Those I listed before indeed had higher THD but in practice whether the THD is 0.01% or 0.005% won't make any audible difference and I was not referring to specs published on the manufacturers websites. I have the impression that you maybe putting too much emphasis on website distortions specs.
Let's look at some examples:
MCA525 specs: 0.001% at 1 kHz, 0.015% at 20 kHz, at 100W, Note: That's 44% of full rated output.
My Denon AVR-3805 was probably specified 0.05% THD, but bench tested 0.001% at 1 kHz, 69.8W, that's 58% of full load, so better than the MCA525 on paper right?
Given such a low THD at 1 kHz at 100W really doesn't mean much for several reasons such as:
- THD/IMD alone don't necessarily determine the overall sound quality.
- Everything else being equal, humans can't tell the difference between 0.05% and 0.001% THD
- THD+N/IMD changes over the audible 20-20,00 Hz range, also varies with power output.
I am sure you have done your research to know there are more reasons than what I listed above, why you cannot just compare manufacturers website specs, though it is reasonable to compare those among the same manufacturer's own product line, such as comparing the MCA to the P series, both by Anthem.
Now, for amps you can buy in the UK that has comparable or better published specs:
Bryston SST amps: <0.005% THD/or IMD, typically 0.002%, full bandwidth at full rated output.
Cambridge Audio 851E: <0.001%, 1 kHz, <0.005% 20 - 20,000 Hz.
I am sure there are other examples for amps that might have specified lower THD than your Anthem including but that's really not my point.
My point is that you can't just read the marketing information, i.e. from product brochures, website specs etc. If you do, you will be sticking with your Anthem MCA525 for sure even though similarly price amps such as ATI's (highly regarded on this forum), Parasound Halo series, Rotel's RMB series; and even Anthem's own P series that costs a lot more with a little bit better published THD at 1 kHz, 0.0007 vs 0.001% that could be your viable alternatives.
Again, in the same lab, the AVtech, the MCA225's THD+N was actually tested slightly worse than the AVR-3805 that is just a 7.1 channel receiver with both prepro and power amp build in, though on paper the Anthem shows much better numbers. To be clear, I am not suggesting the 3805 is a equally good or better sounding amp than the MCA amps, not at all. I am just making the point on comparing distortion specs. From my own experience though, if I can't see my amps, I could be listening to the receiver thinking that I am listening to my Halo amp and Cambridge Audio preamp, at lest that's the case in my systems using either the LS50+sub or R900 speakers.