Hey,
Thanks for your replies. I know there are no scientific evidence in favor of bi wiring, but I was curious. Honestly, it's not that much of a waste of time nor money - it took me like 3 minutes to plug two spare cables into the speakers. No money wasted, thus, and I can spare 3 minutes. I'm spending more posting this reply.
Anyway.
My set up is not very impressive, I'm afraid: 2 Monitor Audio RS1 speakers and a Rotel amp from the late seventies/early eighties (the model is called RA 612). The amp was kind of on the mid/high end of things back in the days. I read it was like 400 dollars when it was released.
I have no idea how the amp works, just that it has outputs for 4 speakers. I believe, like Markw, it's two channels with capability to run two sets of speakers. I have listened to the bi wired speakers at every position, but nothing too weird has happened: Position 1 = only mids, position 2 = only highs, position 1+2 = sounds normal, position "4 channel" = sounds normal, but more "veiled" than on position 1+2, like if treble was missing.
So, if I keep the bi wiring, I would obviously leave it at position 1+2, but I'd like to know what the actual difference between the positions "1+2" and "4 channel" might be.
Again, thanks for your help!
/bruno