Little space for Sub? - Paradigm Seismic12

C

cownd

Junior Audioholic
Below is quoted out of a review of a PB12-Ultra/2 and is compared to a Seismic 12 from Paradigm. Yes The SVS is better, but for what it's worth the Seismic is no slouch!! For those of you with high WAF's or limited space, I recommend this little beast.


The PB12-Ultra/2 arrived in a well-designed, densely padded container on a nifty mini-pallet. According to SVS, this "mini-pallet, lift-off packaging" was borrowed from the appliance industry -- and, at 26"H x 19"W x 29"D and 190 pounds

About five of Paradigm’s brand-new Seismic 12 subwoofers ($1700 each) would fit inside a PB12-Ultra/2. Yet the Paradigm’s in-room response is specified at just two cycles above the SVS’s. I recently auditioned the Seismic 12 and found its performance impressive despite its size. More important, it was not a one-note boom-boom machine -- its excellent definition and extension are much better than those of other one-cubic-foot subs I’ve heard. So why would someone choose the larger, more expensive SVS over the Paradigm? Well, it’s the PB12-Ultra/2’s very size that enables it to produce cleaner, tighter bass with significantly more impact.

Still, the Seismic 12 is no slouch, and possesses some impressive technology. A Paradigm-designed, overbuilt, 12" downfiring woofer is flanked by two 10" passive radiators in a sealed enclosure. The radiators effectively do the same job as the tuned ports on the SVS. Like an organ’s pipes, the port diameter and length are tuned to a certain frequency, while radiators are weighted to resonate at a specific frequency. This is less a case of one way being better than the other than of dealing with the space constraints of a smaller box. A small box also requires Paradigm to use considerable equalization to boost response at 17Hz. On paper, the 4500W peak rating of the Seismic 12’s class-D amplifier may appear more powerful than the SVS, but the Seismic’s equalization circuit compromises its efficiency. The much larger PB12-Ultra/2 uses only a small amount of EQ to clean up frequency-response anomalies; therefore, most of its 2.4kW of peak power makes it to the TV-12 drivers.

Basic connections and controls are similar. Its smaller size makes the Seismic 12 much easier to position and calibrate, and the Paradigm has a balanced XLR connection where the SVS offers only unbalanced RCA-type ins and outs. But the SVS offers parametric EQ instead of the Paradigm’s 60Hz boost control for "added impact."
 
furrycute

furrycute

Banned
When I look for subs, I prefer clean, tight, fast, bass response. I especially abhor those huge subs that pump out earth shattering boomy, noisy, one note bass that drowns out all other sound spectrum. I absolutely cannot stand those kind of subs.

How does the SVS compare to the Paradigm in this regard?

Paradigm used to build those 12inch servo subs in sealed enclosures that blended seemlessly with a lot of speakers.
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top