
I disagree.Take look at the frequency response of Wilson speakers, particularily the Watt Puuppy. At $200K I would expect a linear response but I can gather a dozen speakers in the $700 to $1500 dollar range that measure much flatter and have a better off axes response. Audiophiles are NOT helping there very much. Another example is the Lexicon knock off of the Oppo. Its $4500 dollars more than the Oppo and I fail to see that a Lexicon face pllate would make it sound better other than to audiophiles.All criticisms of audiophiles aside... it's because of them that we are not flooded with more poorly made or mediocre A/V equipment than we already are.
The audiophiles and the specialized manufacturers with their stringent demands over the years have upped the bar and forced the large mainstream manufacturers and recording companies to put out better product than they otherwise might have.
... and I for one thank them for that.![]()
I don't think we really have much to thank them for. Most of my contact with the ap world includes contact with very simple components that, but some sort of magic and wizardry becomes extremely expensive. Turntables for vinyl records use 60 year old technology. Simple tub amps have been around for just as long. Speaker designs are usually quite conservative; basically none of this stuff contributes anything to advancing audio technology or spins down to the mid-end because what's unique about the components is not their design but their purported execution, like $500 wires. The mid-end is usually very similar to the low end but bigger and better while the high end is like the stuff we had decades ago, just with a amazing price.All criticisms of audiophiles aside... it's because of them that we are not flooded with more poorly made or mediocre A/V equipment than we already are.
The audiophiles and the specialized manufacturers with their stringent demands over the years have upped the bar and forced the large mainstream manufacturers and recording companies to put out better product than they otherwise might have.
... and I for one thank them for that.![]()
"what's wrong with marketers exploiting the mentally defective."This question could be re-phrased to read, what's wrong with marketers exploiting the mentally defective. Take any advertising headline which uses the word audiophile and replace the word with something like obsessive/compulsive, manic depressed, or anal retentive and you'll understand the brilliance of the marketing guy who coined the word audiophile.