Prices continue to rise

little wing

little wing

Audioholic General
I like the cash back I get with my capital one credit card. It's up to almost $400 bucks right now! Plus, if some worm gets a hold of your information, it's easier to deal with a fraud situation, with a credit card, then it is with a debit card. It least I found that to be the case.

All I know is, it's not getting any easier for a lot of people to make a decent living. Let alone allocate big money for electronics. My property taxes, homeowners Insurance, health Insurance, utilities have all gone up. food is crazy expensive. Everything is up. So my forever speakers and amps are put on hold for now. And my job just told us, no raises for the third year in a row..

My brother has a beautiful apartment outside of Philly (in Hatboro PA) and his rent just went up to $1750 a month! He can afford it, but I would lose my mind if I was paying that much in rent. With interest rates over 6.5 %, getting into a house is not easy, if you don't have bunch of cash. Nobody in the white house really cares either. We're on our own, that's the way it's always been.
 
Trell

Trell

Audioholic Spartan
I like the cash back I get with my capital one credit card. It's up to almost $400 bucks right now! Plus, if some worm gets a hold of your information, it's easier to deal with a fraud situation, with a credit card, then it is with a debit card. It least I found that to be the case.
You get cash back because of the parasitic credit card companies with exorbitant fees. Before EU in 2015 capped the credit cards transactional fees to 0.3% for consumers I too enjoined the benefits, if you could pay in full each month, that is. Once the new 0.3% hit my credit card got much less benefits, but I still use the credit card for reasons due to Swedish consumer laws when buying stuff. A consumer credit card has a cap at 0.3%, I no longer feel guilty using a credit card to protect myself from fraudsters.
 
Last edited:
little wing

little wing

Audioholic General
You get cash back because of the parasitic credit card companies with exorbitant fees. Before EU in 2015 capped the credit cards transactional fees to 0.3% for consumers I too enjoined the benefits, if you could pay in full each month, that is. Once the new 0.3% hit my credit card got much less benefits, but I still use the credit card for reasons due to Swedish consumer laws when buying stuff. A consumer credit card has a cap at 0.3%, I no longer feel guilty using a credit card to protect myself from fraudsters.
That's true, yeah, I hate debt, so I've pretty successful at keeping my CC balances in check, although they are creeping up lately...
 
j_garcia

j_garcia

Audioholic Jedi
Food is definitely where I feel it is most obvious. Typical night out at the restaurant used to be about $50-60 and now it is routinely around $75-100. We got pizza, one salad and drinks and it was just over $100 on Friday.
 
ryanosaur

ryanosaur

Audioholic Overlord
Yes, local, as in around here. In SF it is an actual approved surcharge allowed for health care costs for workers. A Cali law banned "junk" surcharges on your bill with no explanation. SF then added an ordinance to allow a health care cost surcharge because they were unable to retain workers.

The change started with a number of businesses who gave a better price for cash vs. card because they avoid the fees of the credit card services. At some point, that flipped to companies just passing that cost to the consumer.

*edit. Recently, we've noticed some new international chains, usually food spots, don't accept cash at all.
I think CA junked the law banning such fees? I still have stuff showing up like health care and fare wage fees, pre tax being tacked on to my checks in wine country.
 
j_garcia

j_garcia

Audioholic Jedi
I think CA junked the law banning such fees? I still have stuff showing up like health care and fare wage fees, pre tax being tacked on to my checks in wine country.
Junk fees states that they have to disclose it all. It can't be lumped into a generic category and they can't conceal what it is for. Generally, the purpose is that they have to give you the total expected cost WITH fees before you commit to a purchase. So it is not that they can't have them, they just can't tell you "this is the price" and it ends up being more after the fact due to previously undisclosed fees.
 
Trell

Trell

Audioholic Spartan
Food is definitely where I feel it is most obvious. Typical night out at the restaurant used to be about $50-60 and now it is routinely around $75-100. We got pizza, one salad and drinks and it was just over $100 on Friday.
Well, it's unlikely to be caused by the Trump tariffs unless the restaurants import from Europe, that is. Another possible cause is the ICE thugs scaring away the immigrants that compromise over 60% of the agricultural work force.
 
Trell

Trell

Audioholic Spartan
I’m not allowed in.
:(

The state gave restaurants a brief reprieve from the law.
This is the first of three parts of the article you linked to.

>>>California lawmakers have given restaurants a last-minute exemption from a statewide law that takes effect July 1 and bans hidden or “junk” fees on goods and services, including hotel rooms, car rentals and event tickets.

That law, Senate Bill 478, would have prohibited restaurants, bars and other food vendors from adding service fees and other surcharges to bills, but on Thursday, the state Senate unanimously approved an emergency measure that would allow restaurants to continue charging the fees. If signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom, Senate Bill 1524 would take effect immediately.

While supporters of the junk fees bill maintain it will help protect consumers from unexpected expenses, many in the restaurant industry have taken exception with the new law, which they say shouldn’t apply to them.

