Speaker Cables for "Bright" Systems?

[pikers]

It doesn't depend on this? Is there a reason why you're allowed to post ridiculous things like this, or are you a moderator?

Do you see a 'moderator' with my moniker?

What is ridiculous? Why? Please explain. Could it be that you are mistaken???

If you have a bright speaker and want better cabling for other reasons, you would select the correct MIT product. There are others that do this, but they're known for it.

Actually, if you have a bright speaker, as you say, you would do effective fixes for it, not speaker cables. It just cannot do what you are wishing it could do.
Maybe your room is too bright? Have you thought of EQing yoru room???

Your prodding is simply flame-bait, but then you've been know for that for years...

Years??? You just got here. And, if you know me from some other place, I guess the years didn't increase your knowledge base in audio science and reality. Not my fault.

I've been around. And, with ten plus years in the industry, the likelyhood that I'd learn something from you is 1. Not necessary and 2. not likely.

If someone isn't willing to throw up treatments, a simple swap is adequate. EQing is a superior plan, yes, but earlier I did make the stipulation stating "if you need to replace your wiring for other reasons..."

Anyway, there's more than one way to handle this. I would recommend acoustic treatments first, selecting neutral electronics and cabling, ensuring effective power conditioning to further remove grain, then EQing to the icing. I say this in this order, respecting the fact that most audiophiles would rather keep signal-altering electronics out of the chain unless absolutely necessary.

Realize, though; your inherent fingers-in-the-ears unwillingness to talk about what vaious cabling issues can do for your system shouldn't stifle others.

 

[mtrycrafts]

I've been around. And, with ten plus years in the industry,

Yes, famous words. But that gives you no immunity from being gullible, biased and just plain wrong.



the likelyhood that I'd learn something from you is 1. Not necessary and 2. not likely.

Actually you have demonstrated much in the few posts here, that you have much more to learn, lots more. But, as the saying goes about the horse and water, well, you know that saying.

If someone isn't willing to throw up treatments, a simple swap is adequate.


Wrong. Mistake one.


but earlier I did make the stipulation stating "if you need to replace your wiring for other reasons..."

What other reasons? Replace it with in kind but longer. Cost is not an indicator of anything of importance in performance.

I would recommend acoustic treatments first, selecting neutral electronics and cabling, ensuring effective power conditioning to further remove grain,


Ah, some of the voodoo stuff. Yep, 10 years will do that to you. Got the right lingo too.

then EQing to the icing.

Or, one of the early, real beneficial trweatments.

I say this in this order, respecting the fact that most audiophiles would rather keep signal-altering electronics out of the chain unless absolutely necessary.

Ah, that is because they have been brainwashed by the hi end priests of audio. Are you part of the problem???

Realize, though; your inherent fingers-in-the-ears unwillingness to talk about what vaious cabling issues can do for your system shouldn't stifle others.

Cables cannot solve anything, period. 10 years of voodoo will drive anyone to the dark side. Too late.