Jostenmeat,
Point noted.
Unfortunately I have nowhere near the experience and or exposure to the types of speakers which you mention. My awareness and knowledge are second hand from having read various forums and numerous threads on "value" speakers which is what I am trying to identify. However, I find I am falling into the analysis paralysis trap.
That being said, given you level of expertise both first hand and technical experience, can you apply your knowledge and provide your feedback on any of the speakers which I mentioned in the first post what you believe to be a superior solution for a 5.1 Surround system at say sub $1500.
Although these forums are great, I am having difficulty discerning all the reviews and feedback on various speakers b/c the reviews/tests are done by different people versus just one or one group.
Just an observation: I have now been lurking here learning about different brands for several weeks. Great information for people like me who've been out of touch with music for the last 20 years. One common theme I have heard over and over regarding 'many' speakers (i.e. Ascends, Axiom, NHT, PSB's, X-LS and others) in the sub $400 range is the statement below or an iteration of it.
"These speakers are a great deal and cost hundreds less than many others of comparable sound and will even hold their own against other elite brands costing over $1000."
Does anyone else find this ironical given so many are in this space with great performance. Maybe the statement should go like this.
"These $1500 speakers, albeit beautiful to look at, perform similar to 'many' sub $400 speakers."
Just my two cents worth.
Sorry man, I only know the PSB's. Well, for 2 seconds I've heard some NHTs in passing while excitedly scurrying about from dedicated room to dedicated room at a place with Quads, B&Ws, Sonus Fabers, REL, velodyne, etc, with McCormack, Primare, and Rotel gear.
What have
you heard so far, and what do you think? What did you love about any speaker and what did you wish it did either better or differently. I just bought my first pair of nice speakers just 5 months ago. Yes, I picked the brains of double digit audio dealers, 25+ pairs of speakers listened across about double digit brands, with innumerable revisits to favorites, filling up a Mead mini notebook with scrawled notes while listening to a 6 cd array. I made sure I got what
I wanted,
and it wasn't easy!!! My budget simply exploded in the process too. Ridiculous.
Unlike many/most/innumerable posters here, I did not want to go the way of ID. There is nothing to argue, or at least nothing I feel compelled to argue about, its just the path I took. Easier for me since I live in SoCal, a pretty people packed cosmopolitan area with too many stores. Well, your selections seem to be half ID brands? It seems that the Audioholics reviewers just love the Axiom speakers. The few detractions I hear are about the forward/bright nature of the tweeters, and perhaps particularly the double tweeters on their nicer/nicest towers. I think the QS8 surrounds look really cool and would love to hear them one day. NHT, people might say the same thing about brightness, and some lovers think they are very accurate with voice. Lovers of PSB say the same thing regarding vocal traits.
You really must find for yourself what you want. For instance, I did an A/B test last week with PSBs and MA bronze series bookshelves. The PSBs cranked better, larger soundstage, much superior extension. However, they were brighter, more unforgiving, and most importantly
to me, they did not have as pleasant of a coloration. I do not know if this house-sound/coloration directly attributed to the one real thing I liked better about the Monitor Audios: I found they created fuller and/or variated
simultaneous timbres. For me, this gives the music more soul, enjoyability, and perhaps even comprehensibilty. BUT, they compressed very, very quickly compared to the PSBs. So, I would take PSB for HT surrounds easily, (which is what I have for precisely that purpose only) and I would take the MAs for low-level, near-field home office music easily. (I'm hunting for gifts). Stuff like that, catch my drift?
Assuming my first impressions were remotely based on some sort of reality, which would you pick?
It wouldn't hurt for you to list some commonly asked for information:
1. %s music vs HT?
2. Willing to upgrade over time? (ie starting 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 2.1, 3.1, 4.1, etc).
3. Volume of room? (very important. Sub is key in HT. Will decidedly change budget left for speakers, if answer to #1 is HT 90%, etc.)
I hope yet another point shall be taken

Post what you think after hearing. I just did today, and these speakers aren't even for me...
