D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Warlord
It was a federal trial. I wondered about that as well.

The DOJ deserves some credit for asking for a very harsh sentence after his second conviction. This may have been intended to send a message to other criminals who have received pardons from Trump and/or to reduce the political fallout compared to letting him off easy after the second conviction.

I find myself wondering if Trump is soft on white collar crime because he (perhaps subconsciously) self-identifies with wealthy white collar criminals, whereas he views "street level" (for lack of a better term) criminals as being low class and unworthy of pardons.

If nothing else, the shift in resources to immigration enforcement has led to a decline in other areas:

>>>Bloomberg Law reports that the Justice Department and federal law enforcement agencies, under President Donald Trump, are reallocating resources from traditional priorities like terrorism and white-collar crime to focus more on immigration enforcement.<<<

Not a big fan of sending a message type sentences. The time should fit the crime. I remember one where the convicted sentence was so absurd I was cheering for them. Frankly I think it's unlawful.
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top