Hi guys. I am new here as well. I've built an urge to get my home cinema out recently and came to a conclusion to buy the Panasonic AX100. I love the feature especially 2x zoom. My house is a bit small and I am too greedy and want to get a 120" screen. Ha! Ha!.
My other choices were Optoma H72, Panny AE900, Optoma H70 and may be Sanyo Z5. Unfortunately, only Panny comes with 2x zoom. Went to test Optoma but the local distributor is total useless. Don't think want to risk my money on some distributor that I can't trust.
Anyway, back to Panny AX100. Saw all the great reviews in Projector Central and Projector Reviews. Even here. Unfortunately, recently in Projector Central 2 fella posted below comments.
So, would really love to hear from those of you who have tested the machine... is it so bad as what they commented or they are simply "bad" guys?
By the way, I am from Malaysia and Panny AX100 will only be launched end of the month.
Anthony said:
Personal Experience
Bought my projector 7 days ago.
Initial impression was, wow nice and bright.
But this opinion soon dulled when I noticed moving text was distorted and jerky. Straight lines on a boring old composite input appeared jaggered. Tried to use component video inputs and found that bright red objects were flickering and shaking. Tried 480p and 720p input, both the same result.
Colours are not natural, Greens and Oranges are far too overpowering.
Some scenes, with dynamic Iris on, flicker between changes from bright to dark or vice versa.
The projector itself is bulky.
Unsure why others have raved about its quality upscalling, as it appears that it can't handle it.
Overall unhappy with its picture quality. It's obviously been designed to only work well with native 720p movies.
I'm taking mine back to the store tomorrow.
Problems
Not versatile enough when handling different input resolutions/sources.
Colours aren't natural, overpowering.
Graphics/Text distorts when the projector rescales it. Even worse if you try keystone correction.
Inanimate Red objects appear to flicker and wobble against their backgrounds when using component video.
sdenijs said:
Personal Experience
A few days ago I received the ax100 and was really impressed with the amount of light it produced. Also the sharpness of the image looked very good. But after some more testing in a dark room I came across some problems. I used the test patterns of DVE PAL (Digital Video sentials) which showed quite some false contours even with the sharpness control at its lowest setting. A complete gray image did not look very homogene, although I did not notice this during movie viewing. One demo of DVE shows a man and a woman in a restaurant and the light jacket of the woman shows some very uggly jaggies
(staircases) on the shoulders. I compared this with my old AE700 which, for this scene, looks much better. With my HDTV decoder at 1080i the image looks terrible especially for subtitles, so I find it very strange that some reviewers say the ax100 has a good deinterlacer. My old AE700 does a much better job. The dynamic iris makes a very strange noise and is actively working even with a still image.
The remote control is very good, the menu structure is great and also the lens shift is much easier to operate.
Problems
Jaggies, bad de-interlacing & noisy iris made me decide to return it and keep my old ae700.