Itching to upgrade .. Where to start?

J

johnnyblaze313

Enthusiast
Current and first system bought last year mostly used for movies and gaming..

pioneer vsx 820

fluence avhtb 5.1 system

Klipsch sw-450 sub

Room size 20x16

Looking for a more room filling experience. I think ??

I was thinking about buying a new center and a set of towers (almost bought the classias yesterday on sale but decided to research some more) and putting the 2 fluence mains I have now as my rears.

Sound like a decent way to go?

I also would like to add another sub eventually or would I benefit more from another sub now and get towers and center later?

Also any suggestions for towers? I prefer to bargain shop for quality the reason the classia interested me was the sale price. Currently I'm eyeballing the kef q700 and q 900 on acc 4 less @ $469 and $569 ea

Thanks for any input guys
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
You ain't the only one, buddy!

You know I have the Revel Salon2, Linkwitz Orion, and KEF 201/2 speakers, and I'm EYEING the KEF Q900!:eek:

Great speakers measurements on HTMag.

Stereophile is coming out with the Q900 review/measurements too. So if the measurements also look great on Stereophile, the Q900s will be even harder to resist.:D
 
BoredSysAdmin

BoredSysAdmin

Audioholic Slumlord
Current and first system bought last year mostly used for movies and gaming..

pioneer vsx 820

fluence avhtb 5.1 system

Klipsch sw-450 sub

Room size 20x16

Looking for a more room filling experience. I think ??

I was thinking about buying a new center and a set of towers (almost bought the classias yesterday on sale but decided to research some more) and putting the 2 fluence mains I have now as my rears.

Sound like a decent way to go?

I also would like to add another sub eventually or would I benefit more from another sub now and get towers and center later?

Also any suggestions for towers? I prefer to bargain shop for quality the reason the classia interested me was the sale price. Currently I'm eyeballing the kef q700 and q 900 on acc 4 less @ $469 and $569 ea

Thanks for any input guys
What's your total budget? $1200?
 
BoredSysAdmin

BoredSysAdmin

Audioholic Slumlord
You ain't the only one, buddy!
You know I have the Revel Salon2, Linkwitz Orion, and KEF 201/2 speakers, and I'm EYEING the KEF Q900!:eek:
That's because you're one crazy, obsessed audioholic :D;)

OP: Btw: did you tried to move speakers away from walls and run auto-config ?
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
Revel C12 center $475
Revel F12 front L/R $1,300

Authorized dealer out the door.

Or those KEF Q900 + Q600
 
GranteedEV

GranteedEV

Audioholic Ninja
Current and first system bought last year mostly used for movies and gaming..

pioneer vsx 820

fluence avhtb 5.1 system

Klipsch sw-450 sub

Room size 20x16

Looking for a more room filling experience. I think ??

I was thinking about buying a new center and a set of towers (almost bought the classias yesterday on sale but decided to research some more) and putting the 2 fluence mains I have now as my rears.

Sound like a decent way to go?

I also would like to add another sub eventually or would I benefit more from another sub now and get towers and center later?

Also any suggestions for towers? I prefer to bargain shop for quality the reason the classia interested me was the sale price. Currently I'm eyeballing the kef q700 and q 900 on acc 4 less @ $469 and $569 ea

Thanks for any input guys
I recommend this

Two EMP e55ti tower speakers
One KEF IQ60 center speaker
Corner Bass traps.
Diffusion Panels at the back of the room/
And three Rythmik FV15 subwoofers.
 
J

johnnyblaze313

Enthusiast
Those emp's intrigue me moslty cause the discounted blemished section.

So nobody has recommended buying a sub instead of towers so I am assuming it would be in my best interest to focus my money on towers over another sub for the moment ??
 
GranteedEV

GranteedEV

Audioholic Ninja
Those emp's intrigue me moslty cause the discounted blemished section.

So nobody has recommended buying a sub instead of towers so I am assuming it would be in my best interest to focus my money on towers over another sub for the moment ??
A tower and multiple subs!!!
 
