between the two sets of speakers I did realize that in their day the Pioneers were respectable speakers.

You should do a direct comparison. It will be informative for you. If, however, both you and your son prefer the Pioneer speakers (which is very possible), he may not like that you are taking them away from him.


However, when I decided to replace those components (the old Pioneer amp and the CS-99s) I just assumed that in the 30 years or so that had passed there had been many technological improvements so all I needed to do was go buy some decent components and I’d be set.

There have been significant improvements in most speakers since then, so your thinking is not totally wrong, but comparing a relatively expensive old one to a new inexpensive one is not going to be a fair comparison. Think about the advances in cars since then, but then compare a 1973 Mercedes in excellent condition to a current bottom of the line economy car of some lesser brand. No doubt, there may be advantages to the new one, but it isn't likely to be better in every way. That is the sort of comparison you are doing with these speakers.


I did try to listen to different speakers at Best Buy and Circuit City but the environments there was nothing like my home environment so nothing was really gained there in my opinion. Admittedly though, because of the influence from the friend I wrote about before with the 901s I suspect I subconsciously favored the Bose.
Anyway, I hope I have adequately answered at least a few of your questions. I look forward to reading everyone’s responses. Thanks

At your budget, I would be looking at used speakers, though I would not be looking for speakers quite as old as the Pioneer CS-99. But first do the direct comparison between your Bose speakers and your Pioneer speakers that are loaned out to your son. It may be that you will prefer some aspects of each over the other, or perhaps you will just think one sounds better in every way. But it will be a start for thinking about the differences in sound that different speakers make, and it will help get you thinking about what qualities in a speaker matter most to you. At $400 for the pair, unless you are very lucky in a used purchase of a speaker worth more than you pay, you are going to have considerable compromises that you will need to accept. But even if you had unlimited money, there is no such thing as a perfect speaker, so it is always a question of which virtues one requires and which vices one can live with. And since different people require different virtues and tolerate different vices differently, there is no particular speaker that can be pointed to that will be the best according to everyone. This is why listening is best, though obviously in a store like Best Buy, there is often no really good way to audition speakers.
 
zieglj01

zieglj01

Audioholic Spartan
Compromise is the name of the game. I hope you will at least begin
to audition speakers - it can be an eye opener. The Bose should not
be against the corner - the tweeters need air space. With a room
your size - the speakers need to be placed to where the tweeters
are facing inside. Try 10 feet apart from one another and sit 10 feet
back, if you can. The tweeters in the 301 can be a little annoying -
you may have to turn the treble down.
 
zieglj01

zieglj01

Audioholic Spartan
It all goes back to the recording - a poor recording will be highlighted on quality equipment. If it is not on CD, DVD or BLU-RAY - I don't listen to it. I do want down loaded or copied music.
I meant to say - I don't want down loaded or copied music.
 
sholling

sholling

Audioholic Ninja
I don't see how 901s can sound worth a darn in a corner. They were designed to send most of their energy to the rear and have it reflect off a wall running parallel with the speakers, and to have a whole lot of room around them. That corner is almost certainly massively distorting the sound with reflections going every which way. No wonder you're unhappy with the sound.

Second the speakers should be the same distance apart from the each other as they are from you. You're going to have to compromise a bit if you want the system to sound good. Either move the Bose to a side and your seating position up closer, or replace the speakers and move up closer.
 
M

merlin1952

Audioholic Intern
First let me clarify that I do not nor have I ever owned Bose 901s I am currently using a set of Bose 301s. It’s probably a minor point as I believe they both utilize the reflective method of sound distribution.
Secondly let me state that the speakers, whatever speakers I use in this room, will need to be near the corners of that end wall. I’ll describe the wall from left to right. Corner, 12” of wall (with the right half covered by curtain) then 40” (floor to ceiling) window, then a center section of wall (totally covered by my entertainment center), another 40” (floor to ceiling) window, then another 12” of wall (with the left half covered by curtain), then the other corner. I really don’t want the speakers setting in front of the windows (neither does my wife) so I really have no options as far as speaker placement is concerned. Also, it’s not likely that we will rearrange the room in such a way that allows me to sit closer to the speakers (or the TV).
I was asked early on about listening levels and I never did respond. I’m not exactly sure how to answer that as one man’s loud could easily be another’s low, or normal. I never rattle the windows, I do listen to some stuff louder than others and sometimes you can easily hear it all over the house but I never have to worry about neighbors complaining, it doesn’t get that loud. I don’t try to replicate being front row at a live rock concert.
I am convinced that a different set (type) of speakers would serve me better. There isn’t much of anything I can do to change the room layout so I’ll have to get speakers that will accommodate the room. So now it’s just a matter of finding the set that sounds best to me and fits my budget. One thought though is that if I use bookshelf speakers I’ll want to have them on stands perhaps even reuse the Bose stands which means the speakers would be lying on their side. Thanks again to everyone for their assistance!
 
