
Mog
Audioholic Intern
Do you think Sgt. Slaughter or the "FRIDGE" Perry will be among the cast? What would be awesome is if at the end of the movie they gave some dumb public service announcement like at the end of each cartoon!
Hahahah. That WOULD be hilarious.Do you think Sgt. Slaughter or the "FRIDGE" Perry will be among the cast? What would be awesome is if at the end of the movie they gave some dumb public service announcement like at the end of each cartoon!![]()
Enya is the best!!!Yeah, it rocked all right. It rocked about as hard as an Enya concert.
To use your screen name, I've sure seen a hell of a lot better than Transformers 2.
No, but I didn't particularly wanted to mention a pee break"Water closet," perhaps? You wouldn't happen to have some French in your background, would you?
Yeah, I liker her too actually. Just not rockin' kind of music.Enya is the best!!!
"Kids, you shouldn't put one of the Wayans brothers in your movies, because that just guarantees that it's gonna suck."Do you think Sgt. Slaughter or the "FRIDGE" Perry will be among the cast? What would be awesome is if at the end of the movie they gave some dumb public service announcement like at the end of each cartoon!![]()
Same here buddy. I love both the cartons and had watched them a million time. I would definitely watched G I Joe no matter wat are the reviews?? Well for transformer 2 its not that.Man, you guys are brutal. Funny as hell, but brutal.
Yeah, you can tell by the trailers this ones gonna suck. Hell, just having that lame Wayans brother in it alone makes me not wanna see it. But it does have Ray Park as Snake Eyes. I'll probably rent it some day.
Hey, you know what always bugged me about GI Joe? No one ever died. Every time you saw a plane get blown up, you always saw the guy parachuting away. Come on, can't I have a tiny bit of realism in my war cartoons?
Then you missed out on some good Smurfette talk.I didn't read the thread...
It would be 'Boring' to re-film a comic book the same way year in year out. Change is good, brings it up to date, modernizing it.I saw it today. Ill give it a c+ b. Lil better than wolverine but not as good as transformers. I still have yet to figure out why directors feel the need to change stuff to their liking. If you remember the cartoon you will immediately recognize all the damn changes. The changes almost made me as mad as the ones they did in the second hulk movie(that really pissed me off). It was still a decent flick. If you have nothing else to do go see it (matinee ofcourse). So many changes.
I agree to a point. I just dont like them changing the story or humanizing a character. With the hulk he was getting tired, Running slow, Getting his *** kicked at the end....They just changed his powers and for what. The hulk dont get tired, He had cuts and bruises on him, He heals faster than wolverine! He was runnin slow *** hell as he gets madder he gets bigger and stronger, that didnt happen. That movie just pissed me off....ok rant over.It would be 'Boring' to re-film a comic book the same way year in year out. Change is good, brings it up to date, modernizing it.
Since I didn't follow the comic, I have no idea how accurate or inaccurate it is. I know it is a futuristic event though. I don't think I would bother with a GI Joe that was about the Korean war era on film today.
Same goes for the new Star Trek film. Since the original series was the best of the time. I certainly don't want to see the same old star ship depicted in the original series like, so obsolete looking.
I didn't like the Hulk because the movie sucked. Whether or not they made changes, that movie was crap.I agree to a point. I just dont like them changing the story or humanizing a character. With the hulk he was getting tired, Running slow, Getting his *** kicked at the end....They just changed his powers and for what. The hulk dont get tired, He had cuts and bruises on him, He heals faster than wolverine! He was runnin slow *** hell as he gets madder he gets bigger and stronger, that didnt happen. That movie just pissed me off....ok rant over.
That is why this thread existsAs for Gi they made changes as to who loves who, who is brother and sister, the color of the characters and other stupid things. that not updating its just changes that didnt need to be made
This is true, however that does not mean they should hand you two hours of action with no story what-so-ever, and as the ones who pay for these movies, we shouldn't allow Hollywood to continue to do so.to me, these kind of movie are not about the story. its about the ACTION !!!
Transformers 2 anyone????This is true, however that does not mean they should hand you two hours of action with no story what-so-ever, and as the ones who pay for these movies, we shouldn't allow Hollywood to continue to do so.
Very well said. Think the original Indiana Jones trilogy. Lots of action and a good story.Personally, I'm sick of Hollywood turning out stupid crap movies year after year. The people that defend these turds always say, "Come on, just enjoy it for what it is. It's an action movie, not Shakespeare."
True, but it doesn't hurt either.Gimme a break. You can make an action movie within the confines of a decent, coherent story. Just having lots of explosions and hot chicks doesn't make a movie worthwhile.