When i said BIG, i meant size wise. You are a hundred per cent correct. Some people like chocolate, some vanilla. It defenitely has to do with what people like. Not everybody drives the same car, right? I am not saying nad it the best receiver in the universe, but from all the equipment that i have experience with, been able to plug in at home with the same speakers, with the same cd/dvd player and from the stuff i have heard at my father's house, nad has an awesome dynamic, warm natural sound.
Like i said on the previous post, i had yamaha before, denon and played with a pioneer elite for a couple of weeks and yes, they are diferent, i am sorry, but they do not sound the same, period,
let me tell you something, when i got rid of my yamaha, and got the nad, i could tell the big difference when watching movies, with yamaha, i was used to that loud forward punchi sound during explosions and stuff like that, and i was kind of missing that, with nad i just had to get used to that difference, for movies nad does not have that loud forward sound, but it is defenitely more crystal clear and warmer. Im not saying nad is not loud either, i put that thing at 18, 17 db volume and my damm house is shaking, like i said, is just different. I am sure if i put an amplifier on this 70 watt nad the sound will also not be the same though. When i changed my stock radio on my land rover discovery and put an eclipse cd player, the damm difference is like night and day, if i put a alpine, it will sound different as well.
For example, the expensive nice looking receivers you find at best buy in the magnolia home theater room, they all sound different, and the nad also sound different. They are not bad, they just have a different sound. some sound similar, Some sound dull, some sound loud, too forward, some have a nice warm sound.
When i hooked up my NAD at home, even my wife told me, "oh yes, i can hear the difference", and she is the one that usually tells me why i am wasting money buying all that crap when everything is all the same.