MidnightSensi

MidnightSensi

Audioholic Samurai
That is exactly right, my parents would probably choose Bose before any speaker out of ignorance and would have no idea what those FR numbers mean. The only influence that might exist from publishing such numbers is in the morons in "some" of the big box shops that might wake up to it...
I'm so happy someone is on the same page as me with this!

If they are making good margins on it, and selling it, then I don't think the stores care if they sound good or not.

I understand our gripes with Monster Cable, but Bose I don't really mind. Bose has a great business model. They sell cheap chinese cube speakers for big margins, they have a host of car companies they work with....

They have been innovative, maybe not in the sense of top technology, but with making things like noise cancelling headphones and single-box systems.

They didn't invent those things, but they marketed them...and when it comes to your pocket that's what counts.

Their speakers do suck, but, they were smart enough to realize that most people will give up quality if they can hide a bass unit and just have baby speakers for the tops. Especially if its easier to use (most people don't know or give a f*ck what an 'input' is, or what surround mode they are in, etc.). By giving up frequency response they made things smaller, cheaper, and easier to package.

If they thought they could make as much money selling high end gear, then they probably would. But, they haven't.. because if you think about it, the only person that would hurt is themselves. If Bose made something similar to what we like, they'd be selling against themselves and their baby-module-whatever system.

Bose isn't marketing to us. If anyone has a problem with selling cheap **** for a lot of money, don't expect to buy that dream home theater this lifetime. :)


Coca-cola is just water with some (probably sick tasting if I wasn't used to it) syrup. The cups cost the movie theaters more than the fluid inside of them. That's why they are so massive, because the cost of the cup is how its made more than the size of it. And what they fill it with, the soda, costs dirt.

JP Champaign is probably filled with a bloody firehose.

Why is Bose so interesting?!

I want to think of the next Bose so I can sit back and watch movies all day instead of going to work from 7-5 and then going to my second job from 12am to 3am thurs-sun.
 
B

bborzell

Audioholic Intern
I had a set of Bose 901s in the 70s. Notwithstanding the fact that most of those years were spent in various states of consciousness that I don't delve into much anymore, I really liked them.

I used them for the music of the period as well as some classical and, after I finally got them placed appropriately, they did pretty much everything the ads said they would do.

Having said that, I think that, with the possible exception of the relatively new PA system they put out, the rest of the speaker systems that are currently produced by Bose are designed to appeal to a specific market segment who typically doesn't look for much other than the notion of getting decent sound out of apparently simple devices.

My mother-in-law loves her Wave radio. And it comes in the same color as her hearing aids.

Now that I think about it, I had a Mercedes SUV that came with a Bose system. Talk about thin, but then the car represented the worst expenditure of hard earned dollars I have ever made. I guess the sound system was made to order, in that regard.
 
Djizasse

Djizasse

Senior Audioholic
I'm not avg Joe

It cracks me up how its "cool" around here to bash Bose. Nobody is making you listen to it and the fact of the matter is, whether its great or not, lots of people ENJOY it. The avg Joe couldn't give two $hit$ about FR, but wants something better than his TV.
Sometimes I think people forget what this forum is about.
Perhaps some of you might take a look at the top left corner of this page and read the small red line.

I would like to thank all "above average Joes" for dispelling some myths that average Joes believes. "Bose is the best" being one of them.
 
Last edited:
Seth=L

Seth=L

Audioholic Overlord
I would send another email inquiring if their accoustimass modules can produce tactile responce at subsonic frequencies, and also ask if their speakers will reach 20,000hz (which is the peak of human hearing). Since higher frequencies aren't so affected by the accoustics of the room (in respect to the frequency being produced) and there are definitely recordings that go that high that you would like to know the extension of the Bose cube and accoustimasss' limitations.:D
 
WmAx

WmAx

Audioholic Samurai
Does Bose have a speaker at any cost in the USA that can match the $150/pair Behringer B2030P in either build quality or measured response and cross-referenced sound quality?

Come on Bose, bring it on! :)

-Chris
 
Alex2507

Alex2507

Audioholic Slumlord
Seriously guys, its a tired subject.
I'm not tired of it. I'm not interested in the live and let live attitude when it comes to bullshit. Bose and Monster suck and Denon manuals probably make sense to the Tujmekistanian barber that wrote them.

That is the truth.
 
MidnightSensi

MidnightSensi

Audioholic Samurai
Does Bose have a speaker at any cost in the USA that can match the $150/pair Behringer B2030P in either build quality or measured response and cross-referenced sound quality?

