Would a Proton 550 be an upgrade from my Yamaha RX-396 in my 2-channel room?
Squishman Audioholic Samurai Today at 8:42 AM #1 Would a Proton 550 be an upgrade from my Yamaha RX-396 in my 2-channel room?
TLS Guy Audioholic Jedi Today at 8:59 AM #2 Squishman said: Would a Proton 550 be an upgrade from my Yamaha RX-396 in my 2-channel room? View attachment 80148 Click to expand... I don't know fer certain, but I suspect it would be a really lateral move. There is nothing wrong with your Yamaha. My view is if gear is working well and doing the job: - leave it alone!
Squishman said: Would a Proton 550 be an upgrade from my Yamaha RX-396 in my 2-channel room? View attachment 80148 Click to expand... I don't know fer certain, but I suspect it would be a really lateral move. There is nothing wrong with your Yamaha. My view is if gear is working well and doing the job: - leave it alone!
Squishman Audioholic Samurai Today at 9:14 AM #3 It is a sweet looking unit. I'd lose the remote capability though. I'd prefer an integrated amp over a receiver.
It is a sweet looking unit. I'd lose the remote capability though. I'd prefer an integrated amp over a receiver.
TLS Guy Audioholic Jedi 43 minutes ago #4 Squishman said: It is a sweet looking unit. I'd lose the remote capability though. I'd prefer an integrated amp over a receiver. Click to expand... Why would a receiver be a downgrade? In terms of SQ there will be zero difference.
Squishman said: It is a sweet looking unit. I'd lose the remote capability though. I'd prefer an integrated amp over a receiver. Click to expand... Why would a receiver be a downgrade? In terms of SQ there will be zero difference.
Squishman Audioholic Samurai 34 minutes ago #5 TLS Guy said: Why would a receiver be a downgrade? In terms of SQ there will be zero difference. Click to expand... Not in terms of a downgrade. I like the sleek look of this Proton and vintage NAD integrated amps. I don't need a radio on it.
TLS Guy said: Why would a receiver be a downgrade? In terms of SQ there will be zero difference. Click to expand... Not in terms of a downgrade. I like the sleek look of this Proton and vintage NAD integrated amps. I don't need a radio on it.
TLS Guy Audioholic Jedi 24 minutes ago #6 Squishman said: Not in terms of a downgrade. I like the sleek look of this Proton and vintage NAD integrated amps. I don't need a radio on it. Click to expand... Whatever you do, stay away from NAD. NAD stands for Not Always Dependable. I can assure they rightfully earned that moniker.
Squishman said: Not in terms of a downgrade. I like the sleek look of this Proton and vintage NAD integrated amps. I don't need a radio on it. Click to expand... Whatever you do, stay away from NAD. NAD stands for Not Always Dependable. I can assure they rightfully earned that moniker.
Squishman Audioholic Samurai 20 minutes ago #7 TLS Guy said: Whatever you do, stay away from NAD. NAD stands for Not Always Dependable. I can assure they rightfully earned that moniker. Click to expand... Roger that!
TLS Guy said: Whatever you do, stay away from NAD. NAD stands for Not Always Dependable. I can assure they rightfully earned that moniker. Click to expand... Roger that!
