Anyone have a Sony STR-DA1500ES?

Cristofori

Cristofori

Audioholic
Hello All,

Having owned Sony ES equipment before, and having little interest and/or the funds available for a decent multi-channel system, I decided on a Sony STR-DA1500ES 2-channel stereo receiver which I recently purchased from Crutchfield. Other than Marantz (which I cannot afford at the moment), Sony is the only A/V manufacturer that makes the components with the most features that I want.

However, I have not been able to find ANY reviews on this receiver online or anywhere else. Does anybody here have one of these, or can provide me with any links with reviews? The usual places (Amazon, Crutchfield, Audioreview, etc.) have nothing, and the mainstream audio mags seem to ignore anything Sony that doesn't cost four figures.
 
Last edited:
Cristofori

Cristofori

Audioholic
Try here if you haven't yet:
Hey, thanks for that link! I came across that forum/group before, but didn't realize it was dedicated to Sony exclusively. However, there was still nothing there on the STR-DA1500ES I asked about, but I posted the same question there.

This must be a brand new unit that hasn't "been around the block" so to speak, either that or it's not a very good one. I shall soon find out for myself, and will write an honest review of what I think of it's merits. I may be the first to do so.

I suspect that this unit sits in the precarious position of being undesirable to the multi-channel movie crowd for obvious reasons, and not being good enough to be taken seriously by the audiophile stereo crowd.

I just wanted a well built, slightly upscale modern receiver with an aluminum faceplate and a phono stage at a decent price. Other than the Marantz SR4023 CI which is the same price ($499.99) but is not XM/Sirius ready, the Sony looks like the only game in town for me.

Does anybody here use the Marantz SR4023 CI receiver? What do you think of it? If it turns out the Sony sounds like crap, I will return it and probably exchange it for this unit from Marantz.
 
Last edited:
Cristofori

Cristofori

Audioholic
Take a look at the Onkyo 8555. I've got the 8255, which is similar but older, and it's a beast for the price. I actually used it to temporarily power my subwoofer and it worked suprisingly well.

http://www.amazon.com/Onkyo-TX-8555B-TX-8555-Stereo-Receiver/dp/B001AMUFMA
Thanks for the suggestions, but the HK and Onkyo doesn't have the build quality at those price levels that I'm looking for. No aluminum face plates, rigid chassis, etc. I'm looking for something a tad bit better than the standard mass market boxes, and from a company that makes the other matching components with the features I want.

I'm probably going to go with either the Sony ES receiver or the Marantz for now. As I mentioned before, I've already ordered the Sony ES receiver from Crutchfield. If I don't like the way it sounds, all exchange it for the Marantz, which is exactly the same price and comparable in build quality and features.

As far as Harmon Kardon goes, it looks to be mostly a home theater company, and wouldn't interest me. However, I didn't realize Onkyo made higher end, stand alone SACD players and integrated amps. I might consider this company if and when I decide to upgrade. How does the Audioholics crowd feel about Onkyo gear? They are a company that is almost entirely ignored in the higher end publications, Hi-Fi forums, and most of the online stores/catalogs I'm used to dealing with.

As a matter of fact, I can't recall ever getting a single recommendation for an Onkyo product from anywhere except on this forum, although I remember seeing the brand in stores from my younger years.

Apparently, they had a better marketing/sales department in the past!
 
Last edited:
S

skers_54

Full Audioholic
Onkyo/Integra (which is their high-end line) gets a lot of props for their AV receivers and pre-pros. They don't do much 2-channel stuff besides what I linked. Most of the mass-market brands including Marantz focus more on HT because that's where the money is. They leave most of the 2-channel stuff to botique brands.

Interstingly, Sony doesn't get much respect for their audio gear (even their ES line). They over-state their HT receivers' power output by more than other brands. Marantz, OTOH, tends to meet their spec and sometimes beat it by a bit. Not to say that your receiver won't sound good (I'm sure it will). It has the features and aesthetics you want, so enjoy it!
 
Cristofori

Cristofori

Audioholic
Onkyo/Integra (which is their high-end line) gets a lot of props for their AV receivers and pre-pros. They don't do much 2-channel stuff besides what I linked. Most of the mass-market brands including Marantz focus more on HT because that's where the money is. They leave most of the 2-channel stuff to botique brands.

Interstingly, Sony doesn't get much respect for their audio gear (even their ES line). They over-state their HT receivers' power output by more than other brands. Marantz, OTOH, tends to meet their spec and sometimes beat it by a bit. Not to say that your receiver won't sound good (I'm sure it will). It has the features and aesthetics you want, so enjoy it!
Marantz has a beautiful integrated amp (PM8003) and stereo SACD player (SA8003) for $1000 each that I'm hearing a lot of positive things about. This is the stuff I would have liked to get (along with the matching tuner), but this was well over my budget for now. I was able to get the Sony ES receiver, SACD 5-disc carousel, cassette deck, and a 5 shelf Sanus Euro rack system for a little more then the price of just one of the above mentioned Marantz units alone.

