The best speakers? You tell me.

[soniceuphoria]

I found these pics and thought you guys might get a kick out of them. Only if the girls came with the speakers I might be more inclined to purchase them. I found them on a high end audio showcase site. Check it out http://www.exoticaudio.org/index.html Happy listening.
Greg

 

[sjdgpt]

Since I dont get nothing like that at home, I thought I would vote for my favorite.... the girl on the left.

Now, if speakers were the only criteria, I would choose the set on the right.... Infinity RS


Now, to the serious part. This board is open to people of all ages.

And I mean all ages.

I don't think we should be posting such pictures on the board.


Besides, the W might get jealous if she knew what we was looking at in our spare time.

 

[Nomo]

I have to agree with Steven. My 11 eleven year old son could be viewing those pix.
'course if he was I would hope he'd go with the blonde.

 

[mtrycrafts]

I found these pics and thought you guys might get a kick out of them. Only if the girls came with the speakers I might be more inclined to purchase them. I found them on a high end audio showcase site. Check it out http://www.exoticaudio.org/index.html Happy listening.
Greg

I like this better

http://www.exoticaudio.org/PAGE32.html

 

[WmAx]

Now, to the serious part. This board is open to people of all ages.

And I mean all ages.

I don't think we should be posting such pictures on the board.

Frankly, I don't see a thing wrong with the human body. It's beautiful. It's not like these are pictures of humans during intercourse or other sexual activity.

-Chris

 

[sjdgpt]

Frankly, I don't see a thing wrong with the human body. It's beautiful. It's not like these are pictures of humans during intercourse or other sexual activity.

-Chris

Back when I was in high school I started a collection of National Geographic. Those photos were specifically made to show people in their natural state. My mother & father might have frown on my collection (as they could figure out my real purpose for the collection), but it was better that I collect NC, than another publication of the era.

The photos posted above were made specifically for adults, for a sexual or a humorous purpose. I like the photos.. but they are not in the same class of pictures as my collection of National Geographics.

I would have no problem letting my neighbor's 12ish boy and 14ish girl read my extensive collection of National Geographic. I would not want them to discover my collection of adult reading materials.

There is a difference.

 

[soniceuphoria]

Sorry to those the pictures were offensive to some of you. I had just figured that all the people posting on these forums were adults. I did not find the pictures to be distasteful seeing that they can show butts on tv and that the internet, like any tv with a v chip, can be controlled by parents, and any smart parent would set parental controls for their children blocking any and all forums, chat rooms, and personal messaging to protect their children from internet predators. All in all I think that there are worse things on the internet to worry yourself over than a few beautiful women paired with some beautiful speakers.
That is just my opinion, and if you disagree feel free to delete the pictures. Happy Listening.
Greg

 

[WmAx]

The photos posted above were made specifically for adults, for a sexual or a humorous purpose. I like the photos.. but they are not in the same class of pictures as my collection of National Geographics.

In what way were the pictures wrong? I did not see a girl masurbating herself with her legs spread open, I did not see a big ol' dildo flapping around anywhere, nor any other explicity sexual behaviour(s). If you want to ban stuff just because it might have some indirect sexual overtone(s), then that recent Burger King commercial with Hootie and the Bacon Cheddar Ranch Girls should be banned. What about Baywatch? Should Sports Illustrated be kept only behind the counter when the annual swim suit issue comes out? Or is your issue only present when the combination of nudity, slight sexual overtones(frankly, just about anything with an attractive female could be considered to have sexual 'overtones') and attractive females occurs simultaneously? Does it suddenly becomes 'wrong' in this case?

-Chris

 

[WmAx]

Sorry to those the pictures were offensive to some of you.

I don't see a cause to apologize to anyone -- not for those pictures. Note that if one took precautions in order to NOT offend anyone, then life would quickly be worth not living, since if you looked around, you would probably be able to find some particular person who will be offended by any particular thing that you could think of. If you had posted explicitly sexual pictures, then I would agree that they were inappropriate for the forum. Maybe if you posted the speaker-butt pictures at a Barney The Dinosaur forum or similar forum directed at small kids, they would be inappropriate -- as they would just be totally OT! But I don't see either of these as being the case.

-Chris

 

[soniceuphoria]

Thanks Chris for seeing it my way. I feel that anymore in our soicety we have come onto the rationalization that the beauty of the human body and sex are just a part of life. If you thought that those pictures were wrong then you haven't seen some of the sex education material they show now a days. And the fact is that they are starting these programs at younger and younger ages to keep children aware. I agree with Chris that if the pictures were sexually explicit (hardcore porn) then there might be cause for concern. Like I said before, I think the photos were tastefully done. I apologisied because I am a polite person and my intent was not to offend anyone by posting these pics, and I will leave the descion of wether the pics stay or go up to the moderators of these forums. I believe that they would probably agree with me that these are not obscene pictures. Thanks.
Greg

 

[Audioholics]

Realize that we don't like to censor people, but we simply don't have an area for this. So in the interest of protecting the little ones we'd like to keep this sort of stuff away from our forums.

I'm not really interested in the philiosophical debate on the beauty of the human body, just making sure Johnny doesn't see something his parent wouldn't like on my dime.

No hard feelings - just wanted to let you all know how we felt.