
mtrycrafts
Seriously, I have no life.
vividere said:The local area (Minnesota) guru of setting up home theaters was away at CES but came back and caught up on our local area HT forum. He responded to my question about meters with this:
"The $40 RS spl meter is a bargain. The digital one is harder to read, because the display bounces around a bit, so the analog meter is easier. You kind of average the pointer readings by eye. There have been rumors of it going away before, and they always keep it in the line. You can do a very credible job with this meter and Avia. Highly recommended. Note that this meter needs to be corrected for low frequency use. The corection tables have been posted on-line."
As you can see, he has a different perspective on reading the meter. I would like to get more information on correcting the meter. Wouldn't the tables only apply if you are reading the information into a computer or something where you would be creating charts?
I am just reading this.
The reason I like the analog for level matching over the Digital is the fact that the digital can be off a whole dB as it only reads in whole numbers.
The analog can be read much closer. Using pink noise keeps the needle pretty steady, not much to interpolate from moving needle and you can match the other channels to where the reference channel was.
Same applies when measuring frequency response with sine waves. The needle is steady.
The digital is great when checking overall sound levels. I have both. My boomboxes are demanding