ZFS for storage server

BoredSysAdmin

BoredSysAdmin

Audioholic Slumlord
Warning : Below thread is not meant for average Joe, unless you know what SAN or iSCSI means - please ignore this one.

Hey Guys, I'd like to share pretty new way/technology to organize your storage system without the need for expensive hardware raid cards, while providing superior performance (easy four times faster at same price) and features found only in enterprise level SAN.

It's called ZFS (Zetabyte file system) originally developed by SUN and was put out into the wild with openSolaris project (now closed), but like any great technology, once it's been freed - you just can't put the genie back into the bottle and there plenty of people and companies highly interesting in this.

In fact it's so good, NetApp Sued Sun for ZFS Patent Infringement, because comparing core features - you essentially getting most of Netapp WALF Ontap system in addition with even higher scalability.

Here is a tons of reads:
http://blogs.oracle.com/ahrens/entry/what_is_zfs
http://www.anandtech.com/show/3963/zfs-building-testing-and-benchmarking/1
http://www.zfsbuild.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS

Here are few system using ZFS:
https://sites.google.com/site/eonstorage/
http://www.nexenta.org/ and http://www.nexentastor.org/
(Core has all most features, but no gui, while community ed. has a gui, but limited features and limited at 18 TB (Raw)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenIndiana

Oracle now converted openSolaris to Solaris Express 11 which should be free for non-commercial use.

a Few of mentioned system don't include gui and this is where this little plug-in comes in:
http://www.napp-it.org/index_en.html

bottom line: Yes - you can make a kick-***, super reliable, fast and flexible storage at home without using expensive components.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
3db

3db

Audioholic Slumlord
I'm using it at my place of employment. To date, its been the best filesystem type I ever worked with bar none.
 
BoredSysAdmin

BoredSysAdmin

Audioholic Slumlord
I'm using it at my place of employment. To date, its been the best filesystem type I ever worked with bar none.
Oh, Actual user - I'll ask you tons of question soon...
I'm using Netapp filers with WALF system - it is pretty good and have very good client os integration, but it's anything but free
 
jinjuku

jinjuku

Moderator
NTFS has been working fine for my home use for years. Not sure what EXT3, ZFS or any other filing system is going to do for me in a home environment.

But it does have geek-chic factor.
 
BoredSysAdmin

BoredSysAdmin

Audioholic Slumlord
NTFS has been working fine for my home use for years. Not sure what EXT3, ZFS or any other filing system is going to do for me in a home environment.

But it does have geek-chic factor.
ZFS is not just file system like ext or ntfs - it's also a volume manager - basically it will manage multiple disks in raid like array

Benefits for home user? well besides it's nerd-appeal, it's ability to use both pc's ram (everything minus 1gb for OS) and ssd drive(s) for caching data - this is what basically makes the big performance difference
 
sholling

sholling

Audioholic Ninja
It looks really cool for a data center. Unfortunately I need to run windows on my server.
 
sholling

sholling

Audioholic Ninja
"my server" - you mean home or work one?
why need for windows?
It's for home - I haven't worked in years. I've never been a UNIX guy and when I was stilling working for a Fortune 500 we always a couple of propeller beanie types for that. Professionally I started with Novell 3.x back in the day and then went to Windows servers back when they were the new thing. But the main thing for me (besides already owning a Win 7 license) is the application that I want to run to serve up 32bit audio and my videos. Otherwise I'd probably play with something like that just for fun.
 
Last edited:
BoredSysAdmin

BoredSysAdmin

Audioholic Slumlord
It's for home - I haven't worked in years. I've never been a UNIX guy and when I was stilling working for a Fortune 500 we always a couple of propeller beanie types for that. Professionally I started with Novell 3.x back in the day and then went to Windows servers back when they were the new thing. But the main thing for me (besides already owning a Win 7 license) is the application that I want to run to serve up 32bit audio and my videos. Otherwise I'd probably play with something like that just for fun.
I'm not so much linux guy myself, but hopefully the end result for me will end with some sort of gui and not pure command line..
Speaking of media streaming, there is http://mediatomb.cc/ plugin for that...

I do know building a linux box would be changing for me, but honestly i'm getting sick and tired from microsoft software...

I love my droid phone (I wish it would be faster) it's openness and flexibility is something I really enjoy.
 
sholling

sholling

Audioholic Ninja
Google is likely to own Microsoft one day. Microsoft kept their prices way too high for way too long while producing buggy bloatware.

Now that I'm happy with my HTPC and my server I'm holding off on more tech until Amazon releases the Hollywood tablet. I'm a Kindle Addict and I have high hopes that Amazon will hit one out of the park. :D
 
3db

3db

Audioholic Slumlord
I HATE GUI's .... being a UNIX guy myself :p

Command line all the way. :)
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top