I am in the process of laying out my HT, and I am faced with an interesting design decision. I have approximately 50 feet of cable distance between my main electronics cabinet and the front left/right/center speaker location, and I am assessing two options:
option 1: run large (10-12 ga) speaker cable to the speakers, locate power amps in main cabinet, short interconnect cables between pre/pro and power amp
option 2: run line level interconnects from main cabinet (preouts on pre/pro) to power amp located adjacent to main speakers, short speaker cable lengths to speakers.
I have two amp options for the mains: a 3 channel Adcom 5503 with unbalanced connectors, and a Rotel RB-1080 2 channel/Outlaw 2200 monoblock with balanced and unbalanced connectors.
I currently have two pre/pro options: a Denon 3806 and an Outlaw 970, both which have unbalanced preouts only. I plan to use one in the HT, the other in an adjacent a/v room. I do not currently have a way to run a balanced line level interconnect between the pre/pro and the remote power amp.
50 feet seems to be right on the edge of acceptability for an unbalanced line level interconnect, but I wanted to ask if anyone here had any experience running unbalanced cables of this length-the signal will be pre-amplified from the receiver, so it is not as small a signal level as that for a microphone or other similar small signal device. The speaker cable run, OTOH, would probably only suffer from a voltage drop that would reduce the max power capability at the speaker terminals. The HT room is 3000 cf, and I am using relatively inefficient Dynaudio speakers for the mains (homebuilt Xennon 3 ways and a TBD 3 way center channel based on Dynaudio drivers).
I have considered swapping the Outlaw 970 for a 990, but I want to make sure I need a balanced interface before I do that.
Comments?