D
There was some mention of 2 subs on a couple of postings I saw - but they may not be independent channels, and there is no talk of Dirac DLBC for it.The MA9100 looks like a beast with 9 channels of class D amplification. States 140 watts at eight ohms and 240 W at four ohms, I wonder if that’s across all 9 channels? It also looks like it only has a single subwoofer output, but does come preloaded with Dirac. Really light on details so I guess everyone’s going to have to wait-and-see. If it truly does have only a single subwoofer output that’s a huge fail in today’s world, but I think a nine channel amplifier is enough for most people.
Apparently only one set of speakers can be configured for height on the 9100... so it can do 7.1.2 but not 5.1.4... sadly.
On page 24, if I'm reading it right, the Rear Surround can be assigned to either Top Front or Top Mid. And the Height can be assigned to Top Front, Top Mid or Top Rear.Apparently only one set of speakers can be configured for height on the 9100... so it can do 7.1.2 but not 5.1.4... sadly.
And then levels and distances are not set either when using EZ to EQ, as I understand from a quick scan of the manual. Lame, if so."EZ Set EQ" needs to be run from an app via Bluetooth....that's just primitive.
Guess they think if Dirac can do it, why not us.
That's how I read it too. Similar to the new Sony ES models.And then levels and distances are not set either when using EZ to EQ, as I understand from a quick scan of the manual. Lame, if so.
It's definitely a 2CH rating as it states in their specs. It claims 900 watts max power consumption so if it was truly 140x9 ACD, it would have to consume > 1400 watts (assuming 90% efficiency). It's probably closer to 80-90wpc x 9 ACD which is still pretty good.The MA9100 looks like a beast with 9 channels of class D amplification. States 140 watts at eight ohms and 240 W at four ohms, I wonder if that’s across all 9 channels? It also looks like it only has a single subwoofer output, but does come preloaded with Dirac. Really light on details so I guess everyone’s going to have to wait-and-see. If it truly does have only a single subwoofer output that’s a huge fail in today’s world, but I think a nine channel amplifier is enough for most people.
Isn't that what they do in the marketplace? Buy, rob retirement accounts, mount debt and run away?.... private equity buyout and subsequently trashed to junk status.
...
This AVR has Class D amps, not Class G.Class G amps must be extremely small and light.
9CH of amps, but it’s only about 16 lbs and only 5” height. And the internal pic looks pretty empty/hollow.
I worded that poorly, since there’s never a chance of running all 9 channels at max output in real life, can any two of the 9 channels run rated power? Are they 9 identical amplifiers? I definitely think this will need to be tested when it hits the shelves. Still disappointed with the subwoofer output though.It's definitely a 2CH rating as it states in their specs. It claims 900 watts max power consumption so if it was truly 140x9 ACD, it would have to consume > 1400 watts (assuming 90% efficiency). It's probably closer to 80-90wpc x 9 ACD which is still pretty good.
Oh, right. I was looking at their $8K SDR-35 AVR, which is class-G, and I assumed their 9100-AVR was also class-G. So their class D and G must be very small and light.This AVR has Class D amps, not Class G.