As far as Sony goes, I've always loved and used their CD/DVD players, car stereos, TV's, etc., but not so much their run of the mill mass market A/V receivers, speakers, etc. However, that was years ago, and I had bigger ambitions back then as well as a bigger budget.

So this will be the first Sony ES receiver I've ever owned, and I shall see how it all plays out.
 
Last edited:
S

skers_54

Full Audioholic
I love Marantz gear. I got a really good deal on one of their receivers when HDMI was first moving out of the stratosphere. I recently had to send it in for service b/c of an HDMI issue, but its sound quality was still great.

Sounds like you got a pretty sweet system going. Let us know how the Sony turns out, since I don't think many people here have much direct experience with their better stuff.
 
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
As far as Harmon Kardon goes, it looks to be mostly a home theater company, and wouldn't interest me.
You may be right about them in modern time. Back in the old days, Harman Kardon apparently introduced the world's first stereo receiver and their citation series power amplifers were highly regarded by Audiophiles.

Given their background in high end amps I would bet from sound quality and power output stand point the HK stereo receivers are superior when compared to the Sony ES. If look is important to you and you like the look of the ES then given you specified budget, there aren't really any other choices.
 
anamorphic96

anamorphic96

Audioholic General
No offense but the Sony seems to have fewer features than many of the other receivers listed. The amp section is no better than many of the others. In fact I wonder if it even has the ability to drive 4 ohms loads as there is no mention of it at the Sony website or the Crutchfield site. The only advantage is the 5 year warranty. But with stereo receivers I doubt if its really needed.

I would have given the edge to the Onkyo, Harman, or Denon as they all have similar build qualities including aluminum face plates, subwoofer outputs, pre-out main in jacks, ability to drive 4 ohms loads.

The Onkyo and Harman are tried and true designs that have been used for many years with great reliability and performance and are typically found for less than 300 dollars from authorized dealers.

As I said before no offense but the Sony does not really offer anything that the others don't. Sony is just as much a mass market brand as the others.
 
Cristofori

Cristofori

Audioholic
No offense but the Sony seems to have fewer features than many of the other receivers listed. The amp section is no better than many of the others. In fact I wonder if it even has the ability to drive 4 ohms loads as there is no mention of it at the Sony website or the Crutchfield site. The only advantage is the 5 year warranty. But with stereo receivers I doubt if its really needed.

I would have given the edge to the Onkyo, Harman, or Denon as they all have similar build qualities including aluminum face plates, subwoofer outputs, pre-out main in jacks, ability to drive 4 ohms loads.

The Onkyo and Harman are tried and true designs that have been used for many years with great reliability and performance and are typically found for less than 300 dollars from authorized dealers.

As I said before no offense but the Sony does not really offer anything that the others don't. Sony is just as much a mass market brand as the others.
No problem, your not offending me! I don't even know if I'm going to be keeping the Sony. I've said before that I may end up exchanging it for the Marantz receiver at the same price. Either way, it may be only a temporary bridge to getting the higher end stuff I really want, even though I may still be keeping the Sony anyway.

Is Sony mass market? Yes, along with most of the stuff touted on this forum. They are all just a bunch of black boxes made in China, Malaysia, etc. (why can't we get the nice silver stuff like Europe gets?). But at least the Sony ES is a little bit above and beyond the usual stuff, at least in build quality. I can almost guarantee that you will NOT see this receiver at your local Best Buy or other comparable shops.

And the cheaper 2-channel offerings you've mentioned from the usual suspects do not have the build quality, aluminum face plates/ knobs or rigid chassis that the ES would have. The Onkyo in particular looks like the same stuff with the plastic square buttons I was looking at when I bought my first real receiver 15 years ago. Even the Marantz (which is a bit better than the usual suspects in my opinion) at the same price as the Sony ES only has a partial aluminum face plate, the rest being "resin reinforced" as they say.

As far as a subwoofer outputs goes, it looks like from the Sony's specs on Crutchfield that it's "Zone 2" output can also serve as a subwoofer output. In Sony's usually bizarre and sometimes non-user friendly way, they do things a bit differently then the others. None of this matters to me anyway, as I wouldn't need a subwoofer to possibly mess with the imaging of a good pair of full range speakers for stereo music. 4 ohms mean nothing to me either, as I just intend to use normal speakers for normal purposes, and if the Sony's amp section is no better than anyone else as you say, I don't see any reason why it couldn't drive 4 ohms anyway. Sony also doesn't give a rating for their FM sensitivity, but it obviously has one.

I also like the ability to completely shut off all the displays/lights on Sony's stuff, a feature that is very important to me, and not always available on other makes. Of course, It's always nice to be able to control everything with the same Sony remote, even the new Sony tape deck I just bought!

And the 5 year warranty is great. Even Marantz, which has a better warranty than most, is only three years. There is simply no excuse in this day and age for any decent A/V manufacturer not to offer a warranty at least as good as Marantz.

Nice talking to you,
 
Last edited:
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top