Look, people, all I was really trying to say about this was that
I feel -- just personally -- when a room is being specifically preapred for and in anticipation for a
two-channel, music-only setup with absolutely no intentions for home theater, to me it makes more sense to always use gear specifically made for stereo applications rather than a surround, multichannel AVR, regardless of arguing over price or "cheap/budget" monikers attached to some of this gear. I'll always direct people towards stereo pieces -- whether they be receivers, integrated amps with separate tuners or full blown separates -- when they ask about putting together a strictly
music-only system.
I think Onkyo, getting back to the point of this thread and their new stereo receiver, realizes there is still some "magic" to be squeezed from this sliver of the market and also recognizes that there is still something to offer the person interested in a home music system who wants everything in one chassis, albeit with arguably "reduced" performance when compared to their higher end hi fi stuff (separates) they just released too. It is indeed refreshing to see companies like Onkyo and Yamaha and even Outlaw keeping the stereo receiver alive in this day and age -- sure, they don't have the cache and draw of the models of yesteryear with their blazing blue scopes for the tuning dials and VU meters to indicate signal strength and such, but it sure is nice to know they still exist, and that some models are getting "retro" touches with solid aluminum faceplates and classic turning knobs that are pleasing to the touch a la Yamaha and Onkyo.

Further, it's even nicer to know that models from the likes of these three companies are undoubtedly made with a much more serious approach to audio and with better quality components than, say, the "stereo receivers" you see lined up in the home theater section of Best Buy or Radio Shack...you know, the $89 Sonys or Sherwoods with the knobs missing and wires hanging off them and such...
To me,
that is the "extreme budget" or "cheap" approach to the stereo receiver subdivision --
not models from the companies I mentioned or perhaps Marantz or (at one time) NAD or Rotel.