B

bikdav

Senior Audioholic
Current and first system bought last year mostly used for movies and gaming..

pioneer vsx 820

fluence avhtb 5.1 system

Klipsch sw-450 sub

Room size 20x16

Looking for a more room filling experience. I think ??

I was thinking about buying a new center and a set of towers (almost bought the classias yesterday on sale but decided to research some more) and putting the 2 fluence mains I have now as my rears.

Sound like a decent way to go?

I also would like to add another sub eventually or would I benefit more from another sub now and get towers and center later?

Also any suggestions for towers? I prefer to bargain shop for quality the reason the classia interested me was the sale price. Currently I'm eyeballing the kef q700 and q 900 on acc 4 less @ $469 and $569 ea

Thanks for any input guys
The Pioneer VSX-820 receiver can definitely stay. That is a lot of receiver for the money.
 
F

FirstReflection

AV Rant Co-Host
You ain't the only one, buddy!

You know I have the Revel Salon2, Linkwitz Orion, and KEF 201/2 speakers, and I'm EYEING the KEF Q900!:eek:

Great speakers measurements on HTMag.

Stereophile is coming out with the Q900 review/measurements too. So if the measurements also look great on Stereophile, the Q900s will be even harder to resist.:D
You confuse me, Acu, you really do :p

Please take this in the spirit in which it's intended (which is lighthearted)...

You seem to enjoy seeing professional measurements of speakers - those measurements seem to have at least a slight influence on you when it comes to which achingly expensive speakers you decide to try next (you lucky bastard :p ).

And yet, you pooh-pooh the measureable effects of room treatments!

I'm just so confused by that :eek:

All of those lovely speaker measurements are either conducted in an anechoic chamber or in as close to an anechoic scenario as possible. Stick those same speakers into any real-world room and take a measurement from the seating position and they won't look anywhere near flat.

I dunno, perhaps you're just used to your room's acoustics and you prefer those acoustics over a treated environment. But I just find it bizarre that you're willing to shell out large quantities of cash for some of the coolest speakers out there, but then say to "not spend a penny" on acoustically treating your room!

I think it's totally fine to prefer your room's acoustics. If it's just you as an individual, it's all about enjoyment and personal preference 100%. But I just can't agree with telling other people, especially newbies, that acoustic treatments aren't worth the relatively low cost.

I just take my cues from the handful of professional mixers and sound engineers with whom I am acquainted. I've just enjoyed my limited time in their studios so much and found those experiences to be so enlightening! Those mixing studios are heavily damped and pretty darn "dead" sounding. "Deader" than my small home theater since I've used diffusion in addition to absorption and bass trapping. But the resolution, detail and clarity of those mixing studios. It's just an eye-opener (or ear-opener as the case may be). My friend's studio in which he uses Focal SM11 monitors - I've just never heard any other system where the tiniest 0.5dB alterations are genuinely noticeable; and there's just no way that those minute details - even from such amazing speakers as the SM11 monitors - would be audible if it were not for his studio being virtually anechoic.

If there's one thing I've learned though, it's that there is no "right" or "wrong" in audio. There are no standards like there are in video. No coordinates for a calibrator to target, no delta E tolerances to consider. Pro audio mixers are OBSESSED with the concept of "translatability" - where what they consider to be the most vital parts of the audio recording come across clearly, more or less regardless of the playback system. They want listeners to be able to play their tracks on iPod earbuds, car audio systems, $200 HTiB speakers or mega-buck "audiophile" speakers and have the track sound good on ALL of them. Not the same, obviously, but still enjoyable and with the most vital parts of the mix always present and intact. That's their job and that's their goal. But in the pursuit of that goal, they also strive to mix in an environment where every detail and smallest alteration is laid bare so that they can accurately gauge whether or not each change they make is having the desired effect.

So for me, I can't help but think of the room's affect on the sound as anything other than - strictly speaking - a distortion. All of those lovely graphs and measurements, they're meaningless when you put them in an untreated room. I don't aim to take the room completely out of the equation. That's impractical and one might as well just listen to headphones if that's what one's after. But I firmly believe that reducing the strong, early reflections and reducing standing waves and echoes is a vital part of the audio system as a whole. And I just think it's a disservice to all the fancy gear that we all lust after to dismiss room treatments as an equal partner in the audio experience.

