I find it interesting reading how much importance some people attribute to off-axis performance. Among the speakers I own, the ones that subjectively seem the most consistent on- and off-axis are among my worst sounding speakers. (The designers intended to have great off-axis performance, and thought that that was important in good speaker design. At least subjectively, they succeeded in achieving far off-axis sound that is very much like on-axis sound.)
Keep in mind that electrostats that you love are unique.
As dipole speakers, they have a somewhat figure 8 polar radiation pattern.
The well-off axis response is actually "canceled out", therefore it does not
reflect off of side walls and color the sound. In effect it sort of doubles as "a room treatment". If you sit at the sweet spot you get a great effect, but it won't be the widest sweet spot because as electrostats they essentially "beam" much of the sound.
On the other hand, with box speakers, the off axis response can make or break what you hear at the listening position. If it's similar, it adds to the realism. If it's dissimilar, it just colors the timbre. If it's too wide, the room can dominate depending on placement. If it's too narrow, the shift towards too wide as you go down in frequency causes an inconsistency. Well-controlled directivity is the key to getting good sound in an actual room without padding the first reflection points down with OC703. As you might know, too much absorption in a room can take away the feeling of a room being a real life place. Diffusion alone won't help you with a bad monopole speaker.
A dynamic dipole like a Perfect 8, NaO, or Linkwitz Orion, is of course, a marriage of the "best" of the two above sorts of speakers. The desired reflections contribute to realism, the sweet spot is wide, and the undesired reflections cancel out.
The tradeoff there is that you can't get the same output out of a dipole that you can out of a box speaker with the same drivers and amplification. Like any speaker, it's far from perfect. I would argue the biggest shortcoming is that there simply aren't really that many different choices on that front.
But you get my point. It's not so much the raw off axis response, but the polar behaviour and how it affects the room.
That's where horn loading probably also comes into play. Speakers like the Revel Salon2, Gedlee Summa, JBL Synthesis, and Behringer Truth use waveguides of sorts to control polar response while getting you the output of a monopole. Again, the goal is some level of CONTROl over directivity, not just the most dispersion.