Gen Z person here; to put it mildly, this feels like a late April Fools joke or even a piece of satire. But since it's presented in a serious manner and I don't think there's a lot of younger people here, I'll put in my 0.02 USD:
There is no need to incorporate this sort of slang.
Besides the volatile manner of these slang terms (heck, just take a look at how once-popular memes eventually die out), it also "cheapens" the tone of the text: they're intended to be employed in casual conversation and build cohesion among friend groups, not so much for a review site that pledges to stomp out audiophilic snake oil with objective testing and analysis. If Audioholics decided to take a page out of Stanley Kubrick's book and adopt Nadsat words from A Clockwork Orange, I'd object for a similar reason: the book is meant to present a dystopia from the perspective of a teen where his use of Nadsat enhances the narrative, whereas a product review should be designed to inform readers about the qualities of a given product without intentionally confusing them with non-standard terms.
People that are genuinely interested in better audiovisual quality in the face of deceptive marketing tactics or outright lies will seek out honest reviews from sites like this, regardless of how old they are, and without the need for any particular set of slang terms. That's why I started visiting this website as part of my research on subwoofers, Dolby Atmos speakers, and so on while I was building my budget home theater.
Please don't try to attract a new audience by acting on some conceptions about them, but let them find you by continuing to do what you do best!
On a side note, this article in particular is what motivated me to register to comment after lurking this site for months.