annunaki said:
Actually, if test tones were used to output 100db at all frequencies (with an 80 hz crossover point) and a 12 db/oct slope is used the signal would still be at 94db at 120hz.
If a 24db oct slope is used (@80hz) it is still only -12db below the fundamental signal or 88db at 120hz.
If distortion is at an audible 10% it could probably still be heard at 120hz.
Well let's see. If a sub outputs 100db at all fequencies, then yes, it's output at 120hz will be 94dB. If THD is 10%, that means the sum of the harmonics is approximately 20dB below the fundamental. So that means the sum of the harmonics is a total of 26dB below the fundamental. Not to mention that your main speakers will have an output of 100dB at 120hz which will increase the difference even more. You are probably looking at around 30dB difference between total output and THD at 120hz.
Now looking at the two graphs again, we see that the original servo maxes out at about 95dB across the board. That is fairly low output. At 120hz, it does have a nice 1% THD.
Looking at the newer servo, it actually hits 95dB at 120hz with about 2% THD. At 97dB it's at 3% THD. Even at 100dB, THD is still less than 5% THD. Remember, the original servo cannot even hit 100dB at any frequency.
Now, 5% THD means the THD is about 25dB below the fundamental. Therefore we are talking about a total difference of close to 35dB between the fundamental and the harmonic at 120hz. Since every 10dB increase is perceived as double the volume, the fundamental is around eight times louder than the THD. Trust me, it will not be audible.