HTnewbie said:
Chad -
Thanks for the feedback. Given I posted in both the speaker/sub and receiver forums and got a fair number of views with no replies I was getting nervous that I was "off message" or something. I think Bag End's anonimity put some folks off.
Bag End is far from annoymous in the pro industry, but, yeah, around here most might have heard OF them but are not familiar with them.
HTnewbie said:
Thus, my owning these speakers was "accidental" in the sense that I would have had to spend $5-10K to buy comparable Paradigms, etc. Given I was building the HT system from scratch, I figured I could work in from the speakers.
....more, probably. I'm not sure where the HT stuff MSRPs, but, if it's near the pro stuff (and I bet it is since they seem to be extremely simular - kind of reminds me of M&K pro vs. consumer) you probably have circa 15k + worth of Bag End gear.
HTnewbie said:
Anyway, given we are getting into our new home I have not had a chance to really audition the units. However, I did hook up two of the 8" monitors to my 1977 vintage Pioneer SX650 and played a variety of CDs in a less than acoustically optimal room. All I can say is I was WOWED by the sound (I used Paradigm bookshelf previously). Even without a sub, these 8" units produce a far amount of bass which was fine for the material. Probably not enough for some whiz-bang DVD movie material but plenty for Christmas Carols, Basia, Aerosmith and various classical music (the 1812 Overture was a revelation). Cymbals were crisp and smooth, horns sweet and vocals warm (I am no audiophile but these adjectives sound about right). If the SX650 were even partially HT capable, I would not need a new AVR. If will be paired with the 6" monitors in my office after that experience.
My experiance with Bag End is limited to night clubs and lounges back home in Miami. So, the only media I have heard them play is trance, downtempo trance, ambient, deep trance, and a bit of house. However, they reproduce those beautifully and POWERFULLY.
HTnewbie said:
As for the 95 hz issue, the Bag End subs and 8" monitors meet at that point. During my research phase I spent some time speaking with two of Bag Ends in-house guys and came away confident that used together these products were well matched. One was a HT enthusiast and was the guy who talked me into considering twin 18" subs.
Oh, yeah, they are designed to match flawlessly. The trouble I see is that if you crossover at 95Hz to your subwoofer, when the subwoofer plays those higher notes, they may be roughly localizable. That's probably one of the reasons why that gentlemen recommended the two 18" subs. Beyond the awesome output of having two well powered 18" drivers, you could then put them on the Left and Right channel and then the localization problem would be null. The other advantage of the two subwoofers is it is easier to reproduce even bass response. They compress the room more evenly.
Subwoofers are said to be non-localizable, but the higher frequencies you have them play the easier it is to localize those sounds. I may be incorrect, but I'm pretty sure 90 is very boarderline.. I'd be interested to hear what someone more educated on the topic has to say about that.
It's NOT a design flaw of Bag End... their speakers roots were designed to have extremely high output (with clearity) and so having a main go down to 80Hz is just asking for reliability problems. Those drivers are operating in their most effecient range of frequencies. At extremely high SPL levels, asking an 8" driver to reproduce 80Hz sounds is actually pretty stressful on most! Most of their applications have multiple subwoofers so they have those large drivers do a wider range of frequencies than consumer items.
HTnewbie said:
However, that does make finding in-ceiling rear surround units a little more of a challenge but that's half the fun (right?!).
You should call Bag End and see what they recommend. I'm kind of at a loss with recommendations and no one else seems to be chiming in with regards to that. I'm a huge fan of M&K (mksound.com), and they have a badass selection of inwall rears that will be able to keep up with the Bag Ends in terms of volume and quality, but I'm not sure about timbre matching them. You could also look into Triad, who also have great inwall selections. Both M&K and Triad are rather expensive though, but, since you got the Bag Ends at such a deal, maybe spending money on the rears won't be so bad.
HTnewbie said:
Lastly, putting an 18" sub, never mind two, several paces away from our kitchen would not be a positive contributor to marital harmony. As it is my wife has no idea what level of sound the proposed setup will produce (I can knock the basement walls down in 2005).
With a pair of 18" in the front with those mains, you will have a simply fantastic setup once you build your seperate home theater. And for the time being, to keep the wife happy, you will still love having the 12" sub with those mains until the theater is ready. Gotta keep the wifey happy.
Don't piss her off with those 18s and have her make you sell them or anything crazy! Keep 'em for your theater! My dads friend had a professional Apogee subwoofer, the size of a dining room table (maybe 200lbs too). He thought it would be ok to put it in the living room until the theater was ready, and ended up selling it to my dad for cheap when the wife freaked out. The only place he could put it was in place of the coffee table... and you couldn't really set anything on it because it would literally vibrate off. and it was huge and black with metal brackets for moving it by pully and metal edges for durability.
It was halarious to see it in place of the coffee table. But, killed martial harmony.
-Chad