So, are you saying that I was incorrect, and that croseiv should have said that not only does it bitstream, it also internally unpacks? Thanks, I honestly don't know, and simply had read someone else post as such.
I'm pretty curious about this. In my honest opinion for today... I've felt that displays in general were way ahead of all the source material available... until Bluray showed up. I am now under the impression that
most displays are behind what BD can give. JMO. I am using a Pana BD-30, and it looks ridonkulous on my 159" screen. Talking out of my butt, it might have a bit more color saturation than my HD-A35 HD-DVD player, and my JVC projector is already known for some over-saturation...
So my nutshell opinion is that to take advantage of top end BD players, you might want a top end display, calibrated, with excellent light control. JMO.
but if the players are going to make big leaps, I just simply can't imagine how good that will look. Cuz it looks freaking amazing as it is.
JMO.
There is no difference in decoding capabilites. Its like unzipping or unpacking a file. No difference. Now, you could possibly speak of DAC performance, but if you bitstream, that's dependent on your receiver anyways.
Phil, as for Uniphier in the Panny's, yea they've not been very good for SD. However, perhaps as happened with the PS3, I've read a couple of recent consumer reviews that the recent FWs have made it quite good now. Even I am a little reluctant to immediately believe that, perhaps it warrants some investigation on your part.
Otherwise, I can't recommend Pana enough. They are extremely good about up to date FWs, and they own most of the patents associated with Bluray, AFAIK.