Come on Bose, bring it on! :)

-Chris
Um, if we are going to talk about a company being sketchy, Behringer is the king. The Truth series monitors are just cheap knockoffs of Genelecs classic monitors. Their amps are QSC RMX knockoffs. Their crossovers are dbX knockoffs. The board ripoffs are hard to proove, even if the layouts are exactly the same and its obvious... but when they make even the enclosures look the same, that's just sketchy. Mixers they stole from Mackie (and got sued for, settled out of court). Along with their mixers being the noisest damn things I've ever used. Pedals they ganked at least the dressing from Boss...

Back in college I worked in a bar with EP series amps, half of those fried before eventually swapping them out. By the time I started DJing down here, all my amps were Crown, Crest or QSC ... but no club here uses Behringer amps.

A few times I have gone where they have taken out their normal mixer and put in a Behringer because a fader was getting swapped or something and they just needed a cheap one to last the weekend. Noisey as hell, but the worst thing was the slides were so clunky. I got there a half hour early and the guy before me warned me "this mixer is a piece". Worst crossfader I've ever felt. The club got so many complaints from the resident DJs that the next day they had a Pioneer there rented until the A&H got back.


Behringer Truth:


Genelec:


Swizz Army Cable Tester:


Behringer Cable Tester:


(Hint: Guess which cable tester isn't a piece of junk?)

Boss pedals:


Behringer pedals:


I can go on, but I gotta go. :)



And so on...
 
WmAx

WmAx

Audioholic Samurai
I can go on, but I gotta go. :)



And so on...
OH, you can go on... but you don't make many good points. There are only a very few items that they actually 'copied' in the past, one being a mixer board. The EP amps are not even actual copies, they just use a very similar circuit design(which is not exactly anything innovative- class H has been around a long time), and in fact, one could argue in this case they improve upon the performance of the original in this case by compacting the signal paths as to be less prone to noise pickup. The Ep2500 measures superbly - besting the beloved Crown K2 in every way, even though the K2 has nearly identical factory ratings to the Ep2500. They have some superb crossovers (and what is the DCX2496 copying?) for studio monitor and high fi speaker systems use, and the parts used are even top notch. The EP amps work great for most people. The Ep2500 is built to a very high standard and even used military spec redundant boards. Many of the newer mixers are great - in both parts quality and performance (and are very low noise). I don't have any clue which model(s) you used, but I am referring to their newer and small units, like the Xenyz line. No crap parts are used either, and the sliders on this line are high quality Alps units, as well as most of the rotary pots. The Truth B2030P monitor uses very high quality parts and build(from the drivers, to the crossover, to the cabinet itself), and measures excellent. Better than anything 2-3x the price by anyone, that I have ever observed. Their B-5 mic is an incredible value. Extremely linear, withstands high SPL with no problem and have very low noise and has high build quality. I have measured/analyzed it and compared it to many units. It might very well be the best value mic on the market, if one wants a neutral medium size diaphragm omni mic. They used to have an excellent measuring mic too, the ECM8000. It used to come stock, +/- 1.5dB or so on average out of the box, had very good SPL range and decent build quality. But in the last year or two they have significantly reduced it's linearity because Panasonic stopped making the super linear capsule they were previously using in the unit. Now, this is unusual, in that it's a product I used to recommend, but no longer do because of this negative revision to the product.

Sure, they have crap products too. I have never stated otherwise, in fact, I have pointed that out many times in the past. I would not touch their instrument effect pedals or instruments with a ten foot pole. Same goes for many of their other products. You just have to pick your products carefully.

-Chris
 
Last edited:
MidnightSensi

MidnightSensi

Audioholic Samurai
OH, you can go on... but you don't make many good points. There are only a very few items that they actually 'copied' in the past, one being a mixer board.
So the Boss stomp pad look alike is just a coincidence? They had never seen the Boss stomp pads that have been around forever. You can barely tell them apart.

And they had never seen that Genelec monitor before? The Genelec monitor that was probably the most popular 2-way active nearfield?

They didn't get inspired by these things, they made them look EXACTLY THE SAME.


The EP amps are not even actual copies, they just use a very similar circuit design(which is not exactly anything innovative- class H has been around a long time), and in fact, one could argue in this case they improve upon the performance of the original in this case by compacting the signal paths as to be less prone to noise pickup. The Ep2500 measures superbly - besting the beloved Crown K2 in every way, even though the K2 has nearly identical factory ratings to the Ep2500.
No class H isn't anything unique, but even you are admitting here that they "improved on the original" They might have had a nice thought to compact the signal paths, but the QSC amps blow away the Behringers any day of the week. Clubs don't even consider Behringer anymore, because it costs more to replace garbage than to buy the RMX and leave it there.

Crown K2s get a premium for their name, and are probably overpriced, but K2s are still good amps. Maybe not a value, but, they are good workhorse amps.


