What does truth finding sources like Audioholics say about Preamps ?

F

fmw

Audioholic Ninja
A pre-amplifier is a trivial thing to design to be perfectly transparent to human ears. I can (literally) take $15-$20 worth of parts(and this is at low volume pricing such as available to a DIYer) and assemble a pre-amplifier that is of very low noise and distortion(far below audibility on both counts).

Most decent receivers will have low noise pre-amp outs that will be transparent to human ears. There may be the occasional unit with an audible hiss. The placebo effect may be a common factor, and I suspect is the primary one, in people detecting [imaginary] differences.

I have perhaps the most absurd standards for audio quality possible, and these days I use an old HK AVR55 as my pre-amplifier. Why? It was cheap(found it in Goodwill for $25), it has digital readout 'dB' adjust numbers and is remote controlled. It has no self noise evident. I sold off my Stereophile Class B pre-amplifier a long time ago - the old HK receiver is a better pre-amplifier IMO(the receiver has digital volume readouts where as the Adcom GFP-750 did not).

-Chris
No question about it, Chris. What separates one receiver or preamp from another these days is the digital processor, not the audio chain. I've owned both competent and incompetent processors and therein lies the only reason to choose something because of the preamplifier. I once had a Stereophile Class A preamp, complete with 18 tubes. It produced the same sound in my system as any other preamp. It just cost more than others and required more maintenance. Well, it was nice looking also.
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top