As bad as you and I think SW7 was
, as long as people pay money and the studios make billions of dollars, the studios will just continue making the same crap (to us).
I can't blame them. I'm not rich. So money matters. If I could make a masterpiece that wouldn't make me a lot money versus a piece of crap that would make me billions, I would make the piece of crap.
I get all the for profit philosophy. I even get your position on making something for money if you’re not rich. Thanks for the reply.
I get the feeling, however, that directors would like to have something like the original was, in their opus/portfolio. That was the whole point of my post. Blade Runner made decent money, old Aliens made decent money, original Star Wars were a cultural phenomenon, but they didn’t get to be that as a result of trying to “jump-start” something that was already done.
That’s why I said that the formula is not successful. It’s like in talent shows where kids try to become their idols by following steps their idols never followed. It is upside down. Even if you try to work with an already existing franchise, you’re still free to make your impact, to own it and make it yours. That’s why audience and professionals, critics as well as various cinema academy nerds all liked new Batman movies, but most of them disliked, more or less, SW 1, 2, & 3, Prometheus, Jean-Pierre Jeunet’s Alien: Resurrection and so on.