They have some superb crossovers (and what is the DCX2496 copying?) for studio monitor and high fi speaker systems use, and the parts used are even top notch.
dbX DriveRacks?!

Their crossovers are okay, I wouldn't say superb. Kind of hit or miss, sometimes you get a good one, sometimes you get a bad one. Some of them hum, some of them are quiet. A lot of them the knobs they use get loose after travel. Typical cheap-chinese made stuff.



The EP amps work great for most people. The Ep2500 is built to a very high standard and even used military spec redundant boards.
For home audio they are fine. Especially on a tight budget. Kinda noisey for a home though.

I use Crest for my mobile gigs, and recently noticed how quiet they are. The CC series is quieter than my Playstation. Costs more than an EP obviously though.


Many of the newer mixers are great - in both parts quality and performance (and are very low noise). I don't have any clue which model(s) you used, but I am referring to their newer and small units, like the Xenyz line. No crap parts are used either, and the sliders on this line are high quality Alps units, as well as most of the rotary pots.
I've used some of their older mixers, and their newer and older DJ mixers. All the DJ mixers, new and old, have junk sliders.

Oh, you just reminded me of another gank of theirs:






The Truth B2030P monitor uses very high quality parts and build(from the drivers, to the crossover, to the cabinet itself), and measures excellent. Better than anything 2-3x the price by anyone, that I have ever observed.
You need to hear more monitors. The Truths are fine for a bedroom DJ, and its great to have a cheap monitor, but they don't hold a candle to M&K, Bag End, or even Mackie. Speaking of Mackie, Mackie also competes with companies like Genelec by making cheaper models that are supposed to be fairly comparable, but they don't make the product look exactly the same and try to trick people into buying it because it looks like something they are familiar with.



Sure, they have crap products too. I have never stated otherwise, in fact, I have pointed that out many times in the past. I would not touch their instrument effect pedals or instruments with a ten foot pole. Same goes for many of their other products. You just have to pick your products carefully.

-Chris
Behringer is a great entry for people who have a tight budget but want to make music. While I don't agree with their engineering practices, I do like that they are an entry point for a lot of people. I'd rather see people use M-Audio as their entry point, but nevertheless, if you need a cheap mixer, a cheap amp, a cheap this, Behringer stuff usually works. Using good gear isn't going to make or break a good DJ from a bad one, or a good song from a bad song. I don't knock people for buying Behringer products, when I first started out I was so broke I'd use /anything/. First time I DJ'd I had one good turntable and one that was so bad beatmatching was almost impossible, and the motor was so dead I had to push the platter most of the time to get it to mix.

..

I'm not going to sit here let people rag on Bose for shady business practices and then have someone say "people should buy Behringer!!!!!"

Nothing personal, really. I know there are products I love that people talk bad about or don't like and I get a little fussed about it, but, its just a difference of opinion. No beef with you brotha. :) It doesn't sound like you were taking offense, but, I wanted to add this just in case I was coming off cross because I don't mean to be. :)
 
no. 5

no. 5

Audioholic Field Marshall
Frequency responses are usually measured with testing equipment set up in an anechoic chamber. An anechoic chamber is an isolated room designed so that sound will not reflect off any surfaces. Giving out such frequency response results is terrific- for those people who live in anechoic chambers!
That's like saying; "you don't need markings on that tape measure, you're not measuring anything important."

But the sad thing is that Bose isn't the only one who fails to provide relevant data. The only FR information available for any* consumer loudspeaker is something like "60Hz to 20kHz +/- 3dB", and what does that tell you?

NOTHING!

Absolutely no relevant data is available from the manufacturers, if the speakers you want happen to have been reviewed by publication that performs reliable test it's not so bad, but there are a ton of speakers available, only a relative few ever get tested. This is a situation that needs to change, the industry needs to provide relevant data to consumers.





*well, maybe not any, but all the ones I can think of.
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
Hey, I own a Bose system...

It looks great...

It sounds great...

...It's just not plugged in.:D
 
Gryfter

Gryfter

Audioholic Intern
Did Bose ever make quality speakers or have they always been "drastically over priced budget speakers"?
 
M

markw

Audioholic Overlord
Did Bose ever make quality speakers or have they always been "drastically over priced budget speakers"?
The 901s, when properly positioned in the proper room and played with certain music can sound uncannily realistic. Likewise, the 301s can sound decent, albeit a bit overpriced.

I think the gripe most people have with Bose here revolves around these "acoustimass" speakers, but they are exactly what a large segment of the population wants, and their highly effective advertising campaign gets 'em right between the eyes..

They want small, attractive, easy to set up and use sound producing appliances, not a hi-fi system, and they are willing to pay a premium for it.
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top