
Swerd
Audioholic Warlord
I agree. Just how big an increase in impedance does it take before it becomes significant? Fig. 3-4 from Elliot's article is a good example. The red trace shows impedance vs. frequency without Zobel correction, and the green trace shows the same driver with Zobel correction.IMO, Zobel networks (for impedance compensation) should be used when designing passive crossovers on all drivers that show a significant increase in impedance with rising frequency.
In his text, Elliot says:
"Unless the impedance remains reasonably constant for at least 2 - 2.5 octaves above and below the crossover frequency, the network cannot be expected to provide a predictable response. As a direct result of this, a 6dB/octave passive crossover at (say) 300Hz is barely acceptable, because of the impedance peak of the woofer."
It really depends on the intended crossover frequency and slope. I don't think impedance of 10 ohms at roughly 800-1000 Hz is unacceptably large. But 20 ohms impedance at or above 2000 kHz is too large.
Based on the resonance frequency below 30 Hz, I'd guess this driver is a large woofer, maybe 8" or larger. I can easily imagine it used in a 3-way speaker, but not as a 2-way. I also would not try to make it work with a 1st order crossover slope, when a 4th order slope is very easily done. I also wouldn't choose a crossover frequency or a slope based on the impedance curve alone. I would at least want to see the SPL vs. frequency curve.
In short, trying to correct a driver's impedance outside the intended pass band is a waste of effort.
Discussing Zobel networks in a subwoofer does seem to be off-track.
Last edited: