If you are only concerned about yourself as it seems you are
You don’t seem to be comprehending the basic HT principles at Ninja status. Well, enjoy yourself and pls don’t feel obligated to respond to my posts and then I will not have to do so, which honestly is making me feel disgusted.
your speaker is a tiny little box producing tiny little sound, just like all tinny little boxes. It’s like a little frog trying to blow itself up to become a big frog - but blew up in the process.
Stop blowing up your little box and acknowledge that it is a little one. But yourself a bit one if you want to show it around. Until then, yes, you will have a little one that measured well in 2006.
Just to finish - I would not take that speaker if someone offered me £1K
Jerry, u just too funny. Enjoy that little thing of yours and stop pretending it is a big thing. It’s really simple; just look at how small it really is. No trick or funny business. It’s such a small (and old?) thing so should be your expectation and experience.
In the modern world, we do have way better and bigger things to play with. Albeit they might be a bit more expensive than in 2006.
It's likely worth noting that these comments are in this thread, but the insults are about a topic in a different thread. So the attempts to flame bait with insults are about some KL-650-THX speakers that have not been mentioned (by me or anyone not Oddball) in this thread, presumably in some attempt to upset me(?).
@JerryLove - you should really stop being disruptive and play at least fair for the community. This is not your private garden regardless of your "Jedi", sorry "Ninja" status. This community is for me and my views as well as yours.
You might want to re-read the Audioholics motto: "pursuing truth in audio and video".
As per the above, and across several threads, you've been literally and clearly deliberately insulting. You are even attempting it here, bringing up my status when I haven't as though you are responding to an appeal to authority.
Revel center is the best center available at the given price range (and probably much more than that) and works as well as it can with big towers. This was verified by Audioholics review from people far more trustworthy than you, and without any personal agenda of blowing their small speakers to the stars.
You claimed that "No real need to get into graphs. It’s just about physics. Whoever tells me that 12kg centre box will work alongside 40kg tower has not tried a better way."
One company that is telling you that is Revel. Their center is half the weight of its matching towers.
So which is your position? Are you claiming that Revel is right (and your statement above is wrong), or that your statement above is right and Revel is wrong. You can't have both.
That's the topic: your unsupported and false claim that a 12kg center cannot work with a 40kg tower. That and your literal dismissal of evidence, in the same quote, as irrelevant to what you think you know. On a sight about truth, your claim of fact here is most certainly up for scrutiny.
And I've asked for the physics you are referring to. You don't have any (because none exists).
Now you are back to an appeal to authority fallacy; but worse because you are actually putting your own words in.
So, as the person attempting to be on topic I'll again ask: Where is your support that a 12kg center cannot work with a 40kg tower; and how do you reconcile that claim with the fact that you believe that Revel's speaker lineup, which often includes 2:1 weight ratios between LR and C, "works" despite violating your claim? I have no interest in anything here but the truth or falsehood of claims of fact, such as yours above.