That's all...y'know...short and to the point from me...always...

lol :p
 
J

johnnyblaze313

Enthusiast
The Pioneer VSX-820 receiver can definitely stay. That is a lot of receiver for the money.
Very glad to hear I was a bit worried maybe Im gonna end up with to much speaker and not enough reciever ..

I seen vanns has a call in sale buy select 2 towers and get a free center, gonna call them this week to see what towers are included ..
 
3db

3db

Audioholic Slumlord
Even the best speakers will sound like sh?t in an acoustically bad room. I too advocate room treatments to smooth out the irregularities. Although the room correction s/w on receviers can smooth out a lot, they can't compensate for everything. ;)
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
I just take my cues from the handful of professional mixers and sound engineers...
Even the best speakers will sound like sh?t in an acoustically bad room.
And I take my cues from Peter Aczel of The Audio Critic and Siegfried Linkwitz who wrote:

Much has been written in the popular and professional audio press about the acoustic treatment of rooms. The purpose of such treatment is to allow us to hear more of the loudspeaker and less of the room. I am convinced that a properly designed sound system can perform well in a great variety of rooms and requires only a minimum of room treatment if any at all.


http://www.linkwitzlab.com/rooms.htm

I bought 4 large acoustic panels/bass traps to try out in my room. They made 0% impact. Why should I recommend to EVERYONE on earth to spend good money on acoustic panels/bass traps?

There was also another forum member who bought 2 acoustic panels to try out. He also said they made zero difference. He returned his 2 panels. I was too lazy to return my 4 large panels, so I just put them underneath my daughter's bed.:D

Floyd Toole and Sean Olive do NOT believe that every single room should be treated with acoustic panels either.

If you have great speaker designs with great polar responses, and your room is not a beast, chances are you won't need to spend any money on acoustic panels if your speakers are accurate and have great polar responses.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
AJinFL, whom I respect a lot for his vast loudspeaker knowledge, told me that he also recommends the KEF Q900 (the new Q series). He has heard those new KEF drivers and said that those KEF drivers are good enough for him.

I'm sure Stereophile will confirm the recommendation with their upcoming review of the KEF Q900 speakers.:D
 
BoredSysAdmin

BoredSysAdmin

Audioholic Slumlord
Linkwitz gives a very good advice on placing speakers, but in my case (and MANY , MANY others) you just can't place the speakers 3 feet from the wall.... This creates acoustic issues which needs to be addressed.
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
I think the best advice would be to borrow some acoustic panels (or make sure the dealer has a great return policy) and see if the panels help the sound at all.

Why waste money if they don't even help your speakers, right?

Clearly every situation is different.

I don't think it's accurate to say EVERY single room and loudspeaker needs acoustic panels or vice versa.

If your budget is $1,200, why blindly waste $400 on some panels if they may do NOTHING to benefit your speakers/room?

Here you go:

http://www.amazon.com/Auralex-Obsidian-ProPanels-Fabric-wrapped-Fiberglass/dp/B001D4CQTU/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1311950469&sr=8-3

Try these out directly from Amazon.com.

If they don't work, just return them and say the reason for return is that "They Don't Work!"
 
Last edited:
BoredSysAdmin

BoredSysAdmin

Audioholic Slumlord
I think the best advice would be to borrow some acoustic panels (or make sure the dealer has a great return policy) and see if the panels help the sound at all.

Why waste money if they don't even help your speakers, right?

Clearly every situation is different.

I don't think it's accurate to say EVERY single room and loudspeaker needs acoustic panels or vice versa.

If your budget is $3K, why blindly waste $500 - $750 on some panels if they may do NOTHING to benefit your speakers/room?

Here you go:

http://www.amazon.com/Auralex-Obsidian-ProPanels-Fabric-wrapped-Fiberglass/dp/B001D4CQTU/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1311950469&sr=8-3

Try these out directly from Amazon.com.

If they don't work, just return them and say the reason for return is that "They Don't Work!"
Possibly diffusers on wall behind the speakers ?
http://www.realtraps.com/video_diffusors.htm
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top