Could you share some about why you chose the Cinema 50 over anything else that's out right now in a 9 ch. AVR? I'm mired in the details right now myself and looking for clear reasons to choose one over the other (besides the fact that the Marantz is the best looking of the bunch).
Lots of folks are big on the new Denons, and for the $2500 MSRP you're only a stone's throw away from an Anthem or maybe NAD, or maybe a used Arcam....
I'm very attracted to the Marantz, but it seems to be in an odd middle ground---I wonder if there are (significantly) better sounding options for a similar price point, OR if there are similar performance options for a significantly lower price.
Well, Its kind of a long story but I originally ordered an Arcam AVR11 after I sold my old Marantz processor prematurely, the Arcam was taking a little longer then expected so I made some calls and just so happened I could get this Marantz unit the next day so I did.
The main reason I did the upgrade is because I recently bought an LG C2 OLED and wanted HDMI 2.1 capability I also wanted something with Dirac (even if I had to wait a couple months)
Funny thing is I already sold this Marantz cinema 50 unit off to a client/friend of mine once I discovered it wasn't "Roon Ready" I don't like HEOS but without researching that aspect I discovered that I'd have to buy an external streamer to get what I wanted from my TIDAL subscription.
Now I went back to my original plan and bought an Arcam AVR11 due to arrive this week and I should have everything I wanted (based on specs) and I won't have to run a separate streamer or wait for Dirac Live It will be my first time using Arcam and if I don't like it I'll just have to wait to see what else drops and flip it. Cost isn't much a big deal to me as I'm in the industry and don't pay retail for any of those brands.