I

InTheIndustry

Senior Audioholic
Thanks for all the responses. To answer some of the questions;
Room = 14 x 24x 8
I listen to a lot of 60s and 70s top 40 (rock) music and some classical type music (I love the sound track for Master and Commander) and some stuff form the “Big Band Era”.
If I get the right sound I really don’t care if I have a sub or not when listening to music (movies are a different matter).
The speakers are on one end wall, in the corners, with curtains behind them and that’s pretty much where they will have to stay.
I sit at the opposite end of the room approximately 21 feet from the speakers.
Aesthetic = Some of the medium or darker wood grain (like the old CS-99s) would be nice but the Bose are flat black and they work ok so either will be acceptable.
I suppose if I get caught up in the whole idea of upgrading my sound system I would be willing to spend more but realistically I hope to stay around $400.00 for the two main speakers.
I don’t listen to any LPs and haven’t for years. I do still have a turntable but it’s in the attic and I don’t even know for sure if it still works. Everything I listen to now is either store bought CDs a few CDs that friends have copied and given to me and a few 100 songs from iTunes. As a matter of fact most of the music I’ve listened to in the past few months is stuff I loaded on to a thumb drive and play through my Blu-ray player. It consists of the 60s and 70s music I bought from iTunes and my CDs I had loaded in to my iTunes account. As I listened to these songs, some I hadn’t heard in years, it slowly occurred to me that I just really wasn’t really happy with the way it sounded. The songs just didn’t seem the same as I remembered them. Now, the more I listen to any music through my system the more I get convinced that I’m not happy with the sound. It really doesn’t matter if I’m listening to the thumb drive, a CD, classical stuff on the net radio, or some rock music over the traditional (air) FM radio. I hope this helps.
First off let me say that I do understand about the re-mastering of the older music. {I purchased several songs from iTunes that I realized afterwards were obviously different recordings, though by the same artist (that’s why I hate iTunes 20 second snip-it I would like to hear the entire song)}. So I have taken that in to account however the difference I’m trying to explain is more subtle. I’m concerned here that I’m really not communicating very well with everyone. Perhaps a better way to describe it is to say that the music sounds mechanical, no warmth to it. Anyway, I know $400 isn’t a lot for two speakers and I’m not looking for miracles but I feel sure I can get something, with everyone’s help that will serve me better. Just a side note here but I’m in the process of getting a workshop built out back that will have a den (actually more of a “man cave”) up stairs and that is where I hope to do my serious music listening in maybe 18 months. The construction hopefully won’t take that long (I sure hope it doesn’t anyway) but it will take me a while to acquire the sound system and big screen TV. In some ways this should serve as a helpful learning process that will benefit me when I start shopping for the components I’ll need for that project. I’m not sure I’d describe the sound from my Bose as “speakers with a blanket thrown over them” but I will admit I do keep thinking back to that description.
(How far apart are the two front channel speakers?) The room is 14’ wide and the Bose set in the corners so roughly 12’ apart.
(Maybe you are looking for something more in life.) I’m still scratching my head over that one. Are you possibly suggesting that I need to leave the 60s in the 60s and move on or are you referring to my stereo components or maybe just my life in general? (LOL)
I had never really thought about it but I do see the comparison between the Bose and the CS-99s. In their day the Pioneer’s were a more expensive speaker than my Bose. FYI I do still own the CS-99s I’ve “LOANED” them to my son. I’m seriously considering asking him if he’d like to become the proud owner of some Bose speakers. Though I hadn’t made a comparison between the two sets of speakers I did realize that in their day the Pioneers were respectable speakers. However, when I decided to replace those components (the old Pioneer amp and the CS-99s) I just assumed that in the 30 years or so that had passed there had been many technological improvements so all I needed to do was go buy some decent components and I’d be set. I did try to listen to different speakers at Best Buy and Circuit City but the environments there was nothing like my home environment so nothing was really gained there in my opinion. Admittedly though, because of the influence from the friend I wrote about before with the 901s I suspect I subconsciously favored the Bose.
Anyway, I hope I have adequately answered at least a few of your questions. I look forward to reading everyone’s responses. Thanks
First let me clarify that I do not nor have I ever owned Bose 901s I am currently using a set of Bose 301s. It’s probably a minor point as I believe they both utilize the reflective method of sound distribution.
Secondly let me state that the speakers, whatever speakers I use in this room, will need to be near the corners of that end wall. I’ll describe the wall from left to right. Corner, 12” of wall (with the right half covered by curtain) then 40” (floor to ceiling) window, then a center section of wall (totally covered by my entertainment center), another 40” (floor to ceiling) window, then another 12” of wall (with the left half covered by curtain), then the other corner. I really don’t want the speakers setting in front of the windows (neither does my wife) so I really have no options as far as speaker placement is concerned. Also, it’s not likely that we will rearrange the room in such a way that allows me to sit closer to the speakers (or the TV).
I was asked early on about listening levels and I never did respond. I’m not exactly sure how to answer that as one man’s loud could easily be another’s low, or normal. I never rattle the windows, I do listen to some stuff louder than others and sometimes you can easily hear it all over the house but I never have to worry about neighbors complaining, it doesn’t get that loud. I don’t try to replicate being front row at a live rock concert.
I am convinced that a different set (type) of speakers would serve me better. There isn’t much of anything I can do to change the room layout so I’ll have to get speakers that will accommodate the room. So now it’s just a matter of finding the set that sounds best to me and fits my budget. One thought though is that if I use bookshelf speakers I’ll want to have them on stands perhaps even reuse the Bose stands which means the speakers would be lying on their side. Thanks again to everyone for their assistance!

