On Trump

[Mr._Clark]

While MSNBC posted the wrong photo of Pretti, they admitted their mistake. Contrast that with the Whitehouse - the 'effin' Whitehouse! - posting fake a photo of Nekima Levy Armstrong and refusing to take it down.

FACT FOCUS: White House shares altered image showing arrest of civil rights attorney in Minnesota

The Trump administration is misrepresenting the arrest of civil rights attorney Nekima Levy Armstrong for her role in an anti-immigration enforcement protest that disrupted a service at a Minnesota church.

apnews.com

Trump's use of AI images further erodes public trust, experts say

An edited — and realistic — image of a civil rights attorney in tears after being arrested is raising new alarms about how the government is blurring the line between what is real and what is fake.

www.pbs.org

And, of course, regardless of what Pretti actually looked like, he was killed by the United States government.

As Clint Eastwood would say "It's a hell of a thing, killing a man. Take away all he's got and all he's ever gonna have,"

Including taking away his Life, Liberty, and pursuit of Happiness, and all inalienable rights that he was endowed with by his Creator.

 

[mtrycrafts]

What a loser. Guess it confirmed everything that happened before....

-- would not directly condemn the KKK and David Duke to Jake Tapper
-- "there were good people on both sides" of Charlottesville
-- Proud Boys-- stand back, and stand by
-- illegal immigrants are "poisoning the blood of our country"
-- always had some weird bitter jealousy towards Obama

Can you expand on this list, please.

 

[Mikado463]

As each day passes Trump continues to prove, he is in fact lower than Whale dung ............

 

[lovinthehd]

Who's better, Miller or Vance?

JD Vance is doing nothing more than playing down the little confrontation Trump and Collins had. Vance has proven to be a better A$$ kisser than his predecessor by far........

 

[Dude#1279435]

Can you expand on this list, please.

Paul Ryan's kind of like textbook racism when referring to Trump's comments on a Mexican judge who I assume didn't side with him. I think that was Trump University or one of his other scams but can't remember.

There was that one I'd have to look up where Trump said something along the lines of residents "eating pets" referring to immigrants.

The writer who said Trump was playing "footsie" with the alt-right.

Obviously the "Mexicans are rapists." I'm sure there's a few rapists coming across the border but c'mon man Trump made it sound like rape was wide spread. I felt the key to the whole thing was his concluding oh and I suppose some of them are good people. Saying to me a few are good but most are not. Illegal or not it's pretty ridiculous to think most are criminals.

 

[Dude#1279435]

Third headline cracks me up.

OLYMPIANS' 'MIXED EMOTIONS' REPRESENTING USA
Vance Booed at Olympics...
Skier urinates 'F--- ICE' in snow...
Switzerland wins first gold...

 

[Dude#1279435]

Who's better, Miller or Vance?

Vance, but in terms of "vibe" I'd rather have Rubio in '28. Miller's pretty awful.

Edit: it's difficult to say because Vance is in the foreground while Miller is in the background.

 

[Mikado463]

Who's better, Miller or Vance?

LMAO, using the word 'better' in regards to referencing either one of them ??

Miller is nothing more than a little piss-ant, bald headed turd, ok then, I guess I answered your question......

 

[Mr._Clark]

Vance, but in terms of "vibe" I'd rather have Rubio in '28. Miller's pretty awful.

Edit: it's difficult to say because Vance is in the foreground while Miller is in the background.

Vance annoys me because he is actually quite intelligent and he knows better. I read his autobiography (Hillbilly Elogy) when it first came out and I thought he had real potential. But, as far as I can tell, he decided to sell his soul in pursuit of Washington power once he realized Trump's sales pitch worked. Ironically, of course, the populist shtick is really just another way to gain power and money.

I'm not sure what to think of Miller. He seems to have a rather modest IQ and an innate inability to think beyond his rather narrow worldview. It's like he sees everything through sh*t colored glasses.

If I was forced to pick between two sh*t sandwiches, I'd say Vance at least has the potential to come around some day, whereas Miller will just keep swimming in his own sh*t forever.

And that's my huge opinion. Everyone is obviously free to disagree, I will not pretend to have any special insight or knowledge of either one.

