RichB

RichB

Audioholic Field Marshall
At first, I was a little surprised by lack of bass with the Ascends. After having them a while, I realize they don't lack bass, it's just accurate. To get the lower octaves that I love, I NEED a sub.
Adding a sub seems like a good idea.
If only we can find some folks who could recommend a good sub :p :D

Since you do not have EQ, a sub with equalization might be a good idea.

- Rich
 
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
Yep just two channels. I started this sound system build after I lost my last setup in divorce. At first I was PISSED that she got stuff that belonged to me before we ever met. :mad: Then I realized, it was just stuff. :rolleyes: Now I have a fresh start and can build a better system. :D

It's not in the same room or even the same house. Yep, you guessed it, she got that too. I would liked to have set it up so the fronts were on the short wall facing the length of the room. Alas, the house was built in the 30's and people didn't think about such things then. In truth, it had more to do with the leather sectional my girlfriend wanted. :p This is a rental, it's cheap for now. I'll be looking to buy a house again. A bigger house. That's why I went with towers instead of bookshelves. I have always preferred towers anyway. Eventually it will be 5.2, maybe 7.2 someday who knows.

I got the Sherbourn, even though it didn't have room correction, because it didn't have all the other features I didn't need as well. Current receivers have too much c**p I don't need and not enough of what I do. I'm kinda old skool that way. Reviews were excellent as far as sound and video quality. Plus I got it for 700 bucks new.

I realized the first time I heard the Ascends, that a speaker with a flat response, was a whole different breed than what I was used to. I loved them immediately. But now that I've had them a few months, I'm not turning them up as loud, fanning my feathers so to speak. I'm settling back into old habits of mellow listening well into the night. Still rock out about once a week tho. ;) At first, I was a little surprised by lack of bass with the Ascends. After having them a while, I realize they don't lack bass, it's just accurate. To get the lower octaves that I love, I NEED a sub.
Thanks, that clarifies a lot. ADTG is going to tell you how impressed he is with DEQ for "mellow listening" or even a little louder, that comes from a guy with lots of nice gear. Still, no harm trying to move a little closer at a time to find that sweet spot for better bass. And, sorry about the divorce and the loss of some audio gear..
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
ADTG swears by Audyssey DynamicEQ and I'm a big fan too. But, it only compensate for the bass. Specifically, as volume goes down it dynamically increases the low end. It makes for fuller punchy bass even at lower listening levels. The other day I tried to watch a late night movie with DEQ off and it felt very dissatisfying.

That said, Audyssey's DEQ will do nothing for mid and treble dynamics. XT32 and SubEQ on the other hand will. They are the auto room corrections for mains and subs respectively. Since they correct linear response and try to improve time domain issues, this goes a long way in improving overall dynamics. I am very impressed by XT32 and SubEQ, but ADTG prefers to keep them disengaged or run in L/R Bypass mode. So, YMMV here.
Yup. I could have kept Audyssey Flat + DEQ also. I really can't tell the difference between Flat vs. Bypass.

As soon as I get my new RBH SX-T2/R I will have to re-run Audyssey again. :D
 
Last edited:
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
And, sorry about the divorce and the loss of some audio gear..
The divorce and breaking up of a family itself is already tragic. Losing audio gears in the process is adding salt to wounds. :(
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top