I've been mulling your 1st response over in my head off and on since I 1st read it yesterday morning. Now, with the additional information, I have to say you're just not going to make it happen very easily. At least not with brand new speakers. Your budget just wont allow that to happen. The cherry on top is that even if you were willing to throw more equipment money at the problem, your room is brutal.

That being said, there's a bit of a light at the end of the tunnel! Usually I wouldn't recommend it because the results can be a Pandora’s box, but look at used towers. I would STRONGLY recommend DCM DCM10 or DCM12 towers.
Here is a link to the manual (with pics) http://www.dcmspeakers.com/manuals/DCM121066C.pdf

My brief history lesson on them:
These were sold at Circuit City in the early 2000's and should easily go for under $400 for the pair. New these were around 400-$600 at most. They will play incredibly well at low volumes but also be able to make you feel the music should you want a concert experience. I can vouch for their sound quality. They are phenomenal speakers that left an impression on me that I remember to this day, which is funny for me to say that. I deal in mid to high-end audio on a custom level and am putting in a show room next month - FINALLY - with a $50K theater in it (half of which being the audio/speaker components). In other words home theater, music, A/V, etc. is my life and I’m a very harsh critic of the market place. To me, these speakers are the equivalent of the least attractive girl at the party, but that's OK because she can really dance. I was very sad when DCM discontinued these after such a short shelf life. I was broke back then (was in my early 20s) and didn't have the $300-$400 to get a pair. I liked the 10s better than the 12s, but in your bigger room either will work fine.

For the past few years I've scoured the internet every so often to try to find someone with a babied pair just so I can have them to goof off with. These aren't the pinnacle of audio perfection, but they have a shockingly good sound to them at all volume levels - even with the most modest of power. You could say that these are my Rosebud & I would put them in my listening room in an instant as a sort of trophy.

Your receiver is fine. Most of your music (digital or not) is probably fine. But your room layout, seating distance, & budget are a murderer's row for what your goals are. I would start at the DCM10 or 12 models.

Hope this helps!

EDIT: This is a great day! Your post inspired me to keep searching. I just bought a pair off a guy on Craigslist for $175. Picking up tomorrow after a 4 hour drive across the state. I feel like I've finally caught my White Wale. I'll follow up with pics and listening impressions later this week. As an experiment, I have a room that's 12' wide x 19' long w/ 9' ceilings I will set these up in and let you know how they do.
 