Restaurateurs argue that service fees and surcharges, usually 3-6% of the final bill but sometimes as much as 20%, are necessary to supplement wages for workers, such as cooks, dishwashers and other staff who don’t receive tips and other gratuities.

“Today we take an important step toward providing consumers with upfront price transparency without inadvertently harming food service workers or small businesses,” said Sen. Bill Dodd, D-Napa, who proposed the SB 1524 carveout for restaurants.

The new bill would require that any fees, including mandatory gratuity, are “displayed conspicuously on restaurant menus,” according to a news release from Sen. Dodd’s office.

In Sonoma County, many restaurant owners and workers have anxiously been awaiting July 1.

On Thursday, some restaurateurs breathed a sigh of relief, saying that restaurant fees are critical to their businesses at a time when prices of raw ingredients continue to soar, staffing remains a challenge, and margins are thinner than ever.

Meanwhile, a few have already opted to forgo surcharges altogether, as well as tipping, with menu prices that include everything except sales tax.
...
<<<
 
ryanosaur

ryanosaur

Audioholic Overlord
Continuing as a side note, many restaurants put these fees before tax is charged, and also expect you to tip on top of the fee. Most of the time this is still an insignificant amount, only changing the tip amount by 1% or so.
On the other hand, as many places are doing the “let us help you tip us” approach of recommending percentages or dollar amounts that you simply check off on the check…

*shrugs

More to the topic at hand is that our inflation is up. And nobody was giving any ground on already increased prices around here. :rolleyes:
 
Mikado463

Mikado463

Audioholic Spartan
'Mandatory Gratuity' .......WTF !!! I understand the policy on large parties but when it's a couple or two, give me a break. But then again, it is Kalifornia.........;)
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
So my next question is, is anyone doing anything differently because of these prices increases in electronics?

Like buying "backup" equipment for the future since we know prices will increase?

Has technology like 4K video and ATMOS sound reached a plateau/peak (like DAC)?
 
Trell

Trell

Audioholic Spartan
So my next question is, is anyone doing anything differently because of these prices increases in electronics?

Like buying "backup" equipment for the future since we know prices will increase?

Has technology like 4K video and ATMOS sound reached a plateau/peak (like DAC)?
I don't live in USA, but we could easily get hit by secondary effects, so I built two new PC's earlier than I had planned.
 
little wing

little wing

Audioholic General
Having backup gear makes sense. Word of caution on buying backup equipment though. When you recieve it, you might want to take the time to disconnect your currently working equipment and install the "backup" gear, and put it thourgh it's paces, to make sure it's not defective in anyway. Because if you don't need it, until say 6 months or a year from now, and go to hook it up and find out something's wrong, you can't return it.
 
TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Audioholic Jedi
So my next question is, is anyone doing anything differently because of these prices increases in electronics?

Like buying "backup" equipment for the future since we know prices will increase?

Has technology like 4K video and ATMOS sound reached a plateau/peak (like DAC)?
Not really. The items most likely to need replacement are the TVs. However they are large and a storage headache, so we would just have to suck that up.

I do have older AVRs in the great room and family room. I suppose one day I will hear from Marantz on the warranty repair in the 7706. If it comes back, that will be a spare and I have Marantz 8003 stored away, that could be put into service. For my Quad amps, I do have an 909 boxed and ready to go if needed. I have lots of spare 405 II and plenty of spares including boards.

I have two universal disc players in the rack. I have spares to the Shure SR 106 units and I could service the Crown crossover.

So, I think I am in good shape, but you never know. I do hope the AV 10 has 'long legs' I would hate to have to replace that.

I still find it a disgrace that the 7705 and 7706 units failed and in a very similar way. I am 99% certain the issue is in the power supply, only that really explains the way they failed.
I think part of the issue is making a price point. So, I have a feeling that these complex multi-channel AVRs and AVPs are having too many corners cut.

I think an awful lot of potential buyers are now getting priced out of the market, and that is before we even get to the point of installing it in a satisfactory way in homes. Both these issues are significant negative marketing factors.

That is why we need affordable two and three channel units with bass management to be available. They should be priced and designed to really deliver, be neat and tidy and have very low failure rates. In my view that is the only way to get back to good audio in homes, now with the added benefit of AV.
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
Like Epson, it looks like JVC also increased prices on their PJ.
 
D

dlaloum

Senior Audioholic
Last week I placed an order for a client in OK. It was for a B&W system.

Today I just realized B&W (Sound United) just increased the prices of the 702s3 by $200/pair and HTM71s3 by $300.

We already know SU raised prices on the Marantz and Denon models a few weeks ago.

So prices continue to rise.
Across the board (all countries / regions) - or just the USA?
 
mtrycrafts

mtrycrafts

Seriously, I have no life.
And the near future looks bleak. Long future, who knows, civil war? :mad:
My son and 3 grandsons may be in trouble. :eek:
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top