Thank you Eppie, Ski, TLS, AcuDefTechguy for your input.
@ski2xblack @TLS Guy @Eppie
Decreasing the screen size is definitely an option. If I do, I will buy an AT (acoustically transparent) screen—my current one is not. Also benefit of AT screen is that I can hide a lot of treatment behind without concern for aestheics.
I'm thinking 120" instead of the 150" I have now. Also, I can remove that door (we never close it), which would create some space. But I would still need to downsize the screen, otherwise the left speaker would be right by the door. Curious I have heard from some that AT screen can alter speaker acoustics. Myth of true?
@ski2xblack @TLS Guy because I was thinking perhaps I was misinterpreting the RT60 graph. I'm still curious, though, since I don't understand the dip between 100 to 200 myself... Is that because the fronts aren't creating enough bass, so the signal is weaker than it should be, or is something just really efficient at absorbing that? Thinking out loud, the only issue with the front three not creating enough bass between 100–200 Hz is that the SPL in that area is good.
The wall behind the movie screen faces the exterior. I have never opened it but its most liekly 2x4 studs possibly 2x6 and insulation in it. I might do away with insulation in the area where I am going to place the speakers if I do AT.
@TankTop5
Thanks for that insight. I felt that way about the Sopra's I listened to as well. It was a 2.1 setup but for movies it had a huge sweet spot.
Lastly I do actually have decent bit of flexibility in moving the subs. Do you think REW version of the crawl test can work so I don't have to move these ~150lb+ subs all around. where I can place one sub in main listening position and go take REW measurements (With no PEQ) and all potential placement positions to see which might be top 2 candidates?