Last edited:
M

merlin1952

Audioholic Intern
InTheIndustry and everyone, thanks for all the information and suggestions. I did search around for some DCM 10s and 12s last evening but didn’t find any within driving distance. I would definitely prefer to audition them before purchasing.
InTheIndustry, congratulations on scoring the DCMs. I’m glad I could help (LOL).
Pyrrho, now that you mention it I’m not so sure that my old Pioneer speakers aren’t the CS-99As. I’ll have to check with my son and find out. Was the CS-99A a significant improvement over the CS-99 or just the next incarnation? Coincidentally I did happen to find a pair of CS-99As about 5 hours drive from here while I was searching things yesterday.
I’m not trying to change the rules in the middle of the game or anything but I am curious. What, if anything, would everyone be recommending for maybe twice my budget ($800.00)? That’s not likely to happen though because as I wrote early on I am in the process of having a new private space built where I’ll be able to set up a nice little sound system and TV.
Once again, thanks to everyone!
 
Pyrrho

Pyrrho

Audioholic Ninja
InTheIndustry and everyone, thanks for all the information and suggestions. I did search around for some DCM 10s and 12s last evening but didn’t find any within driving distance. I would definitely prefer to audition them before purchasing.
InTheIndustry, congratulations on scoring the DCMs. I’m glad I could help (LOL).
Pyrrho, now that you mention it I’m not so sure that my old Pioneer speakers aren’t the CS-99As. I’ll have to check with my son and find out. Was the CS-99A a significant improvement over the CS-99 or just the next incarnation? Coincidentally I did happen to find a pair of CS-99As about 5 hours drive from here while I was searching things yesterday.
I’m not trying to change the rules in the middle of the game or anything but I am curious. What, if anything, would everyone be recommending for maybe twice my budget ($800.00)? That’s not likely to happen though because as I wrote early on I am in the process of having a new private space built where I’ll be able to set up a nice little sound system and TV.
Once again, thanks to everyone!
The CS-99A has different drivers, but it is the replacement model for the CS-99. They are comparable speakers, but I have not heard them side by side, so I cannot say which is better. Presumably, they are a slight improvement, but presumption often gets one into trouble. The CS-99A has the advantage of not having foam surround on any of the drivers, and it also has a wood veneer on the front, so that people who like to take off the grills to listen (I don't recommend that, as grills protect drivers from damage) generally prefer them. That means that they tend to sell for more money.

Here you can read what some other people say about them:

http://www.audiokarma.org/forums/showthread.php?t=8096

According to one person who claims to own both, they sound the same.


The Pioneer CS-63DX was a higher model that had similiar drivers (which may seem odd, given that most of the Pioneer models at that time had bigger numbers if they were higher in the lineup). I like it best of these three, as it has deeper bass largely due to its larger cabinet. It also does not have foam surrounds on any of the drivers.

According to this:

http://akdatabase.org/Pioneer/Speaker Systems.htm

The CS-63DX was made from 1970-1979, which is a pretty impressive time period for one speaker to be made. Ironically, probably because it is bigger (so shipping it anywhere would be quite expensive), it can often be had for the same or even less than the CS-99 or CS-99A.


If one had a budget of $800, the field opens up quite a bit. If buying new, I would consider the Magnepan MMG at $600:

http://www.magnepan.com/model_MMG

It is a very different speaker from the Pioneer speakers, and has a more "refined" sound. But it also has its disadvantages, as it will produce less bass, is less efficient, is 4 ohms (so some amplifiers are not suitable for use with them), and cannot play as loud (those Pioneers will play loud enough to damage your hearing in a normal room, so that is not necessarily a problem). But I would gladly trade away those things for the sound of the Magnepans.

I would also consider trying to get my hands on the Aurum Cantus Leisure 2SE, preferably the superior U.S. version (it is easy to get the international version at that price or less, and is worth considering as well). Unfortunately, finding a dealer is near impossible, so one would tend to be buying without hearing them first. However, I own some of these speakers, and if you wish, you can send me a PM and tell me where you live (just major city area and state; I don't need your actual address), and I will tell you if you are close enough to me for that to be reasonably possible. But you can read a review of the international version to get some idea of what these are like:

http://www.kellsieavdesign.com/Leisure2SE_Review.PDF

Basically, the Leisure 2SE is also a more "refined" speaker than those old Pioneer models, but it also gives up some bass, though much, much less than you would probably expect considering the size of its woofer. I have listened to a pair of the U.S. version of this speaker side by side with the Pioneer CS-99, and it almost keeps up in the bass. It is an easy 8 ohm load, of normal efficiency (so not as efficient as those old Pioneers), so it can be used with virtually any amplifier. They also are small, so they will fit almost anywhere, and have just about the best fit and finish of any speaker you will ever find at any price.

Whether either of those would suit you or not is hard to tell, as that will depend upon what qualities in a speaker matter to you.
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top