I didn't think I'd get this kind of grief from a simple statement.
My speakers don't suck for bass. They go deep enough for the music I prefer. I like having a 2.0 system, I like it a lot. Maybe "can't fit a subwoofer" doesn't apply from the strictly physical space standpoint, but putting one in the space would not look good in my home office. My wife and I are architects and interior designers, therefore our home is our showroom. I already have a bookshelf in the room where the components sit, flanked by the towers, which are flanked by 2 doors. I also have a chais lounge in the center, and 2 workstations across the room. A sub would look inappropriate anywhere except in the opposite corners, but that's where the CPUs are located for the workstations because between the workstations there's a cabinet... Maybe if you're not a designer you can't quite visualize the room, but there's a big reason why I chose a 2.0 system with towers instead of a 2.1 with bookshelf speakers and a sub. These personal and professional reasons supercede the "need" for a sub, therefore I CAN'T have one in the room. I hope this is clear. If anyone has more opinions on why I should or could have one if I really wanted it, please refrain and keep it to yourselves.
The title of the thread is "I guess I'll never be a true audiophile". I'm realizing that in addition of loving my budget system and not pining for upgrades as I stated in the first post, another reason is because I prefer not having a sub that would diminish the room aesthetics over deeper bass that I don't think I need.