I have a problem with the political compass. It defines fascism as authoritarian and communism as collectivism, when communism is equally as authoritarian as fascism. In fact, the two are more similar than dissimilar, with ownership of the means of production as the only significant difference.
Further, it defines neo-liberalism and libertarianism as the same thing on the right, when the economic right is generally considered as Classical Liberalism, while neo-liberalism is a disguised form of socialism. But wait, it gets sillier, in that while it describes libertarianism as neo-liberalism, it also puts libertarian separately on another axis as Anarchism, when libertarian and anarchism couldn't be more different. Anyway, it should at least explain why it places Libertarians as neo-liberal and anarchist, which of course they are neither.