Panny DMP-BDT500
Thanks John, I decided to go with the Panny DMP-BDT500, exceptional BD video and audio. It also has a real good analog stage for CD playback, I don't have any SACD or DVD audio discs, so I think the Panny is the more logical and value (price wise) option for how I intend to use it. I also noticed it uses four high quality Burr-Brown Dacs for the analog stage.
Panasonic DMP-BDT500 review - Blu-ray Player - Trusted Reviews
Cheers and Thanks, Jeff
It does matter. DACs do play a role, so if the player's analog section is better than your receiver, the player via analog will sound better.
How much better is hard to say. I had the 83 and it had good analog performance. When I upgraded it to the 83SE, the analog performance jumped quite a bit and is still actually better than the UMC-200. The 103 may be perfectly fine sound wise, but I'm going to have to expect the 105 to be a step up from it. So it sort of depends on what you're after. I feel my Panny BD-65 has a decent analog section and have no complaints about it. It isn't nearly as good as my 83SE, but I don't feel short changed when I listen to the Panny because it is
good enough. So it is a matter of what you are OK with.
I couldn't agree with that statement more.