My criticism is based on third party data. You know, data, the stuff that worthwhile speaker and sub reviews have. Without data we have no reliable way of determining how our audio gear performs. We need performance data so our audio equipment evaluations are something more than mere conjecture, or what you might call "baseless drivel".
Anyway, I argue from observations based on objective measurements, not some imagined vendetta, although the idea of a personal vendetta makes audio equipment discussion a lot more exciting, so let's pretend that is true. It is telling that in return for these technical criticisms, I get a lot of name-calling but rarely any serious counter-point to my arguments.