Help on Three things.

nova

nova

Full Audioholic
zumbo said:
Lets check this quote again. It states the 773 is way more than those speakers would need. And it states that a $200 Sony would drive this system. Drive it with utter disappointment.
Didn't say you would want to drive them with a Sony, only that you could. The Monitor 11's are pretty efficient speakers and the 773 will (my opinion) be able to deliver more than they "need",... I am not saying you couldn't do better with a different receiver or separates.
 
Z

zumbo

Audioholic Spartan
nova said:
Didn't say you would want to drive them with a Sony, only that you could. The Monitor 11's are pretty efficient speakers and the 773 will (my opinion) be able to deliver more than they "need",... I am not saying you couldn't do better with a different receiver or separates.
I am fine with our conversation, we pretty much feel the same way. It was the Sony part that I let get to me.:eek: My second response to this was for PENG. Sorry.
 
Last edited:
nova

nova

Full Audioholic
zumbo said:
I am fine with our conversation, we pretty much feel the same way. It was the Sony part that I let get to me.:eek: .
Me too. Nice civil conversation. As far as the Sony goes,.... well it kinda makes a point about the Monitor's efficiency :D
I'd like to test that theory, anyone want to give me a set of Monitor 11's and I'll see if a Sony 995 will drive them OK ;)
 
Z

zumbo

Audioholic Spartan
nova said:
Me too. Nice civil conversation. As far as the Sony goes,.... well it kinda makes a point about the Monitor's efficiency :D
I'd like to test that theory, anyone want to give me a set of Monitor 11's and I'll see if a Sony 995 will drive them OK ;)
Hey, my Grandma drives "OK.":eek:
 
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
zumbo said:
Lets check this quote again. It states the 773 is way more than those speakers would need. And it states that a $200 Sony would drive this system. Drive it with utter disappointment.

There is no way that any receiver is more than they would need. They would love nothing more than to have a 300 X 2 strapped to 'em. That would be just about right. PENG, I am shocked. You are one of the sharpest people here. What gives?
If you put it that way, I am in agreement. I should have said the NADT773 is a good enough match for his Paradigm Monitor 11's, and of course those big Monitor 11's can benefit from higher end receivers or separates but that goes without saying.

I have listened to all sorts of Paradigm speakers and only the Signature Series impressed me in terms of resolution and being musical. The Studios are fine too but anything below the Studios are just decent sounding speakers.

The NADT773 and the Arcam AVR300 are both priced at around C$2,000, the NAD packs 7X110W (even into 4 ohms, all channels driven at the same time (whether you need it or not), and weighs 52 lbs. That's not too shabby for the C$1,500, and 91dB (anechoic sensitivity) monitor 11. We should not judge everything based on their weights or prices, but they are just some general indicators. The main point is, the T773 is NAD's current flag ship receiver, and has a good reputation for being powerful and musical. Anyway, I think Cabal made a good choice, the AVR300 should serve his speakers very well.
 
Last edited:
C

Chief Wiggum

Audiophyte
Anthem

If you're going to spend about $2500 I'd say the NAD and Arcam you mentioned are very good choices for the Paradigms. I have monitor 7's with a T763 and it sounds great. Also Anthem is coming out with an AV reciever sometime early this year and it should be very good and less than $2500. You might want to look into the B & K 507. I think it's 2800 but a nice unit.
 
C

Cabal

Enthusiast
See here is the problem with seprates for me, I have not a clue what to look for.
But for Monitor 11's I do not think that the price I would have to jump up to in Seprates would make me feel good for just the Monitor 11's.

If I did do the Seprate way I would want better speakers all around than what I have at the moment.

From what I have read and seen the Arcam can handle the Monitor 11's with out an issue at all, and it sounds natural.

The Nad did not come to the plate with that warmth that the Arcam had shown. But the Nad did have the Power as well to play them just as well.

Now the Adcom I was thinking about it for a bit and the Hole HDMI thing is not ready for me yet. I love what it will do soon but I feel that HDMI has not come full circle yet.

But when it does I will be ready to upgrade my gear for a better set of gear in whole and be done again for a couple years.

But again I thank you guys a lot for being very open with me.
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top