Balanced cables are superior to unbalanced, and I never bay equipment with phono plugs. Yes, I use fairely long cables. But balanced is only superior if done right: the transmitter must have the same output impedance on both lines, and the receiver must have a differential amplifier, also with closely matched input impedances (like an instrumentation amplifier). Otherwise one cannot obtain a high CMRR (Common Mode Rejection Ratio), which is required to suppress interference. A lot of equipment (consumer and semi-pro) with XLR connectors do not satisfy these requirements, so I always try to check before I buy something.
Apart for us (possibly) disagreeing about the merits of balanced cables, is there any other reason you will advise me to stay away from the AIBBC amp?
I have never heard of that brand, it just doesn't do it for me. I would personally prefer to stay with well known brands that have a proven history and after the sale support.
Yes, ON PAPER the balanced connections (and really as you mentioned, you really want balanced topography from input to output and not simply balanced connections) is indeed superior to unbalanced/single ended connections.
But, in the HOME environment there is rarely an AUDIBLE difference b/w the 2 connection types, with several caveats about interference, cable length, etc. But, as I mentioned, I'm the type of person that doesn't go looking for problems to solve. Unbalanced have met my expectations so I personally have no need to go to XLR just for the sake of going to balanced XLR.
Since you seem to be knowledgeable on the topic of balanced vs. unbalanced, it's your decision to make. I just wanted to be 100% certain that you weren't making this decision based on some marketing BS!
In the home environment, there are some advantages to XLR, even if not audible advantages. The XLR connections are nice due to the fact that they will typically give an audible "click" when the connection is seated properly, and the connection is more secure.