 

[mtrycrafts]

Vance annoys me because he is actually quite intelligent and he knows better. I read his autobiography (Hillbilly Elogy) when it first came out and I thought he had real potential. But, as far as I can tell, he decided to sell his soul in pursuit of Washington power once he realized Trump's sales pitch worked. Ironically, of course, the populist shtick is really just another way to gain power and money.

I'm not sure what to think of Miller. He seems to have a rather modest IQ and an innate inability to think beyond his rather narrow worldview. It's like he sees everything through sh*t colored glasses.

If I was forced to pick between two sh*t sandwiches, I'd say Vance at least has the potential to come around some day, whereas Miller will just keep swimming in his own sh*t forever.

And that's my huge opinion. Everyone is obviously free to disagree, I will not pretend to have any special insight or knowledge of either one.

A huge opinion would have filled a few pages.

 

[Dude#1279435]

Vance annoys me because he is actually quite intelligent and he knows better. I read his autobiography (Hillbilly Elogy) when it first came out and I thought he had real potential. But, as far as I can tell, he decided to sell his soul in pursuit of Washington power once he realized Trump's sales pitch worked. Ironically, of course, the populist shtick is really just another way to gain power and money.

I'm not sure what to think of Miller. He seems to have a rather modest IQ and an innate inability to think beyond his rather narrow worldview. It's like he sees everything through sh*t colored glasses.

If I was forced to pick between two sh*t sandwiches, I'd say Vance at least has the potential to come around some day, whereas Miller will just keep swimming in his own sh*t forever.

And that's my huge opinion. Everyone is obviously free to disagree, I will not pretend to have any special insight or knowledge of either one.

With Miller I find there to be a white national vibe.

 

[GO-NAD!]

Vance annoys me because he is actually quite intelligent and he knows better. I read his autobiography (Hillbilly Elogy) when it first came out and I thought he had real potential. But, as far as I can tell, he decided to sell his soul in pursuit of Washington power once he realized Trump's sales pitch worked. Ironically, of course, the populist shtick is really just another way to gain power and money.

I'm not sure what to think of Miller. He seems to have a rather modest IQ and an innate inability to think beyond his rather narrow worldview. It's like he sees everything through sh*t colored glasses.

If I was forced to pick between two sh*t sandwiches, I'd say Vance at least has the potential to come around some day, whereas Miller will just keep swimming in his own sh*t forever.

And that's my huge opinion. Everyone is obviously free to disagree, I will not pretend to have any special insight or knowledge of either one.

While the epithet "fascist" is regularly lobbed at the Trump administration, the accuracy of that descriptor could be fairly debated. However, if you had to pick one member of Trump's inner circle who personified that odious mindset, well...that would have to be Miller.

As for Vance, while he may have a brain, he has debased himself so thoroughly since becoming VP, that he will have a steep hill to climb in order to redeem himself. The problem is, if he wants to regain any degree of credibility, he needs to start working on that now. Doing that while carrying Trump's water for three more years looks like an impossible task. But, stranger things have happened...

 

[highfigh]

Paul Ryan's kind of like textbook racism when referring to Trump's comments on a Mexican judge who I assume didn't side with him. I think that was Trump University or one of his other scams but can't remember.

There was that one I'd have to look up where Trump said something along the lines of residents "eating pets" referring to immigrants.

The writer who said Trump was playing "footsie" with the alt-right.

Obviously the "Mexicans are rapists." I'm sure there's a few rapists coming across the border but c'mon man Trump made it sound like rape was wide spread. I felt the key to the whole thing was his concluding oh and I suppose some of them are good people. Saying to me a few are good but most are not. Illegal or not it's pretty ridiculous to think most are criminals.

You need to check a Sex Offender website if you think rape isn't common and don't bitch at me for posting this.

 

[highfigh]

Of course. I wasn't trying to suggest otherwise.

Again, not suggesting that.

I guess my point is that so many guns rights advocates yammer on about 2A protecting their right to bear arms in order to overthrow the government, should it turn tyrannical when , as far as I can tell, it does no such thing.

I really don't think we have any disagreement, just a misunderstanding of what we have both stated.

OK, so what is your definition of 'free state'? That's surely not possible if the government turns tyrannical. I believe it's less about overthrowing and more about defense against.

The problem with freedom- it requires responsible people to not go off the rails with "It's a free country" and the idea that people can do anything they want.