C
Chu Gai
Audioholic Samurai
If and when you replace the timing belt, spend the extra and replace the tensioner.
You can't see the timing belt - it's inside the engine. That's why they tend to be expensive to replace - labour cost.All the belts I can see look like they're in pretty good shape. I think we replaced some of the belts when the tranny went. I'll them take a look when the oil gets changed.
Depending if / when it was last done. A shop would put a sticker on the timing cover or elsewhere under the hood. It would show the mileage at which the belt was replaced.So would it be expensive to have the check the timing belt and tensioner? Is it labor intensive to have them check that?
Slip of the handI understand, we all like to limit our spending to fun stuff.
However you'd be better off spending a little on proper scheduled maintenance, than big bucks on a major failure.
And yet, my wife never listens to me.Rick is so smart! S-M-R-T!
![]()
Yeah, but any of these factors occur only on a belt that is past a safe end-of-life. Visual inspections will only detect an urgent situation, not tell if the belt is past the service interval recommendation.A mechanic can absolutely tell if a belt needs replacement by visual inspection.
Elongation, pilling, galzing, cracking, material loss, contamination from leaking oil or coolant and misalignment from worn tensioner bearings.
Even EDPM belts that hide wear very well, can be inspected and measured for material loss.
Incorrect, my point was the best in this thread...The timing belt issue is the best point made in this thread.
I think it's simply a viable trade-off for someone that doesn't know when the belt was last changed.Yeah, but any of these factors occur only on a belt that is past a safe end-of-life. Visual inspections will only detect an urgent situation, not tell if the belt is past the service interval recommendation.
It happened to my brother-in-law a few years ago, with his Subaru. It just died while he was on the highway. He was able to pull over to the side of the road without a problem and he was lucky that there was no subsequent damage, other than the cost of a tow and the belt job.Timing belts are one of those things that aren't covered under most warranties unless you've got a soup to nuts service contract or for certain vehicles. Since they are suggested to be replaced at say something like 60K, they're not done either because people get taken aback at the price or they don't read the manual. For those who regularly trade their cars in at or around the time their basic warranty is to expire, they don't give a ah!t. It's the next guy's problem. It's more important that your car look good.
Certainly, it seems most folks get above and beyond mileage out of them. But when they break, you'll probably have to get your car towed to a center not of your choosing. Then you'll need to rent a car. It never happens at a good time and you find the final cost is way more because they got you by your balls.
Well I mean I feel like we probably all would like one of those when we're stressed but probably wish we didn't have to pay........oh wait you said belt job............It happened to my brother-in-law a few years ago, with his Subaru. It just died while he was on the highway. He was able to pull over to the side of the road without a problem and he was lucky that there was no subsequent damage, other than the cost of a tow and the belt job.
Subaru has two belts of unequal length and they run the oil pump from the longer one.It happened to my brother-in-law a few years ago, with his Subaru. It just died while he was on the highway. He was able to pull over to the side of the road without a problem and he was lucky that there was no subsequent damage, other than the cost of a tow and the belt job.
That must be one interesting sounding engine at that point......it's always the longer belt that drives the pump that starts to make a raping noise then subsequently fails.
OopsThat must be one interesting sounding engine at that point...