E
Exit
Audioholic Chief
There has been a lot of discussion on the excess compression and clipping of music in today’s recordings. In the late 1970’s and early 80’s a company called DBX made sound processors to process vinyl recordings. I had a dynamic range expander, a waveform peak restorer and a bass extension processor. DBX exited the market when CDs became popular because it was thought their processors would not be needed with the fidelity of CDs. I got rid of them when I switched to surround sound because there were no tape monitor circuits to hook them up.
I believe my Yamaha receiver has a dynamic range increase/decrease switch built in so it may be able to decompress a little. The feature is buried deep in the menu system and is not convenient to switch on and off. Why can’t receiver manufacturers incorporate these DBX processor functions into their receivers and remote controls for their receivers? This could allow audiophiles a means to restore recordings closer to their pre-processed state for better fidelity. There are new and old recordings on CDs and processing varies so the DBX features would need to be easily variable. Does anybody think this would be a good idea?
I believe my Yamaha receiver has a dynamic range increase/decrease switch built in so it may be able to decompress a little. The feature is buried deep in the menu system and is not convenient to switch on and off. Why can’t receiver manufacturers incorporate these DBX processor functions into their receivers and remote controls for their receivers? This could allow audiophiles a means to restore recordings closer to their pre-processed state for better fidelity. There are new and old recordings on CDs and processing varies so the DBX features would need to be easily variable. Does anybody think this would be a good idea?