Some of you may remember my previous thread discussing the various options in the Paradigm Studio line 40’s, 60’s, or 100’s. And you may remember that, after a listening test, I fell in love with the 100’s. In fact I had all but bought the Studio 100’s.
Alas, life has conspired against me (mostly in the form of Money and Space). So I am backing off my grand visions and looking a little smaller. Bookshelf’s to be exact. There are a lot of good words out there on the Studio 40’s and I have read some articles on the Studio 20’s, but I have never seen any comparisons. Also of note, in my listening test I preferred the 40’s to all of the Paradigm Monitor line.
My plan would be to buy the Studio 20’s or 40’s with a good sub (currently thinking the Outlaw LFM-1) matched up with the Outlaw 1070 (when it finally comes out). Over time I would add the Paradigm Studio centers, and rears, and finally add a couple of block amps and get the 100’s. The 20’s / 40’s would then be moved to another room or used in a 7.1 setup.
I am looking for your thoughts on this. I would really rather go with the 20’s because of their size and ability to re-task later. But I have a big room to fill, open loft with a 15 x 15 listening / viewing area in a 25 x 35 room with 11 foot ceilings. I am assuming that the Outlaw 1070 at 65w per channel all driven will be enough power (the word is Outlaw rates their power very conservatively).
As I am new at this I am also a little concerned that the 40’s with a sub will produce a better overall sound than the 20’s with a sub (just because the 40’s have 2 mid drivers and the 20’s only one). Is this silly newbie thinking?
Thanks in advance for you help.
Jeff